Emanuele Käser , Estelle Reymond , Daniela S. Nosch
{"title":"Corneal sensitivity in dry eye disease: A systematic review","authors":"Emanuele Käser , Estelle Reymond , Daniela S. Nosch","doi":"10.1016/j.jtos.2025.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dry eye disease (DED) is a worldwide prevalent condition; however, its pathophysiology is not well understood. Corneal nerves play a primary role in DED, and a better understanding of the changes to their morphology and function is required. This systematic review investigated changes to the function of corneal nerves.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Relevant literature from inception to September 10, 2025 was searched for in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, following the PRISMA statement. Studies measuring corneal sensitivity in patients with DED and in healthy controls were included. Publication selection and analysis were conducted independently by two authors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five studies involving 1580 participants (1001 with DED and 579 healthy controls) were included. Nineteen studies used the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer and found a consistently reduced corneal sensitivity in patients with DED. No consistent correlation was found between corneal sensitivity and DED severity, possibly due to heterogeneity of study design and methodology. Six studies used a variant of the Belmonte air jet aesthesiometer, reporting inconsistent results for mechanical corneal sensitivity. Increased sensitivity in DED patients was reported, using a stimulus at ambient temperature. One study used the Brill aesthesiometer and found reduced corneal sensitivity in DED patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cochet-Bonnet measurements suggest a decreased mechanical corneal sensitivity in DED patients. Air jet aesthesiometry results were inconsistent, indicating variable responses from functionally different corneal nerve endings. Future research should employ reliable corneal sensitivity measurement methods with a wide stimulus range and standardised study designs to improve understanding of changes in corneal sensitivity in dry eye disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54691,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Surface","volume":"39 ","pages":"Pages 1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Surface","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542012425001302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Dry eye disease (DED) is a worldwide prevalent condition; however, its pathophysiology is not well understood. Corneal nerves play a primary role in DED, and a better understanding of the changes to their morphology and function is required. This systematic review investigated changes to the function of corneal nerves.
Methods
Relevant literature from inception to September 10, 2025 was searched for in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, following the PRISMA statement. Studies measuring corneal sensitivity in patients with DED and in healthy controls were included. Publication selection and analysis were conducted independently by two authors.
Results
Twenty-five studies involving 1580 participants (1001 with DED and 579 healthy controls) were included. Nineteen studies used the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer and found a consistently reduced corneal sensitivity in patients with DED. No consistent correlation was found between corneal sensitivity and DED severity, possibly due to heterogeneity of study design and methodology. Six studies used a variant of the Belmonte air jet aesthesiometer, reporting inconsistent results for mechanical corneal sensitivity. Increased sensitivity in DED patients was reported, using a stimulus at ambient temperature. One study used the Brill aesthesiometer and found reduced corneal sensitivity in DED patients.
Conclusion
Cochet-Bonnet measurements suggest a decreased mechanical corneal sensitivity in DED patients. Air jet aesthesiometry results were inconsistent, indicating variable responses from functionally different corneal nerve endings. Future research should employ reliable corneal sensitivity measurement methods with a wide stimulus range and standardised study designs to improve understanding of changes in corneal sensitivity in dry eye disease.
干眼病(DED)是一种世界性的常见病;然而,其病理生理机制尚不清楚。角膜神经在DED中起主要作用,需要更好地了解其形态和功能的变化。本系统综述研究了角膜神经功能的变化。方法按照PRISMA的声明,在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus中检索成立至2025年9月10日的相关文献。研究测量了DED患者和健康对照的角膜敏感性。出版物选择和分析由两位作者独立进行。结果共纳入25项研究,共1580名受试者(1001名DED患者和579名健康对照)。19项研究使用Cochet-Bonnet美感计,发现DED患者的角膜敏感性持续降低。角膜敏感性和DED严重程度之间没有一致的相关性,可能是由于研究设计和方法的异质性。六项研究使用了贝尔蒙特喷气美感计的一种变体,报告了机械角膜敏感度不一致的结果。据报道,在环境温度下使用刺激会增加DED患者的敏感性。一项使用Brill美感计的研究发现,DED患者的角膜敏感度降低。结论cochet - bonnet测量提示DED患者角膜机械敏感性降低。喷气美感测量结果不一致,表明不同功能的角膜神经末梢的不同反应。未来的研究应采用可靠的角膜敏感性测量方法、广泛的刺激范围和标准化的研究设计,以提高对干眼病角膜敏感性变化的认识。
期刊介绍:
The Ocular Surface, a quarterly, a peer-reviewed journal, is an authoritative resource that integrates and interprets major findings in diverse fields related to the ocular surface, including ophthalmology, optometry, genetics, molecular biology, pharmacology, immunology, infectious disease, and epidemiology. Its critical review articles cover the most current knowledge on medical and surgical management of ocular surface pathology, new understandings of ocular surface physiology, the meaning of recent discoveries on how the ocular surface responds to injury and disease, and updates on drug and device development. The journal also publishes select original research reports and articles describing cutting-edge techniques and technology in the field.
Benefits to authors
We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center