Farm Policies and Their Impact on Sector Composition and Risk Aversion

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Theodoros Skevas, Wyatt Thompson
{"title":"Farm Policies and Their Impact on Sector Composition and Risk Aversion","authors":"Theodoros Skevas,&nbsp;Wyatt Thompson","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines how farm policies influence the composition and risk aversion of the farm sector using an agent-based model based on Missouri crop farms. The analysis considers varying farmer risk aversion, payoffs from farming and other activities, and land competition. Policy scenarios include no policy, land subsidies and revenue floors. Findings indicate policies significantly affect who farms and sector-wide risk aversion. Without policies, risk-averse farmers exit, reducing sector-wide risk aversion. Conversely, risk-mitigating policies retain risk-averse farmers, increasing sectoral risk aversion. The study further finds that altering the composition of individuals in the farm sector through risk-reduction policies increases the demand for such policies. These results trace the risk-reducing effects of policies from individual decisions about farm entry, expansion and exit to broader impacts on sector structure. For scientists, this highlights the need to consider sector-level risk aversion as part of the research problem, not merely an exogenous aspect of a fixed population. For policymakers, results indicate that farm program design may affect who farms and lead to lower average risk tolerance, potentially increasing the demand for further publicly supported risk management tools.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 1","pages":"171-182"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.70014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how farm policies influence the composition and risk aversion of the farm sector using an agent-based model based on Missouri crop farms. The analysis considers varying farmer risk aversion, payoffs from farming and other activities, and land competition. Policy scenarios include no policy, land subsidies and revenue floors. Findings indicate policies significantly affect who farms and sector-wide risk aversion. Without policies, risk-averse farmers exit, reducing sector-wide risk aversion. Conversely, risk-mitigating policies retain risk-averse farmers, increasing sectoral risk aversion. The study further finds that altering the composition of individuals in the farm sector through risk-reduction policies increases the demand for such policies. These results trace the risk-reducing effects of policies from individual decisions about farm entry, expansion and exit to broader impacts on sector structure. For scientists, this highlights the need to consider sector-level risk aversion as part of the research problem, not merely an exogenous aspect of a fixed population. For policymakers, results indicate that farm program design may affect who farms and lead to lower average risk tolerance, potentially increasing the demand for further publicly supported risk management tools.

农业政策及其对行业构成和风险规避的影响
本研究考察了农业政策如何影响农业部门的构成和风险规避,使用基于代理的模型,以密苏里州的农作物农场为基础。该分析考虑了不同农民的风险厌恶程度、农业和其他活动的收益以及土地竞争。政策情景包括没有政策、土地补贴和最低收入。研究结果表明,政策显著影响了谁在农场和整个行业的风险厌恶。如果没有政策,风险厌恶的农民就会退出,从而降低整个行业的风险厌恶程度。相反,风险缓解政策留住了风险厌恶的农民,增加了行业风险厌恶。研究进一步发现,通过降低风险政策改变农业部门的个人构成会增加对此类政策的需求。这些结果追溯了政策对降低风险的影响,从关于农场进入、扩张和退出的个人决策到对部门结构的更广泛影响。对于科学家来说,这突出了将行业层面的风险厌恶作为研究问题的一部分来考虑的必要性,而不仅仅是固定人群的外生方面。对于政策制定者来说,研究结果表明,农场规划设计可能会影响到谁去耕种,并导致平均风险承受能力降低,从而可能增加对进一步公共支持的风险管理工具的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书