A Scoping Review of the Equivalent Air Depth Concept.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01
Jan Risberg, Kåre Segadal, Mikael Gennser
{"title":"A Scoping Review of the Equivalent Air Depth Concept.","authors":"Jan Risberg, Kåre Segadal, Mikael Gennser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surface-oriented diving with nitrogen-oxygen breathing gases (nitrox) other than air will commonly be planned according to the Equivalent Air Depth (EAD) principle. EAD is the depth at which a diver breathing air will inhale the same pN₂ as the nitrox-breathing diver. Using conventional air decompression tables based on the EAD depth will allow longer bottom times or shorter decompression times compared to air breathing at the same water depth. This scoping review aimed to investigate the validity of the EAD principle. A literature review identified 13 eligible studies that reported DCS incidence or vascular bubbles following air and nitrox exposures in humans and experimental animals. Four experimental (N=1,597 mandives) and two epidemiological (N=249,109 mandives) studies on humans did not disclose a higher DCS incidence or bubble scores following nitrox dives compared to air dives of similar EAD. Seven experimental animal studies consistently showed that a high pO₂ (>2 atm) increased DCS susceptibility in goats and rats. This can likely be explained by the reduction of the \"oxygen window\" due to the high tissue and venous pO₂. There is insufficient data from animal studies to conclude whether this can be reproduced within a pO₂ range applicable for human operational diving (<1.6 atm). There is presently no reason to modify the EAD principle for manned diving. Still, we would advise improving the monitoring of operational nitrox dives to confirm that nitrox dives have a DCS incidence similar to that of EAD- and bottom time-matched air dives.</p>","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"52 3","pages":"239-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surface-oriented diving with nitrogen-oxygen breathing gases (nitrox) other than air will commonly be planned according to the Equivalent Air Depth (EAD) principle. EAD is the depth at which a diver breathing air will inhale the same pN₂ as the nitrox-breathing diver. Using conventional air decompression tables based on the EAD depth will allow longer bottom times or shorter decompression times compared to air breathing at the same water depth. This scoping review aimed to investigate the validity of the EAD principle. A literature review identified 13 eligible studies that reported DCS incidence or vascular bubbles following air and nitrox exposures in humans and experimental animals. Four experimental (N=1,597 mandives) and two epidemiological (N=249,109 mandives) studies on humans did not disclose a higher DCS incidence or bubble scores following nitrox dives compared to air dives of similar EAD. Seven experimental animal studies consistently showed that a high pO₂ (>2 atm) increased DCS susceptibility in goats and rats. This can likely be explained by the reduction of the "oxygen window" due to the high tissue and venous pO₂. There is insufficient data from animal studies to conclude whether this can be reproduced within a pO₂ range applicable for human operational diving (<1.6 atm). There is presently no reason to modify the EAD principle for manned diving. Still, we would advise improving the monitoring of operational nitrox dives to confirm that nitrox dives have a DCS incidence similar to that of EAD- and bottom time-matched air dives.

等效空气深度概念的范围检讨。
使用氮气-氧气呼吸气体(nitrox)而不是空气进行面向水面的潜水,通常将根据等效空气深度(EAD)原则进行计划。EAD是呼吸空气的潜水员与呼吸氮气的潜水员吸入相同pN₂的深度。与在相同水深下呼吸空气相比,使用基于EAD深度的传统空气减压表将允许更长的下潜时间或更短的减压时间。本综述旨在探讨EAD原则的有效性。文献综述确定了13项符合条件的研究,报告了人类和实验动物暴露于空气和氮气后DCS发病率或血管泡。四项人类实验研究(N=1,597只螳螂)和两项流行病学研究(N=249,109只螳螂)没有发现与类似EAD的空气潜水相比,氮气潜水后DCS发病率或气泡评分更高。7项实验动物研究一致表明,高pO 2 (bbb2atm)增加了山羊和大鼠的DCS易感性。这可能是由于组织和静脉pO₂含量高导致“氧气窗口”减少所致。动物研究的数据不足,无法断定这是否可以在适用于人类操作潜水的po2范围内重现(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 医学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal accepts manuscripts for publication that are related to the areas of diving research and physiology, hyperbaric medicine and oxygen therapy, submarine medicine, naval medicine and clinical research related to the above topics. To be considered for UHM scientific papers must deal with significant and new research in an area related to biological, physical and clinical phenomena related to the above environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书