German-learning infants recognize common nouns without additional frequency cues

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Infant Behavior & Development Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102160
Jessica N. Steil, Ulrike Schild, Claudia K. Friedrich
{"title":"German-learning infants recognize common nouns without additional frequency cues","authors":"Jessica N. Steil,&nbsp;Ulrike Schild,&nbsp;Claudia K. Friedrich","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The success of infants in fixating on a named target when they see it together with a distracting stimulus in the “looking while listening” (LWL) paradigm varies between studies using different stimulus material, participants, and target languages. This calls for systematic investigation of aspects that could influence infants’ LWL performance. In this preregistered online study, we tested the hypothesis that an imbalance in word frequency between target and distractor words could help young infants match more frequently heard words with presumably more frequent referents. We tested 80 German-learning infants aged 6–24 months, divided into a younger group (6–14 months, <em>n</em> = 43) and an older group (15–24 months, <em>n</em> = 37). We systematically manipulated frequency imbalance within target-distractor pairs and found evidence of successful target fixations in both groups. The preregistered analysis of younger children’s data revealed no differences for the same targets presented in imbalanced versus balanced pairs. This suggests that infants did not rely on frequency cues to distinguish between target and distractor objects, and that early noun-object associations are semantically more robust than previously assumed. We discuss limitations of the results due to variations in trial duration and word frequency estimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638325001341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The success of infants in fixating on a named target when they see it together with a distracting stimulus in the “looking while listening” (LWL) paradigm varies between studies using different stimulus material, participants, and target languages. This calls for systematic investigation of aspects that could influence infants’ LWL performance. In this preregistered online study, we tested the hypothesis that an imbalance in word frequency between target and distractor words could help young infants match more frequently heard words with presumably more frequent referents. We tested 80 German-learning infants aged 6–24 months, divided into a younger group (6–14 months, n = 43) and an older group (15–24 months, n = 37). We systematically manipulated frequency imbalance within target-distractor pairs and found evidence of successful target fixations in both groups. The preregistered analysis of younger children’s data revealed no differences for the same targets presented in imbalanced versus balanced pairs. This suggests that infants did not rely on frequency cues to distinguish between target and distractor objects, and that early noun-object associations are semantically more robust than previously assumed. We discuss limitations of the results due to variations in trial duration and word frequency estimation.
学德语的婴儿不需要额外的频率提示就能识别常见名词。
在“边看边听”(LWL)范式中,当婴儿看到一个指定的目标时,当他们看到一个分散注意力的刺激时,婴儿注视目标的成功程度在使用不同刺激材料、参与者和目标语言的研究中有所不同。这就需要对可能影响婴儿LWL表现的方面进行系统的调查。在这个预先注册的在线研究中,我们测试了一个假设,即目标词和干扰词之间词频的不平衡可以帮助年幼的婴儿将更频繁听到的词与可能更频繁的指称相匹配。我们测试了80名年龄在6-24 个月的德语学习婴儿,将其分为年幼组(6-14 个月,n = 43)和年长组(15-24 个月,n = 37)。我们系统地控制了目标-干扰物对之间的频率不平衡,并在两组中都发现了成功固定目标的证据。对年幼儿童数据的预登记分析显示,在不平衡对与平衡对中呈现的相同目标没有差异。这表明婴儿不依赖频率线索来区分目标和干扰物,并且早期的名词-客体关联在语义上比之前假设的更强大。我们讨论了由于试验持续时间和词频估计的变化而导致的结果的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书