Effect of Bundled Care on External Ventricular Drain Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Samuel Neal Blacker, Hemanshu Prabhakar, Elizabeth Olive Moreton, Mark Burbridge, Lauren Dunn, Lindsey N Gouker, Benjamin J Heller, Kiran Jangra, Mia Kang, Jacob W Nadler, Veerle De Sloovere, Alex Raquer, Gentle S Shrestha, Brian Sindelar, James Williams, Daniel Winecoff, Vishal Yajnik, Abhijit V Lele
{"title":"Effect of Bundled Care on External Ventricular Drain Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Samuel Neal Blacker, Hemanshu Prabhakar, Elizabeth Olive Moreton, Mark Burbridge, Lauren Dunn, Lindsey N Gouker, Benjamin J Heller, Kiran Jangra, Mia Kang, Jacob W Nadler, Veerle De Sloovere, Alex Raquer, Gentle S Shrestha, Brian Sindelar, James Williams, Daniel Winecoff, Vishal Yajnik, Abhijit V Lele","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>External ventricular drains (EVDs) are critical for managing acute intracranial conditions but are associated with infections. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether the implementation of infection prevention bundles reduces the risk of EVD-associated infections, which was registered with PROSPERO on July 25, 2024 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ): CRD42024573168. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies reporting EVD infection rates with and without bundle implementation. Two reviewers independently assessed bundle element presence and extracted infection outcomes. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp adjustment, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. An exploratory subgroup analysis compared bundle element implementation between studies achieving <5% infection rates and those with ≥5%. Twenty-two studies were analyzed, including 6330 patients (3895 in the bundle group and 2435 in the nonbundle group). Hand hygiene (100%) and administration of preinsertion antibiotics (91%) were the most frequently implemented bundle elements, whereas structured weaning protocols were infrequently reported (9%). Bundle implementation was associated with a significant reduction in EVD infection risk (pooled Risk Ratio [RR]: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.65, P <0.001). Moderate heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=50.9%). The use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters, tunneled catheter placement, and structured education programs were more frequently present among studies achieving infection rates <5%. Implementing an infection prevention bundle is associated with a significant reduction in EVD infections. Adoption of core practices, supplemented by technology enhancements and education programs, may further optimize infection prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"287-296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are critical for managing acute intracranial conditions but are associated with infections. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether the implementation of infection prevention bundles reduces the risk of EVD-associated infections, which was registered with PROSPERO on July 25, 2024 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ): CRD42024573168. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies reporting EVD infection rates with and without bundle implementation. Two reviewers independently assessed bundle element presence and extracted infection outcomes. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp adjustment, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. An exploratory subgroup analysis compared bundle element implementation between studies achieving <5% infection rates and those with ≥5%. Twenty-two studies were analyzed, including 6330 patients (3895 in the bundle group and 2435 in the nonbundle group). Hand hygiene (100%) and administration of preinsertion antibiotics (91%) were the most frequently implemented bundle elements, whereas structured weaning protocols were infrequently reported (9%). Bundle implementation was associated with a significant reduction in EVD infection risk (pooled Risk Ratio [RR]: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.65, P <0.001). Moderate heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=50.9%). The use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters, tunneled catheter placement, and structured education programs were more frequently present among studies achieving infection rates <5%. Implementing an infection prevention bundle is associated with a significant reduction in EVD infections. Adoption of core practices, supplemented by technology enhancements and education programs, may further optimize infection prevention strategies.

捆绑护理对脑室外引流感染的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
室外引流(EVDs)是治疗急性颅内疾病的关键,但与感染有关。我们进行了系统回顾和meta分析,以评估感染预防捆绑包的实施是否降低了evd相关感染的风险,该捆绑包于2024年7月25日在PROSPERO登记(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/): CRD42024573168。系统地检索PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus数据库,以报告有无捆绑实施的EVD感染率。两名评论者独立评估了束素的存在并提取了感染结果。meta分析采用Hartung-Knapp调整的随机效应模型,采用I²统计量评估异质性。一项探索性的亚组分析比较了不同研究之间bundle element的实施情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书