Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Sprint-Specific Exercises: Impact on Maximal Sprint Acceleration Training.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2025-10-24 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.5114/jhk/211899
Jérémy Jusseaume, Charly Fornasier-Santos, Jean-Benoit Morin, Benjamin Millot, Gaël Guilhem, Jean Slawinski
{"title":"Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Sprint-Specific Exercises: Impact on Maximal Sprint Acceleration Training.","authors":"Jérémy Jusseaume, Charly Fornasier-Santos, Jean-Benoit Morin, Benjamin Millot, Gaël Guilhem, Jean Slawinski","doi":"10.5114/jhk/211899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sprint-specific exercises (SSEs) are believed to train force, power and/or velocity qualities involved in the acceleration phase of sprinting. However, the kinetics and the kinematics of such exercises have never been explored. The aim of this study was to compare mechanical variables (horizontal and vertical forces, horizontal velocity of the centre of mass and the ratio of force) between SSEs and an all-out 40-m sprint acceleration (Sref). These variables were measured over each situation (Sref and 14 SSE) using six track-embedded force plates. The horizontal forces and velocities were either lower or equal to those of the Sref (SSE grand average deviation from FVP ~ -0.29 N∙kg<sup>-1</sup> for force; SSE grand average from Sref ~ -0.14 m∙s<sup>-1</sup> for velocity), while vertical force output was mostly greater in the SSE than the Sref (SSE mean deviation from Sref ~0.49 N∙kg<sup>-1</sup>). The ratio of force was lower or equal for the SSE compared to Sref. Despite large inter-individual variability, these SSEs seem useful to stimulate vertical force production, and not horizontal as hypothesised by coaches. These results suggest the importance of analysing the SSE used during training, from a force-velocity point of view, to better characterize their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Kinetics","volume":"99 ","pages":"191-205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12612812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/211899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sprint-specific exercises (SSEs) are believed to train force, power and/or velocity qualities involved in the acceleration phase of sprinting. However, the kinetics and the kinematics of such exercises have never been explored. The aim of this study was to compare mechanical variables (horizontal and vertical forces, horizontal velocity of the centre of mass and the ratio of force) between SSEs and an all-out 40-m sprint acceleration (Sref). These variables were measured over each situation (Sref and 14 SSE) using six track-embedded force plates. The horizontal forces and velocities were either lower or equal to those of the Sref (SSE grand average deviation from FVP ~ -0.29 N∙kg-1 for force; SSE grand average from Sref ~ -0.14 m∙s-1 for velocity), while vertical force output was mostly greater in the SSE than the Sref (SSE mean deviation from Sref ~0.49 N∙kg-1). The ratio of force was lower or equal for the SSE compared to Sref. Despite large inter-individual variability, these SSEs seem useful to stimulate vertical force production, and not horizontal as hypothesised by coaches. These results suggest the importance of analysing the SSE used during training, from a force-velocity point of view, to better characterize their effectiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

短跑专项训练的运动学和动力学比较:对最大短跑加速训练的影响。
短跑专项训练(ses)被认为是训练力量,力量和/或速度素质,涉及冲刺的加速阶段。然而,这些运动的动力学和运动学从未被探索过。本研究的目的是比较ssi和全速冲刺40米加速度(Sref)之间的力学变量(水平和垂直力,质量中心的水平速度和力的比率)。这些变量在每种情况下(Sref和14sse)使用六个轨道嵌入力板测量。水平方向的力和速度或小于或等于Sref(力的SSE大平均值偏离FVP ~ -0.29 N∙kg-1;速度的SSE大平均值偏离Sref ~ -0.14 m∙s-1),而垂直方向的力输出大多大于Sref (SSE平均偏离Sref ~0.49 N∙kg-1)。与Sref相比,SSE的力比更低或相等。尽管个体之间存在很大的差异,但这些ssi似乎有助于刺激垂直方向的力量产生,而不是教练假设的水平方向。这些结果表明,从力-速度的角度分析训练过程中使用的SSE的重要性,以更好地表征其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Human Kinetics
Journal of Human Kinetics 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Kinetics is an open access interdisciplinary periodical offering the latest research in the science of human movement studies. This comprehensive professional journal features articles and research notes encompassing such topic areas as: Kinesiology, Exercise Physiology and Nutrition, Sports Training and Behavioural Sciences in Sport, but especially considering elite and competitive aspects of sport. The journal publishes original papers, invited reviews, short communications and letters to the Editors. Manuscripts submitted to the journal must contain novel data on theoretical or experimental research or on practical applications in the field of sport sciences. The Journal of Human Kinetics is published in March, June, September and December. We encourage scientists from around the world to submit their papers to our periodical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书