The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Emotional Vulnerability Scale.

IF 1 Q4 NURSING
Cagla Ozdemir, Merve Akkus, Nurcan Akbas Gunes
{"title":"The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Emotional Vulnerability Scale.","authors":"Cagla Ozdemir, Merve Akkus, Nurcan Akbas Gunes","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2025-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> The aim of this study was to conduct a Turkish validity and reliability study of the Emotional Vulnerability Scale (EVS). <b>Methods:</b> The study was a cross-sectional study conducted with 370 people aged 18-65 years. Participants completed a sociodemographic form, the EVS, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form, and the Psychological Vulnerability Scale. <b>Results:</b> The mean age in the study was 34.51 ± 8.53 years; 72% of the participants were female. First, a pilot study was conducted with 45 participants to predict the comprehensibility of the questionnaires and the relationship between the scales. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. In our study, coefficient alphas were α = .82 for \"F1: vulnerability to deteriorating relationships,\" α = .81 for \"F2: vulnerability to interpersonal conflict,\" α = .86 for \"F3: vulnerability to criticism or denial,\" and α = .57 for \"F4: vulnerability to self-avoidance.\" In addition, coefficient alpha = .86 was found to have very high reliability for all items. EVS total score and subscales showed a significant positive correlation with all scales and subscales (<i>p</i> < .05). <b>Conclusions:</b> This scale can be used to measure emotional vulnerability of individuals. High levels of vulnerability are associated with difficulties in the assessment and regulation of emotions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"410-417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2025-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The aim of this study was to conduct a Turkish validity and reliability study of the Emotional Vulnerability Scale (EVS). Methods: The study was a cross-sectional study conducted with 370 people aged 18-65 years. Participants completed a sociodemographic form, the EVS, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form, and the Psychological Vulnerability Scale. Results: The mean age in the study was 34.51 ± 8.53 years; 72% of the participants were female. First, a pilot study was conducted with 45 participants to predict the comprehensibility of the questionnaires and the relationship between the scales. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. In our study, coefficient alphas were α = .82 for "F1: vulnerability to deteriorating relationships," α = .81 for "F2: vulnerability to interpersonal conflict," α = .86 for "F3: vulnerability to criticism or denial," and α = .57 for "F4: vulnerability to self-avoidance." In addition, coefficient alpha = .86 was found to have very high reliability for all items. EVS total score and subscales showed a significant positive correlation with all scales and subscales (p < .05). Conclusions: This scale can be used to measure emotional vulnerability of individuals. High levels of vulnerability are associated with difficulties in the assessment and regulation of emotions.

土耳其版情绪脆弱性量表的效度与信度。
背景与目的:本研究的目的是对情绪脆弱性量表(EVS)进行土耳其语效度和信度研究。方法:本研究采用横断面方法学研究,对370名年龄在18-65岁之间的人进行研究。参与者完成了一份社会人口统计表格、EVS、情绪调节困难量表(简表)和心理脆弱性量表。结果:患者平均年龄34.51±8.53岁;72%的参与者是女性。首先,对45名被试进行初步研究,预测问卷的可理解性和量表之间的关系。进行探索性和验证性因素分析。在我们的研究中,Cronbach的alpha值分别为:“F1:对关系恶化的脆弱性”α = 0.82,“F2:对人际冲突的脆弱性”α = 0.81,“F3:对批评或否认的脆弱性”α = 0.86,“F4:对自我回避的脆弱性”α = 0.57。此外,Cronbach's alpha = .86被发现对所有项目都有很高的信度。EVS总分和各量表与EVS总分和各量表均呈显著正相关(p < 0.05)。结论:该量表可用于测量个体的情绪脆弱性。高度的脆弱性与评估和调节情绪的困难有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书