Unsupervised machine learning models reveal two distinct post-operative physical activity profiles among joint arthroplasty patients: a United Kingdom biobank cohort study.

IF 4.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Omar Musbahi, Sara Sousi, Ahmed Al-Saadawi, Sevasti Panagiota Glynou, Alex Bottle, Justin P Cobb, Gareth G Jones
{"title":"Unsupervised machine learning models reveal two distinct post-operative physical activity profiles among joint arthroplasty patients: a United Kingdom biobank cohort study.","authors":"Omar Musbahi, Sara Sousi, Ahmed Al-Saadawi, Sevasti Panagiota Glynou, Alex Bottle, Justin P Cobb, Gareth G Jones","doi":"10.1186/s42836-025-00339-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and characterise distinct post-operative physical activity profiles in joint arthroplasty patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study utilised wrist-worn accelerometer data from the UK Biobank, linked to hospital records, to identify patients who underwent primary unilateral hip or knee arthroplasty. Daily step counts from 4 to 12 months post-operatively were extracted using validated algorithms. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to demographic and clinical variables to reduce dimensionality, followed by clustering using k-means and Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM). The optimal number of clusters was determined using the elbow method and silhouette score. Clustering validity was assessed using the Rand Index and Adjusted Rand Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>237 patients were included, the majority of whom were female, with a mean age of 66 years. Based on the elbow plot and the highest average silhouette width, a two-cluster solution was deemed optimal, consistently emerging across both clustering methods as distinct high-and low-performing physical activity profiles. High performers had significantly higher daily step counts (mean > 10,000 vs. < 6,000, P < 0.001), were younger, had a lower body mass index, fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to have undergone total hip replacement. Sociodemographic factors such as higher educational attainment and lower deprivation index were also associated with the high-performing group. The clustering methods demonstrated a weak-but-positive agreement (ARI = 0.224).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unsupervised learning of accelerometer-derived physical activity data revealed two clinically meaningful recovery profiles following joint arthroplasty. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of post-operative recovery and support the development of personalised rehabilitation strategies to improve outcomes in lower limb arthroplasty patients. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"7 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-025-00339-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify and characterise distinct post-operative physical activity profiles in joint arthroplasty patients.

Methods: This cohort study utilised wrist-worn accelerometer data from the UK Biobank, linked to hospital records, to identify patients who underwent primary unilateral hip or knee arthroplasty. Daily step counts from 4 to 12 months post-operatively were extracted using validated algorithms. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to demographic and clinical variables to reduce dimensionality, followed by clustering using k-means and Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM). The optimal number of clusters was determined using the elbow method and silhouette score. Clustering validity was assessed using the Rand Index and Adjusted Rand Index.

Results: 237 patients were included, the majority of whom were female, with a mean age of 66 years. Based on the elbow plot and the highest average silhouette width, a two-cluster solution was deemed optimal, consistently emerging across both clustering methods as distinct high-and low-performing physical activity profiles. High performers had significantly higher daily step counts (mean > 10,000 vs. < 6,000, P < 0.001), were younger, had a lower body mass index, fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to have undergone total hip replacement. Sociodemographic factors such as higher educational attainment and lower deprivation index were also associated with the high-performing group. The clustering methods demonstrated a weak-but-positive agreement (ARI = 0.224).

Conclusion: Unsupervised learning of accelerometer-derived physical activity data revealed two clinically meaningful recovery profiles following joint arthroplasty. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of post-operative recovery and support the development of personalised rehabilitation strategies to improve outcomes in lower limb arthroplasty patients. Video Abstract.

无监督机器学习模型揭示了关节置换术患者术后两种不同的身体活动概况:英国生物银行队列研究。
目的:识别和描述关节置换术患者术后不同的身体活动特征。方法:这项队列研究利用来自英国生物银行的腕带加速度计数据,并与医院记录相关联,以确定接受原发性单侧髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者。使用经过验证的算法提取术后4至12个月的每日步数。采用主成分分析(PCA)对人口统计学和临床变量进行降维,然后采用k-均值聚类和中间分割(PAM)聚类。采用肘部法和轮廓评分法确定最佳簇数。采用Rand指数和调整后的Rand指数评估聚类效度。结果:237例患者入组,以女性为主,平均年龄66岁。基于肘形图和最高平均轮廓宽度,双聚类解决方案被认为是最佳的,在两种聚类方法中不断出现不同的高表现和低表现身体活动剖面。结论:无监督学习的加速度计衍生的身体活动数据揭示了关节成形术后两种有临床意义的恢复情况。这些发现强调了术后恢复的多因素性质,并支持个性化康复策略的发展,以改善下肢关节置换术患者的预后。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书