Posttraumatic stress disorder and susceptibility to misinformation for an analogue trauma event.

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Prerika R Sharma, Kimberley A Wade, Laura Jobson
{"title":"Posttraumatic stress disorder and susceptibility to misinformation for an analogue trauma event.","authors":"Prerika R Sharma, Kimberley A Wade, Laura Jobson","doi":"10.1037/tra0002063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a dearth of research on the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and memory distortions that result from external, suggestive influences. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the relationship between PTSD symptoms and susceptibility to misinformation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To address this aim, we used the trauma film paradigm and misinformation paradigm. One hundred community participants (22-65 years, 72 women, 25 men, three gender diverse) completed measures assessing PTSD symptoms and trauma exposure. Participants then viewed a film about a car accident, received verbal misinformation along with repeated and no repeated information, then completed cued recall, recognition, and source memory tests (immediate retrieval). Ninety participants completed the same memory tasks 1 week later (delayed retrieval).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, a clear misinformation effect was found. Second, PTSD symptom severity was not uniquely associated with the misinformation effect. However, for those with past exposure to a transportation accident, PTSD symptom severity was associated with a smaller misinformation effect on recognition and source memory tests. For those without past exposure, PTSD symptom severity was associated with a larger misinformation effect on the same tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationship between PTSD and the misinformation effect warrants the consideration of event relevance. If findings are replicated, legal and clinical professionals should enact extra caution in avoiding suggestive language when working with individuals with PTSD who have witnessed a novel type of stressful event. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"876-888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0002063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is a dearth of research on the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and memory distortions that result from external, suggestive influences. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the relationship between PTSD symptoms and susceptibility to misinformation.

Method: To address this aim, we used the trauma film paradigm and misinformation paradigm. One hundred community participants (22-65 years, 72 women, 25 men, three gender diverse) completed measures assessing PTSD symptoms and trauma exposure. Participants then viewed a film about a car accident, received verbal misinformation along with repeated and no repeated information, then completed cued recall, recognition, and source memory tests (immediate retrieval). Ninety participants completed the same memory tasks 1 week later (delayed retrieval).

Results: First, a clear misinformation effect was found. Second, PTSD symptom severity was not uniquely associated with the misinformation effect. However, for those with past exposure to a transportation accident, PTSD symptom severity was associated with a smaller misinformation effect on recognition and source memory tests. For those without past exposure, PTSD symptom severity was associated with a larger misinformation effect on the same tests.

Conclusions: The relationship between PTSD and the misinformation effect warrants the consideration of event relevance. If findings are replicated, legal and clinical professionals should enact extra caution in avoiding suggestive language when working with individuals with PTSD who have witnessed a novel type of stressful event. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

创伤后应激障碍和对类似创伤事件错误信息的易感性。
目的:目前缺乏关于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与外部暗示影响导致的记忆扭曲之间关系的研究。因此,本研究旨在探讨PTSD症状与对错误信息的易感性之间的关系。方法:为了解决这一问题,我们采用了创伤片范式和错误信息范式。100名社区参与者(22-65岁,72名女性,25名男性,3名性别不同)完成了评估PTSD症状和创伤暴露的措施。然后,参与者观看了一部关于车祸的电影,接受了口头错误信息以及重复和不重复的信息,然后完成了线索回忆、识别和源记忆测试(即时检索)。90名参与者在一周后完成了相同的记忆任务(延迟检索)。结果:第一,发现了明显的误报效应。第二,创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度并不是唯一与错误信息效应相关的。然而,对于那些过去经历过交通事故的人来说,在识别和源记忆测试中,PTSD症状的严重程度与较小的错误信息效应有关。对于那些过去没有接触过的人,在相同的测试中,PTSD症状的严重程度与更大的错误信息效应有关。结论:创伤后应激障碍与错误信息效应的关系值得考虑事件相关性。如果研究结果被重复,法律和临床专业人员在与目睹了一种新型压力事件的PTSD患者打交道时,应该格外小心,避免使用暗示性语言。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书