[Focusing on psychotropic drug interactions - Development of an 11-Item tool to compare interaction databases for psychiatric practice].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2695-6723
Liv Ilgner, Andreas Eckert, Sibylle C Roll, Marjan van den Akker, Andreas Reif, Martina Hahn
{"title":"[Focusing on psychotropic drug interactions - Development of an 11-Item tool to compare interaction databases for psychiatric practice].","authors":"Liv Ilgner, Andreas Eckert, Sibylle C Roll, Marjan van den Akker, Andreas Reif, Martina Hahn","doi":"10.1055/a-2695-6723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective is the development and pilot testing of a evaluation system designed to facilitate the objective and systematic comparison of interaction databases, Especially in the psychiatric context.The study examined medication plans of 104 psychiatric patients. The medication was checked for interactions in twelve databases. A newly developed evaluation system with 11 criteria and a scoring system was used for evaluation.The number of interactions detected differs significantly between the databases. No database achieved the maximum number of points. Paid databases scored better on average (6.4±2,5 points) than free ones (1.5±2,4 points, p=0,009). The best results were achieved by ifap and PGXperts.Psychotropic substances have a high potential for interactions. Using multiple databases is recommended, combined with clinical experience and interdisciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":"52 8","pages":"430-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2695-6723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective is the development and pilot testing of a evaluation system designed to facilitate the objective and systematic comparison of interaction databases, Especially in the psychiatric context.The study examined medication plans of 104 psychiatric patients. The medication was checked for interactions in twelve databases. A newly developed evaluation system with 11 criteria and a scoring system was used for evaluation.The number of interactions detected differs significantly between the databases. No database achieved the maximum number of points. Paid databases scored better on average (6.4±2,5 points) than free ones (1.5±2,4 points, p=0,009). The best results were achieved by ifap and PGXperts.Psychotropic substances have a high potential for interactions. Using multiple databases is recommended, combined with clinical experience and interdisciplinary collaboration.

[专注于精神药物相互作用-开发一个11项工具来比较精神病学实践的相互作用数据库]。
目标是开发和试点测试一个评估系统,旨在促进客观和系统的相互作用数据库的比较,特别是在精神病学背景下。这项研究检查了104名精神病患者的用药计划。在12个数据库中检查药物的相互作用。采用新开发的11项评价标准和计分制度进行评价。检测到的交互数量在数据库之间有很大不同。没有数据库达到最大点数。付费数据库的平均得分(6.4±2.5分)高于免费数据库(1.5±2.4分,p= 0.009)。ifap和pgexperts获得了最好的结果。精神药物具有很高的相互作用潜力。建议使用多个数据库,结合临床经验和跨学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书