The Possible Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treatment.

Q3 Medicine
Rouan Barakat, Despoina Sidira, Athanasios Stavropoulos, Nikias Konsolas, Andreas Palantzas, Dimitrios Filippou
{"title":"The Possible Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treatment.","authors":"Rouan Barakat, Despoina Sidira, Athanasios Stavropoulos, Nikias Konsolas, Andreas Palantzas, Dimitrios Filippou","doi":"10.5644/ama2006-124.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) represents a significant subset of pancreatic cancers and is characterized by a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Conventional therapies, including chemoradiotherapy, have demonstrated limited success, prompting interest in innovative strategies, such as immunotherapy. This review evaluates the role of immunotherapy in LAPC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For this review, a comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted in August 2024. After applying the exclusion criteria, 26 studies were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced inconsistent clinical outcomes, with modest improvements in progression-free survival and significant side effects. Cancer vaccines, particularly GVAX in combination regimens, have demonstrated potential, as have fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and mKRAS-specific amphiphile vaccines in preclinical and clinical settings. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies targeting various antigens have yielded encouraging outcomes but have faced safety and efficacy challenges. Emerging approaches, including Toll-like receptor agonists, tumor-associated macrophage targeting, and radioimmunotherapy, have also shown preclinical promise but require further study. Despite numerous investigations, the overall impact of immunotherapy on LAPC remains limited. Some combination therapies involving checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and CAR T cells have shown positive outcomes; however, many are hindered by the immunosuppressive environment and toxicity of tumors. Recent studies emphasize the need for further research to refine these strategies and improve treatment options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAPC remains one of the deadliest malignancies, with immunotherapy offering potential but constrained by limited survival benefits and adverse effects. Further studies focusing on novel agents, refined combinations, and overcoming tumor resistance mechanisms are critical to improve outcomes for this challenging disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":38313,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica academica","volume":"54 2","pages":"143-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12739874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica academica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) represents a significant subset of pancreatic cancers and is characterized by a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Conventional therapies, including chemoradiotherapy, have demonstrated limited success, prompting interest in innovative strategies, such as immunotherapy. This review evaluates the role of immunotherapy in LAPC.

Materials and methods: For this review, a comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted in August 2024. After applying the exclusion criteria, 26 studies were included in the analysis.

Results: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced inconsistent clinical outcomes, with modest improvements in progression-free survival and significant side effects. Cancer vaccines, particularly GVAX in combination regimens, have demonstrated potential, as have fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and mKRAS-specific amphiphile vaccines in preclinical and clinical settings. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies targeting various antigens have yielded encouraging outcomes but have faced safety and efficacy challenges. Emerging approaches, including Toll-like receptor agonists, tumor-associated macrophage targeting, and radioimmunotherapy, have also shown preclinical promise but require further study. Despite numerous investigations, the overall impact of immunotherapy on LAPC remains limited. Some combination therapies involving checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and CAR T cells have shown positive outcomes; however, many are hindered by the immunosuppressive environment and toxicity of tumors. Recent studies emphasize the need for further research to refine these strategies and improve treatment options.

Conclusion: LAPC remains one of the deadliest malignancies, with immunotherapy offering potential but constrained by limited survival benefits and adverse effects. Further studies focusing on novel agents, refined combinations, and overcoming tumor resistance mechanisms are critical to improve outcomes for this challenging disease.

免疫治疗在局部晚期胰腺癌治疗中的可能作用。
目的:局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)是胰腺癌的一个重要亚群,其特点是预后差,治疗选择有限。传统疗法,包括放化疗,已经证明了有限的成功,促使人们对创新策略,如免疫疗法的兴趣。本文综述了免疫治疗在LAPC中的作用。材料和方法:本综述于2024年8月对PubMed数据库进行了全面检索。应用排除标准后,26项研究被纳入分析。结果:免疫检查点抑制剂产生了不一致的临床结果,无进展生存期略有改善,副作用显著。癌症疫苗,特别是联合方案中的GVAX,已被证明具有潜力,就像成纤维细胞激活蛋白(FAP)和mkras特异性两亲性疫苗在临床前和临床环境中一样。靶向各种抗原的嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞疗法已经取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但面临安全性和有效性方面的挑战。新兴的方法,包括toll样受体激动剂、肿瘤相关巨噬细胞靶向和放射免疫治疗,也显示出临床前的希望,但需要进一步研究。尽管有大量的研究,免疫治疗对LAPC的总体影响仍然有限。一些涉及检查点抑制剂、疫苗和CAR - T细胞的联合疗法显示出积极的结果;然而,许多人受到免疫抑制环境和肿瘤毒性的阻碍。最近的研究强调需要进一步的研究来完善这些策略和改善治疗方案。结论:LAPC仍然是最致命的恶性肿瘤之一,免疫治疗提供了潜力,但受限于有限的生存益处和不良反应。进一步研究新的药物、改良的组合和克服肿瘤耐药机制对于改善这种具有挑战性的疾病的预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta medica academica
Acta medica academica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书