Atlas of predictive tools and scoring systems for outcomes in patients with posterior urethral valves: A comprehensive review of the literature.

IF 0.9 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-17 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_31_25
Leo Edward Fitzgerald Gradwell, Khalid Fouda Neel, Abdullah Khalid Fouda Neel, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Atlas of predictive tools and scoring systems for outcomes in patients with posterior urethral valves: A comprehensive review of the literature.","authors":"Leo Edward Fitzgerald Gradwell, Khalid Fouda Neel, Abdullah Khalid Fouda Neel, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_31_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posterior urethral valves (PUVs) are a common cause of congenital bladder outlet obstruction and obstructive uropathy in male infants and are a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD)/end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in the pediatric population. Despite this, it remains challenging to predict which patients will go on to develop CKD/ESRF, and thus management and follow-up are left to the discretion of the treating department. Many different methods have been proposed to predict outcomes in these patients and several tools, including predictive scores and models, have been published. Here, we provide an up-to-date summary of the tools currently published. A comprehensive search of literature available on MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify scoring systems, predictive models, and predictive tools relating to progression to CKD/ESRF/bladder dysfunction in patients with PUVs. Six predictive tools were identified and so were included in the analysis. Three are based on clinical/biochemical findings, 2 utilize machine learning/artificial intelligence, and one is purely based on radiological findings. Three out of 6 have undergone some form of external validation. Four provide a numerical risk and 2 stratify patients into risk categories. There are currently 6 predictive tools that have been published that quantify the risk of developing long-term complications associated with PUVs. Further validation is required to establish these scores/predictive models as a clinical standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 4","pages":"223-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_31_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Posterior urethral valves (PUVs) are a common cause of congenital bladder outlet obstruction and obstructive uropathy in male infants and are a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD)/end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in the pediatric population. Despite this, it remains challenging to predict which patients will go on to develop CKD/ESRF, and thus management and follow-up are left to the discretion of the treating department. Many different methods have been proposed to predict outcomes in these patients and several tools, including predictive scores and models, have been published. Here, we provide an up-to-date summary of the tools currently published. A comprehensive search of literature available on MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify scoring systems, predictive models, and predictive tools relating to progression to CKD/ESRF/bladder dysfunction in patients with PUVs. Six predictive tools were identified and so were included in the analysis. Three are based on clinical/biochemical findings, 2 utilize machine learning/artificial intelligence, and one is purely based on radiological findings. Three out of 6 have undergone some form of external validation. Four provide a numerical risk and 2 stratify patients into risk categories. There are currently 6 predictive tools that have been published that quantify the risk of developing long-term complications associated with PUVs. Further validation is required to establish these scores/predictive models as a clinical standard of care.

后尿道瓣膜患者预后预测工具和评分系统图谱:文献综述。
后尿道瓣膜(puv)是男性婴儿先天性膀胱出口梗阻和梗阻性尿病的常见原因,也是儿童慢性肾病(CKD)/终末期肾衰竭(ESRF)的主要原因。尽管如此,预测哪些患者将继续发展为CKD/ESRF仍然具有挑战性,因此管理和随访留给治疗部门自行决定。已经提出了许多不同的方法来预测这些患者的结果,并且已经发表了一些工具,包括预测评分和模型。在这里,我们提供了当前发布的工具的最新摘要。在MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar上进行了全面的文献检索,以确定与puv患者CKD/ESRF/膀胱功能障碍进展相关的评分系统、预测模型和预测工具。确定了六种预测工具,因此纳入了分析。三个基于临床/生化发现,两个利用机器学习/人工智能,一个纯粹基于放射学发现。6个中有3个经历了某种形式的外部验证。其中4个提供数字风险,2个将患者分为风险类别。目前已发表的预测工具有6种,可量化puv相关长期并发症的发生风险。将这些评分/预测模型作为临床护理标准需要进一步的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书