{"title":"Unveiling the effects of GenAI on motivation of learning English as a second/foreign language: Evidence from meta-analysis","authors":"Meng Xiong , Timothy Teo","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing interest in the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in second language education, its impact on learners' motivation in English as a second or foreign language (ESL/EFL) contexts remains unclear due to inconsistent findings and limited theory-based synthesis. This meta-analysis synthesized 47 effect sizes from 24 empirical studies (N = 7075) to examine the effects of GenAI-supported interventions on ESL/EFL learner motivation. A three-level model revealed a moderate and statistically significant overall effect (g = 0.611, p < .001). Stronger effects were observed for motivation types such as the Ideal L2 Self, L2 Learning Experience, and self-efficacy, while intrinsic, extrinsic, and Ought-to L2 Self motivation showed non-significant effects. Moderator analyses based on the usefulness framework identified three significant contextual factors: communication format , use context, and ESL/EFL learning setting. Specifically, multimodal formats combining text and voice yielded stronger effects than single-mode formats, in-class applications were more effective than after-class use, and GenAI produced larger motivational gains in EFL settings than in ESL ones. These findings offer theory-informed insights and practical guidance for developing GenAI-supported language learning interventions that align with learners’ motivational profiles and instructional contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100744"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite growing interest in the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in second language education, its impact on learners' motivation in English as a second or foreign language (ESL/EFL) contexts remains unclear due to inconsistent findings and limited theory-based synthesis. This meta-analysis synthesized 47 effect sizes from 24 empirical studies (N = 7075) to examine the effects of GenAI-supported interventions on ESL/EFL learner motivation. A three-level model revealed a moderate and statistically significant overall effect (g = 0.611, p < .001). Stronger effects were observed for motivation types such as the Ideal L2 Self, L2 Learning Experience, and self-efficacy, while intrinsic, extrinsic, and Ought-to L2 Self motivation showed non-significant effects. Moderator analyses based on the usefulness framework identified three significant contextual factors: communication format , use context, and ESL/EFL learning setting. Specifically, multimodal formats combining text and voice yielded stronger effects than single-mode formats, in-class applications were more effective than after-class use, and GenAI produced larger motivational gains in EFL settings than in ESL ones. These findings offer theory-informed insights and practical guidance for developing GenAI-supported language learning interventions that align with learners’ motivational profiles and instructional contexts.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.