Heterogeneity in high hypnotic suggestibility: Models, evidence, and synthesis.

International review of neurobiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-26 DOI:10.1016/bs.irn.2025.09.004
Devin B Terhune
{"title":"Heterogeneity in high hypnotic suggestibility: Models, evidence, and synthesis.","authors":"Devin B Terhune","doi":"10.1016/bs.irn.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most empirical studies and theoretical models in research on suggestion and hypnosis presuppose that highly suggestible individuals comprise a uniform population. This assumption contrasts with consistent evidence for heterogeneity in this group, yet these findings have not been systematically integrated or evaluated against competing models of heterogeneity. In this article, I first outline the characteristics of heterogeneity among highly suggestible individuals, highlight methodological considerations, and review the assumptions of different models of heterogeneity. Next, I consider evidence for heterogeneity spanning responsiveness to hypnotic inductions and suggestions, strategy use during response to suggestion, developmental trajectories, cognitive-perceptual profiles, and symptomatology. I identify key limitations in this research area, highlight convergent findings within and across these domains, assess the explanatory scope of different models, and propose priorities for future research on heterogeneity. Elucidating the characteristics and latent structure of heterogeneity among highly suggestible individuals is essential for advancing our understanding of the neurocognitive substrates of suggestion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94058,"journal":{"name":"International review of neurobiology","volume":"185 ","pages":"59-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International review of neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2025.09.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most empirical studies and theoretical models in research on suggestion and hypnosis presuppose that highly suggestible individuals comprise a uniform population. This assumption contrasts with consistent evidence for heterogeneity in this group, yet these findings have not been systematically integrated or evaluated against competing models of heterogeneity. In this article, I first outline the characteristics of heterogeneity among highly suggestible individuals, highlight methodological considerations, and review the assumptions of different models of heterogeneity. Next, I consider evidence for heterogeneity spanning responsiveness to hypnotic inductions and suggestions, strategy use during response to suggestion, developmental trajectories, cognitive-perceptual profiles, and symptomatology. I identify key limitations in this research area, highlight convergent findings within and across these domains, assess the explanatory scope of different models, and propose priorities for future research on heterogeneity. Elucidating the characteristics and latent structure of heterogeneity among highly suggestible individuals is essential for advancing our understanding of the neurocognitive substrates of suggestion.

高催眠暗示的异质性:模型、证据和综合。
大多数关于暗示和催眠的实证研究和理论模型都假设高度易受暗示的个体是一个统一的群体。这一假设与该组异质性的一致证据形成对比,然而这些发现尚未被系统地整合或与竞争性异质性模型进行评估。在本文中,我首先概述了高度易受暗示个体的异质性特征,强调了方法上的考虑,并回顾了不同异质性模型的假设。接下来,我考虑异质性的证据,包括对催眠诱导和暗示的反应,对暗示的反应过程中的策略使用,发展轨迹,认知-知觉概况和症状学。我确定了这一研究领域的关键局限性,强调了这些领域内和跨领域的收敛性发现,评估了不同模型的解释范围,并提出了未来异质性研究的优先事项。阐明高易受暗示个体的特征和潜在的异质性结构,对于促进我们对暗示的神经认知基础的理解至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书