Trust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and gender.

IF 3.3 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Public Understanding of Science Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-16 DOI:10.1177/09636625251386562
Steven David Pickering, Martin Ejnar Hansen, Han Dorussen, Jason Reifler, Thomas J Scotto, Yosuke Sunahara, Dorothy Yen
{"title":"Trust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and gender.","authors":"Steven David Pickering, Martin Ejnar Hansen, Han Dorussen, Jason Reifler, Thomas J Scotto, Yosuke Sunahara, Dorothy Yen","doi":"10.1177/09636625251386562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines trust in science in England, focusing on variation across demographic and ideological groups. Using survey data from 11,173 respondents, we compare trust in two domains, medical doctors and scientists, to explore whether predictors operate similarly across these professional groups. We find higher education is associated with greater trust, while right-wing political orientation predicts lower trust. Religious affiliation also matters, with some faith groups reporting lower trust relative to the non-religious baseline. Gender differences emerge as well, particularly in trust in medical doctors. Respondents selecting 'Prefer not to say' on the religion item report significantly lower trust in both doctors and scientists, consistent with a broader privacy-motivated disclosure style. Our results highlight the importance of considering not just overall levels of trust in science, but variation across education, ideology, religion and gender, and they suggest that trust in doctors and trust in scientists, while related, are not interchangeable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":" ","pages":"352-366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12999988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Understanding of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251386562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines trust in science in England, focusing on variation across demographic and ideological groups. Using survey data from 11,173 respondents, we compare trust in two domains, medical doctors and scientists, to explore whether predictors operate similarly across these professional groups. We find higher education is associated with greater trust, while right-wing political orientation predicts lower trust. Religious affiliation also matters, with some faith groups reporting lower trust relative to the non-religious baseline. Gender differences emerge as well, particularly in trust in medical doctors. Respondents selecting 'Prefer not to say' on the religion item report significantly lower trust in both doctors and scientists, consistent with a broader privacy-motivated disclosure style. Our results highlight the importance of considering not just overall levels of trust in science, but variation across education, ideology, religion and gender, and they suggest that trust in doctors and trust in scientists, while related, are not interchangeable.

对科学家和医生的信任:信仰、政治、教育和性别的作用。
本文考察了英国对科学的信任,重点关注了人口和意识形态群体之间的差异。使用来自11,173名受访者的调查数据,我们比较了医生和科学家这两个领域的信任,以探索预测因素在这些专业群体中的作用是否相似。我们发现,高等教育与更高的信任有关,而右翼政治倾向则预示着更低的信任。宗教信仰也很重要,一些信仰团体的信任度低于非宗教团体。性别差异也出现了,特别是在对医生的信任方面。在宗教问题上选择“宁愿不说”的受访者对医生和科学家的信任度都明显较低,这与更广泛的隐私披露风格相一致。我们的研究结果强调了不仅要考虑对科学的总体信任水平,还要考虑教育、意识形态、宗教和性别之间的差异的重要性,他们表明,对医生的信任和对科学家的信任虽然相关,但不能互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Public Understanding of Science is a fully peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Public Understanding of Science is the only journal to cover all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Topics Covered Include... ·surveys of public understanding and attitudes towards science and technology ·perceptions of science ·popular representations of science ·scientific and para-scientific belief systems ·science in schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书