Comparative efficacy of trypanocide brands against experimental Trypanosoma brucei brucei infections in mice.

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology
Journal of Parasitic Diseases Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1007/s12639-025-01874-4
M I Okpala, C F Obi, G E Aneru, O O Uzondu, C N Iheagwam, C T Oyiga, I O Ezeh, R C Ezeokonkwo, D N Onah
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of trypanocide brands against experimental <i>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</i> infections in mice.","authors":"M I Okpala, C F Obi, G E Aneru, O O Uzondu, C N Iheagwam, C T Oyiga, I O Ezeh, R C Ezeokonkwo, D N Onah","doi":"10.1007/s12639-025-01874-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>African animal trypanosomosis is a major constraint to livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. Chemotherapy remains the primary control strategy, but the efficacy of various trypanocide brands in circulation in Africa, especially in Nigeria, remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of selected, commonly used commercial brands of diminazene aceturate and isometamidium chloride against experimental <i>Trypanosoma brucei brucei</i> infection in mice. A total of 35 adult male mice were randomly assigned to seven groups of five mice each. Group 1 served as the uninfected control, while groups 2-7 were intraperitoneally (i.p.) infected with 10⁶ trypanosomes. Group 2 was left untreated, while groups 3-5 were treated with diminazene aceturate brands (TrypanocideDA 1-3) respectively at a dose of 7.0 mg/kg on day 13 post-infection (p.i). Groups 6 and 7 received isometamidium chloride brands (TrypanocideISM 1 and 2) respectively at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg on day 13 p.i. Efficacy was assessed through clinical signs, parasitaemia, haematological parameters (PCV, Hb concentration, erythrocyte count, leucocyte counts), parasite clearance time, body weight, rectal temperature, and survival. Parasite clearance was fastest in group 3 (2.4 days post-treatment) compared to other treated groups (3 days post-treatment). Diminazene aceturate-treated groups exhibited shorter relapse times than isometamidium chloride-treated groups. Treatment reversed the reduction in haematological indices across all groups. The study concluded that isometamidium chloride brands demonstrated superior efficacy compared to diminazene aceturate brands in treating <i>T. brucei brucei</i> infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parasitic Diseases","volume":"49 4","pages":"1086-1099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parasitic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-025-01874-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

African animal trypanosomosis is a major constraint to livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. Chemotherapy remains the primary control strategy, but the efficacy of various trypanocide brands in circulation in Africa, especially in Nigeria, remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of selected, commonly used commercial brands of diminazene aceturate and isometamidium chloride against experimental Trypanosoma brucei brucei infection in mice. A total of 35 adult male mice were randomly assigned to seven groups of five mice each. Group 1 served as the uninfected control, while groups 2-7 were intraperitoneally (i.p.) infected with 10⁶ trypanosomes. Group 2 was left untreated, while groups 3-5 were treated with diminazene aceturate brands (TrypanocideDA 1-3) respectively at a dose of 7.0 mg/kg on day 13 post-infection (p.i). Groups 6 and 7 received isometamidium chloride brands (TrypanocideISM 1 and 2) respectively at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg on day 13 p.i. Efficacy was assessed through clinical signs, parasitaemia, haematological parameters (PCV, Hb concentration, erythrocyte count, leucocyte counts), parasite clearance time, body weight, rectal temperature, and survival. Parasite clearance was fastest in group 3 (2.4 days post-treatment) compared to other treated groups (3 days post-treatment). Diminazene aceturate-treated groups exhibited shorter relapse times than isometamidium chloride-treated groups. Treatment reversed the reduction in haematological indices across all groups. The study concluded that isometamidium chloride brands demonstrated superior efficacy compared to diminazene aceturate brands in treating T. brucei brucei infections.

几种杀锥虫剂对小鼠实验性布氏锥虫感染的比较疗效。
非洲动物锥虫病是撒哈拉以南非洲畜牧业生产的主要制约因素。化疗仍然是主要的控制策略,但在非洲,特别是在尼日利亚,流通的各种锥虫杀虫剂品牌的疗效仍不确定。本研究旨在评价和比较精选的常用商业品牌醋酸迪纳苯和氯异异胺对实验性小鼠布氏锥虫感染的疗效。35只成年雄性小鼠被随机分为7组,每组5只。第1组为未感染的对照组,第2 ~ 7组腹腔内感染10⁶锥虫。2组不处理,3-5组在感染后第13天(p.i)分别给予乙酰氨基苯醌(锥虫胺1-3),剂量为7.0 mg/kg。第6组和第7组分别给予盐酸异异胺(锥虫病)1和2,剂量为0.5 mg/kg,第13天p.i。通过临床症状、寄生虫血症、血液学参数(PCV、Hb浓度、红细胞计数、白细胞计数)、寄生虫清除时间、体重、直肠温度和生存率来评估疗效。与其他治疗组(治疗后3天)相比,第3组(治疗后2.4天)的寄生虫清除速度最快。醋酸迪咪那烯治疗组的复发时间比氯异异胺治疗组短。治疗逆转了所有组血液学指标的下降。该研究得出结论,氯异甲酰胺品牌在治疗布氏体感染方面表现出优于醋酸氨基苯乙酯品牌的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Parasitic Diseases
Journal of Parasitic Diseases Immunology and Microbiology-Parasitology
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: The primary constituency of the Journal of Parasitic Diseases is parasitology. It publishes original research papers (pure, applied and clinical), which contribute significantly to any area of parasitology. Research papers on various aspects of cellular and molecular parasitology are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书