Development and Evaluation of a Multiparametric Ultrasound Approach for Quantifying Hepatic Steatosis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
L. Carmier , C. Aube , A. Lecharpentier , W. Lambert , B. Zhang , J. Lavaud , F. Khemissa-Akouz , O. Weber , A. Guibal
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of a Multiparametric Ultrasound Approach for Quantifying Hepatic Steatosis","authors":"L. Carmier ,&nbsp;C. Aube ,&nbsp;A. Lecharpentier ,&nbsp;W. Lambert ,&nbsp;B. Zhang ,&nbsp;J. Lavaud ,&nbsp;F. Khemissa-Akouz ,&nbsp;O. Weber ,&nbsp;A. Guibal","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Accessible and noninvasive methods are crucial for the detection and monitoring of steatosis. This study assessed the performance of ultrasound <em>via</em> three ultrasound markers—the attenuation coefficient, the backscattering coefficient and speckle statistics—modeled by a Nakagami distribution, using a dual intercostal and subcostal approach. Combining these three ultrasound markers obtained from the inter- and subcostal acquisitions generated the ultrasound-based fat fraction (UFF). The PDFF measured with MRI was used as the gold standard.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>One hundred thirty-three patients were included in this prospective, bicentric study. For both the intercostal and subcostal approaches, the three ultrasound markers were compared with the PDFF and their coefficients of determination were estimated by means of a second-order polynomial fit. The correlation between the UFF and PDFF was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. ROC curves were used to study the performance of UFF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Independently, all three ultrasound markers were well correlated with the PDFF: attenuation coefficient <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.72 (intercostal) and <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.65 (subcostal), backscattering coefficient <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.68 (intercostal) and <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.69 (subcostal), and Nakagami <em>m</em> parameter <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.51 (intercostal) and <em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.52 (subcostal). The UFF score was strongly correlated with the PDFF (<em>r<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.79). The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were 0.94 to distinguish between grade S0 and grades ≥ S1 and 0.98 to distinguish between ≤ S1 and ≥ S2.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UFF is strongly correlated with PDFF for steatosis quantification. Combining both intercostal and subcostal measurements improves this correlation with PDFF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"52 2","pages":"Pages 376-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030156292500393X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Accessible and noninvasive methods are crucial for the detection and monitoring of steatosis. This study assessed the performance of ultrasound via three ultrasound markers—the attenuation coefficient, the backscattering coefficient and speckle statistics—modeled by a Nakagami distribution, using a dual intercostal and subcostal approach. Combining these three ultrasound markers obtained from the inter- and subcostal acquisitions generated the ultrasound-based fat fraction (UFF). The PDFF measured with MRI was used as the gold standard.

Materials and methods

One hundred thirty-three patients were included in this prospective, bicentric study. For both the intercostal and subcostal approaches, the three ultrasound markers were compared with the PDFF and their coefficients of determination were estimated by means of a second-order polynomial fit. The correlation between the UFF and PDFF was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. ROC curves were used to study the performance of UFF.

Results

Independently, all three ultrasound markers were well correlated with the PDFF: attenuation coefficient r2 = 0.72 (intercostal) and r2 = 0.65 (subcostal), backscattering coefficient r2 = 0.68 (intercostal) and r2 = 0.69 (subcostal), and Nakagami m parameter r2 = 0.51 (intercostal) and r2 = 0.52 (subcostal). The UFF score was strongly correlated with the PDFF (r2 = 0.79). The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were 0.94 to distinguish between grade S0 and grades ≥ S1 and 0.98 to distinguish between ≤ S1 and ≥ S2.

Conclusion

UFF is strongly correlated with PDFF for steatosis quantification. Combining both intercostal and subcostal measurements improves this correlation with PDFF.
肝脂肪变性多参数超声诊断方法的发展与评价。
目的:方便和无创的方法是检测和监测脂肪变性的关键。本研究通过三个超声标记-衰减系数,后向散射系数和散斑统计量-采用双肋间和肋下方法,通过Nakagami分布建模来评估超声的性能。结合从肋间和肋下采集获得的这三种超声标记物产生超声脂肪分数(UFF)。以MRI测量的PDFF作为金标准。材料和方法:这项前瞻性双中心研究纳入了133例患者。对于肋间和肋下入路,将三种超声标记物与PDFF进行比较,并通过二阶多项式拟合估计其决定系数。使用Pearson相关系数评估UFF和PDFF之间的相关性。采用ROC曲线对UFF的性能进行了研究。结果:3种超声指标与PDFF独立相关:衰减系数r2 = 0.72(肋间)和r2 = 0.65(肋下),后向散射系数r2 = 0.68(肋间)和r2 = 0.69(肋下),Nakagami m参数r2 = 0.51(肋间)和r2 = 0.52(肋下)。UFF评分与PDFF呈正相关(r2 = 0.79)。区分S0级和≥S1级的ROC曲线下面积(auroc)为0.94,区分≤S1级和≥S2级的auroc曲线下面积为0.98。结论:UFF与PDFF在脂肪变性定量分析中的相关性较强。结合肋间和肋下测量可改善PDFF的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书