The emergence of object play in young children at elevated likelihood for autism.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
British Journal of Developmental Psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-17 DOI:10.1111/bjdp.70026
Floor Moerman, Petra Warreyn, Sofie Boterberg, Lyssa de Vries, Maide Erdogan, Melinda Madarevic, Ilse Noens, Sarah Schaubroeck, Jean Steyaert, Lotte van Esch, Herbert Roeyers
{"title":"The emergence of object play in young children at elevated likelihood for autism.","authors":"Floor Moerman, Petra Warreyn, Sofie Boterberg, Lyssa de Vries, Maide Erdogan, Melinda Madarevic, Ilse Noens, Sarah Schaubroeck, Jean Steyaert, Lotte van Esch, Herbert Roeyers","doi":"10.1111/bjdp.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective study investigated object exploration and combination play, in addition to (pre-)symbolic play in children at elevated likelihood for autism (EL; younger siblings of autistic children and very preterm children). Play of EL-children with (n = 22) and without (n = 61) a best-estimate research diagnosis of autism at 36 months was measured using detailed coding of direct observations at the (corrected) age of 10 and 14 months. As expected, autistic and non-autistic EL-children progressed to (pre-)symbolic play following the onset of combination play. There were no significant differences between both groups for most play behaviours at 10 and 14 months. Non-autistic EL-children did engage in more general combination play acts than autistic EL-children at 10 months. Moreover, 25% of the non-autistic EL-children showed general combination play, versus none of the autistic EL-children at 10 months. At 14 months, non-autistic EL-children spent slightly more of their playtime in spontaneous (pre-)symbolic play than autistic EL-children at 14 months. Object play behaviours were more similar than different between autistic and non-autistic EL-children at 10 and 14 months when playing alone. Our findings do not offer strong support for using solitary object play assessment as a method to identify autism in these very young EL-children.</p>","PeriodicalId":51418,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"397-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This prospective study investigated object exploration and combination play, in addition to (pre-)symbolic play in children at elevated likelihood for autism (EL; younger siblings of autistic children and very preterm children). Play of EL-children with (n = 22) and without (n = 61) a best-estimate research diagnosis of autism at 36 months was measured using detailed coding of direct observations at the (corrected) age of 10 and 14 months. As expected, autistic and non-autistic EL-children progressed to (pre-)symbolic play following the onset of combination play. There were no significant differences between both groups for most play behaviours at 10 and 14 months. Non-autistic EL-children did engage in more general combination play acts than autistic EL-children at 10 months. Moreover, 25% of the non-autistic EL-children showed general combination play, versus none of the autistic EL-children at 10 months. At 14 months, non-autistic EL-children spent slightly more of their playtime in spontaneous (pre-)symbolic play than autistic EL-children at 14 months. Object play behaviours were more similar than different between autistic and non-autistic EL-children at 10 and 14 months when playing alone. Our findings do not offer strong support for using solitary object play assessment as a method to identify autism in these very young EL-children.

客体游戏的出现在自闭症可能性增加的幼儿中。
本前瞻性研究调查了自闭症高可能性儿童(EL;自闭症儿童的弟弟妹妹和非常早产的儿童)在(前)象征性游戏之外的客体探索和组合游戏。在36个月大的时候,有(n = 22)和没有(n = 61)孤独症最佳估计研究诊断的el -儿童的玩耍使用10个月和14个月大(修正)时直接观察的详细编码进行测量。正如预期的那样,自闭和非自闭el儿童在组合游戏开始后发展到(前)象征性游戏。在10个月和14个月时,两组婴儿的大多数游戏行为没有显著差异。在10个月时,非自闭症的el儿童确实比自闭症的el儿童参与了更多的综合游戏行为。此外,25%的非自闭症el儿童在10个月时表现出一般的组合游戏,而自闭症el儿童则没有。在14个月时,非自闭症的el儿童在自发(前)象征性游戏中花费的游戏时间略多于14个月时自闭症的el儿童。在10个月和14个月时,自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童在单独玩耍时,物体游戏行为的相似性大于差异。我们的研究结果并没有提供强有力的支持,将单独物体游戏评估作为识别这些非常年幼的el儿童自闭症的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
British Journal of Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Developmental Psychology publishes full-length, empirical, conceptual, review and discussion papers, as well as brief reports, in all of the following areas: - motor, perceptual, cognitive, social and emotional development in infancy; - social, emotional and personality development in childhood, adolescence and adulthood; - cognitive and socio-cognitive development in childhood, adolescence and adulthood, including the development of language, mathematics, theory of mind, drawings, spatial cognition, biological and societal understanding; - atypical development, including developmental disorders, learning difficulties/disabilities and sensory impairments;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书