Protocol: The Effects of Communication Strategies on Upcycled Food Acceptance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.8 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Shuai Ma, Zhihong Xu, Peng Lu, Jean Parrella, Ashlynn Kogut
{"title":"Protocol: The Effects of Communication Strategies on Upcycled Food Acceptance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Shuai Ma,&nbsp;Zhihong Xu,&nbsp;Peng Lu,&nbsp;Jean Parrella,&nbsp;Ashlynn Kogut","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. Our review will exclusively emphasize quantitative evidence from experimental studies, identifying the important factors and providing comprehensive and in-depth recommendations, with a primary focus on identifying the effective communication and marketing strategies that have been evaluated. The findings of the study focusing on consumers' acceptance will provide valuable insight for policymakers to combat the food waste issue. The research questions are as follows: RQ1: What are the key factors influencing consumer acceptance in experimental studies on upcycled foods? RQ2: What communication and marketing strategies have been used to increase consumer acceptance in experimental studies on upcycled foods?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.70075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. Our review will exclusively emphasize quantitative evidence from experimental studies, identifying the important factors and providing comprehensive and in-depth recommendations, with a primary focus on identifying the effective communication and marketing strategies that have been evaluated. The findings of the study focusing on consumers' acceptance will provide valuable insight for policymakers to combat the food waste issue. The research questions are as follows: RQ1: What are the key factors influencing consumer acceptance in experimental studies on upcycled foods? RQ2: What communication and marketing strategies have been used to increase consumer acceptance in experimental studies on upcycled foods?

Abstract Image

协议:沟通策略对升级食品接受度的影响:系统回顾和元分析
这是坎贝尔系统评价的方案。目标如下。我们的审查将专门强调来自实验研究的定量证据,确定重要因素并提供全面和深入的建议,主要侧重于确定已评估的有效沟通和营销策略。关注消费者接受度的研究结果将为政策制定者应对食物浪费问题提供有价值的见解。研究问题如下:RQ1:在升级食品的实验研究中,影响消费者接受度的关键因素是什么?RQ2:为了提高消费者对再生食品实验研究的接受度,采用了哪些沟通和营销策略?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书