Impact of a multistep urinary tract infection-focused disease state stewardship initiative on the treatment of asymptomatic urinary presentations: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2025-11-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361251391259
Christian Tyler Pitcock, Danielle Casaus, Sarah E Garvey, Katie Ruf, Donna R Burgess, Jeremy D VanHoose, David S Burgess, Ryan Mynatt, Armaghan-E-Rehman Mansoor, Nicholas Van Sickels, Mitu Karki Maskey, Thein Myint, Aric Schadler, Katie L Wallace
{"title":"Impact of a multistep urinary tract infection-focused disease state stewardship initiative on the treatment of asymptomatic urinary presentations: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Christian Tyler Pitcock, Danielle Casaus, Sarah E Garvey, Katie Ruf, Donna R Burgess, Jeremy D VanHoose, David S Burgess, Ryan Mynatt, Armaghan-E-Rehman Mansoor, Nicholas Van Sickels, Mitu Karki Maskey, Thein Myint, Aric Schadler, Katie L Wallace","doi":"10.1177/20499361251391259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is often overtreated, risking patient harm through unnecessary antimicrobial use and fostering antimicrobial resistance. Despite this, patients continue to be treated for ASB requiring targeted intervention for antimicrobial stewardship teams across health systems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed the impact of a multistep urinary tract infection (UTI)-focused stewardship initiative by comparing the incidence of asymptomatic urinary presentation (AUP) treatment before and after implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients ⩾18 years at University of Kentucky HealthCare who received antimicrobial therapy with a urinalysis (UA) and/or urine culture (UCx) collected for a presumed UTI between January 2023 and March 2023 (pre-implementation) and January 2024 and March 2024 (post-implementation) were included in the study. Our primary outcome was to compare the frequency of AUP treatment between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 288 patients were included in the study, with 144 patients in both the pre- and post-implementation groups. Treatment of AUPs significantly decreased by 12% after initiative implementation (47% pre-implementation vs 35% post-implementation, <i>p</i> = 0.042). Additionally, we observed a significant difference in guideline-adherent management between the two groups (29% pre-implementation vs 44% post-implementation, <i>p</i> = 0.007). Patients were more likely to receive guideline-adherent UTI treatment durations (38% vs 53%, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and guideline-adherent definitive antibiotics (18% vs 35%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) post-implementation compared to pre-implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our stewardship initiative resulted in reduced treatment of AUPs and improved adherence to UTI management guidelines. Overall, a multifaceted stewardship initiative is a successful intervention to decrease the treatment of AUPs and unnecessary antibiotic utilization. However, additional frontline stewardship initiatives are likely warranted to decrease the unnecessary ordering of UAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20499361251391259"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251391259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is often overtreated, risking patient harm through unnecessary antimicrobial use and fostering antimicrobial resistance. Despite this, patients continue to be treated for ASB requiring targeted intervention for antimicrobial stewardship teams across health systems.

Objectives: This study assessed the impact of a multistep urinary tract infection (UTI)-focused stewardship initiative by comparing the incidence of asymptomatic urinary presentation (AUP) treatment before and after implementation.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Patients ⩾18 years at University of Kentucky HealthCare who received antimicrobial therapy with a urinalysis (UA) and/or urine culture (UCx) collected for a presumed UTI between January 2023 and March 2023 (pre-implementation) and January 2024 and March 2024 (post-implementation) were included in the study. Our primary outcome was to compare the frequency of AUP treatment between groups.

Results: Overall, 288 patients were included in the study, with 144 patients in both the pre- and post-implementation groups. Treatment of AUPs significantly decreased by 12% after initiative implementation (47% pre-implementation vs 35% post-implementation, p = 0.042). Additionally, we observed a significant difference in guideline-adherent management between the two groups (29% pre-implementation vs 44% post-implementation, p = 0.007). Patients were more likely to receive guideline-adherent UTI treatment durations (38% vs 53%, p = 0.009) and guideline-adherent definitive antibiotics (18% vs 35%, p < 0.001) post-implementation compared to pre-implementation.

Conclusion: Our stewardship initiative resulted in reduced treatment of AUPs and improved adherence to UTI management guidelines. Overall, a multifaceted stewardship initiative is a successful intervention to decrease the treatment of AUPs and unnecessary antibiotic utilization. However, additional frontline stewardship initiatives are likely warranted to decrease the unnecessary ordering of UAs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多步骤尿路感染疾病状态管理对无症状尿症状治疗的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:无症状细菌性尿症(ASB)经常被过度治疗,通过不必要的抗菌素使用和培养抗菌素耐药性,冒着患者伤害的风险。尽管如此,患者仍在接受ASB治疗,需要跨卫生系统的抗菌素管理团队进行有针对性的干预。目的:本研究通过比较实施前和实施后无症状尿表现(AUP)治疗的发生率,评估以多步骤尿路感染(UTI)为重点的管理倡议的影响。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:在2023年1月至2023年3月(实施前)和2024年1月至2024年3月(实施后)之间为假定的UTI收集了尿液分析(UA)和/或尿液培养(UCx)并接受抗菌治疗的肯塔基大学医疗保健中心的未满18岁的患者被纳入研究。我们的主要结局是比较各组间AUP治疗的频率。结果:总的来说,288例患者被纳入研究,其中144例患者分别属于实施前和实施后组。主动实施后,aup的治疗显著减少了12%(实施前47% vs实施后35%,p = 0.042)。此外,我们观察到两组患者在指南依从性管理方面存在显著差异(实施前29% vs实施后44%,p = 0.007)。患者更有可能接受指南遵循的UTI治疗时间(38%对53%,p = 0.009)和指南遵循的最终抗生素(18%对35%,p)。结论:我们的管理倡议减少了aup的治疗,提高了对UTI管理指南的依从性。总的来说,一个多方面的管理倡议是一个成功的干预措施,以减少治疗aup和不必要的抗生素使用。然而,额外的一线管理措施可能有必要减少不必要的无人机订购。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书