L. Carmier , C. Aube , A. Lecharpentier , W. Lambert , B. Zhang , J. Lavaud , F. Khemissa-Akouz , O. Weber , A. Guibal
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of a Multiparametric Ultrasound Approach for Quantifying Hepatic Steatosis","authors":"L. Carmier , C. Aube , A. Lecharpentier , W. Lambert , B. Zhang , J. Lavaud , F. Khemissa-Akouz , O. Weber , A. Guibal","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Accessible and noninvasive methods are crucial for the detection and monitoring of steatosis. This study assessed the performance of ultrasound <em>via</em> three ultrasound markers—the attenuation coefficient, the backscattering coefficient and speckle statistics—modeled by a Nakagami distribution, using a dual intercostal and subcostal approach. Combining these three ultrasound markers obtained from the inter- and subcostal acquisitions generated the ultrasound-based fat fraction (UFF). The PDFF measured with MRI was used as the gold standard.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>One hundred thirty-three patients were included in this prospective, bicentric study. For both the intercostal and subcostal approaches, the three ultrasound markers were compared with the PDFF and their coefficients of determination were estimated by means of a second-order polynomial fit. The correlation between the UFF and PDFF was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. ROC curves were used to study the performance of UFF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Independently, all three ultrasound markers were well correlated with the PDFF: attenuation coefficient <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.72 (intercostal) and <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.65 (subcostal), backscattering coefficient <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.68 (intercostal) and <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.69 (subcostal), and Nakagami <em>m</em> parameter <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.51 (intercostal) and <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.52 (subcostal). The UFF score was strongly correlated with the PDFF (<em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.79). The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were 0.94 to distinguish between grade S0 and grades ≥ S1 and 0.98 to distinguish between ≤ S1 and ≥ S2.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UFF is strongly correlated with PDFF for steatosis quantification. Combining both intercostal and subcostal measurements improves this correlation with PDFF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"52 2","pages":"Pages 376-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030156292500393X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Accessible and noninvasive methods are crucial for the detection and monitoring of steatosis. This study assessed the performance of ultrasound via three ultrasound markers—the attenuation coefficient, the backscattering coefficient and speckle statistics—modeled by a Nakagami distribution, using a dual intercostal and subcostal approach. Combining these three ultrasound markers obtained from the inter- and subcostal acquisitions generated the ultrasound-based fat fraction (UFF). The PDFF measured with MRI was used as the gold standard.
Materials and methods
One hundred thirty-three patients were included in this prospective, bicentric study. For both the intercostal and subcostal approaches, the three ultrasound markers were compared with the PDFF and their coefficients of determination were estimated by means of a second-order polynomial fit. The correlation between the UFF and PDFF was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. ROC curves were used to study the performance of UFF.
Results
Independently, all three ultrasound markers were well correlated with the PDFF: attenuation coefficient r2 = 0.72 (intercostal) and r2 = 0.65 (subcostal), backscattering coefficient r2 = 0.68 (intercostal) and r2 = 0.69 (subcostal), and Nakagami m parameter r2 = 0.51 (intercostal) and r2 = 0.52 (subcostal). The UFF score was strongly correlated with the PDFF (r2 = 0.79). The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were 0.94 to distinguish between grade S0 and grades ≥ S1 and 0.98 to distinguish between ≤ S1 and ≥ S2.
Conclusion
UFF is strongly correlated with PDFF for steatosis quantification. Combining both intercostal and subcostal measurements improves this correlation with PDFF.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.