Loiy Al-Ghussain , Bilal Rinchi , Mohammad Alrbai , Sameer Al-Dahidi , Zifeng Lu
{"title":"Enabling e-fuels in Middle East and North Africa: Life cycle and techno-economic insights into CO2 capture and utilization","authors":"Loiy Al-Ghussain , Bilal Rinchi , Mohammad Alrbai , Sameer Al-Dahidi , Zifeng Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the levelized cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity of CO<sub>2</sub> capture and e-fuel production pathways across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Industrial point-source CO₂ capture shows favorable techno-economic performance, particularly from natural gas and oil processing facilities, with a regional weighted average cost of approximately 51 USD/tCO<sub>2cap</sub>, making it a viable source of low-cost CO₂ for e-fuel production. Among MENA countries, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates exhibit the lowest capture costs (38–44 USD/tCO<sub>2cap</sub>), attributable to high emission volumes and low energy prices. The corresponding GHG emission intensity (EI) of point-source capture averages around 180 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub>/tCO<sub>2cap</sub>. Regarding e-fuel production, Fischer–Tropsch (FT) fuels are identified as the most expensive and carbon-intensive option, with average production costs exceeding 0.07 USD/MJ and EIs surpassing 30 gCO<sub>2eq</sub>/MJ in most MENA countries. In contrast, ammonia synthesis offers the lowest emission intensity, ranging from 7.1 to 21.8 gCO<sub>2eq</sub>/MJ depending on the energy source. Although none of the e-fuel pathways are currently cost-competitive with fossil fuels, industrial point-source CO<sub>2</sub> capture in the MENA region presents a promising near-term opportunity. Realizing this potential will require targeted policy measures, including the implementation of carbon pricing, the expansion of renewable energy capacity, and strategic infrastructure investments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9387,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100538"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656825001757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the levelized cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity of CO2 capture and e-fuel production pathways across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Industrial point-source CO₂ capture shows favorable techno-economic performance, particularly from natural gas and oil processing facilities, with a regional weighted average cost of approximately 51 USD/tCO2cap, making it a viable source of low-cost CO₂ for e-fuel production. Among MENA countries, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates exhibit the lowest capture costs (38–44 USD/tCO2cap), attributable to high emission volumes and low energy prices. The corresponding GHG emission intensity (EI) of point-source capture averages around 180 kgCO2eq/tCO2cap. Regarding e-fuel production, Fischer–Tropsch (FT) fuels are identified as the most expensive and carbon-intensive option, with average production costs exceeding 0.07 USD/MJ and EIs surpassing 30 gCO2eq/MJ in most MENA countries. In contrast, ammonia synthesis offers the lowest emission intensity, ranging from 7.1 to 21.8 gCO2eq/MJ depending on the energy source. Although none of the e-fuel pathways are currently cost-competitive with fossil fuels, industrial point-source CO2 capture in the MENA region presents a promising near-term opportunity. Realizing this potential will require targeted policy measures, including the implementation of carbon pricing, the expansion of renewable energy capacity, and strategic infrastructure investments.