Comparisons of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy due to Essential Hypertension and Hypertrophic Non-Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
International heart journal Pub Date : 2025-11-29 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI:10.1536/ihj.25-272
Mareomi Hamada, Sayuri Uga-Yamabe, Shuntaro Ikeda, Akiyoshi Ogimoto
{"title":"Comparisons of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy due to Essential Hypertension and Hypertrophic Non-Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Mareomi Hamada, Sayuri Uga-Yamabe, Shuntaro Ikeda, Akiyoshi Ogimoto","doi":"10.1536/ihj.25-272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Essential hypertension (EH) and hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM) are representative conditions associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We compared the severity and distribution of LVH between these two conditions.This study included 44 patients with EH and 79 with HNCM exhibiting precordial negative T-waves (NTs) without LV heart failure. Electrocardiographic assessments included measurements of SV1 + RV5 and the maximum depth of NTs, and routine echocardiographic indices were measured.The SV1 + RV5 and maximum depth of NTs were greater in HNCM than in EH. A correlation was found between these two indices in both groups, with the correlation slope being 4.8 times steeper in the HNCM group. The difference in correlation slopes was considered to reflect the degree of myocardial ischemia. The maximum depth of NTs was predoinantly recorded in the V6 lead in EH, and the V4 and V5 leads in HNCM. Interventricular septal thickness (IVST) was greater in HNCM, whereas LV posterior wall thickness (PWT) was higher in EH. The IVST/PWT ratios were calculated as 0.91 ± 0.10 in EH and 1.20 ± 0.35 in HNCM (P< 0.0001). No significant difference was found in the LV mass index between the two groups. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the maximum depth of precordial NT and the maximum depth of precordial NT/SV1 + RV5 ratio were 0.967 and 0.952, respectively.LVH was similar between EH and HNCM; however, myocardial ischemia was more severe in HNCM than in EH. The distribution pattern of LVH differed markedly between these two conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"961-967"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.25-272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Essential hypertension (EH) and hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM) are representative conditions associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We compared the severity and distribution of LVH between these two conditions.This study included 44 patients with EH and 79 with HNCM exhibiting precordial negative T-waves (NTs) without LV heart failure. Electrocardiographic assessments included measurements of SV1 + RV5 and the maximum depth of NTs, and routine echocardiographic indices were measured.The SV1 + RV5 and maximum depth of NTs were greater in HNCM than in EH. A correlation was found between these two indices in both groups, with the correlation slope being 4.8 times steeper in the HNCM group. The difference in correlation slopes was considered to reflect the degree of myocardial ischemia. The maximum depth of NTs was predoinantly recorded in the V6 lead in EH, and the V4 and V5 leads in HNCM. Interventricular septal thickness (IVST) was greater in HNCM, whereas LV posterior wall thickness (PWT) was higher in EH. The IVST/PWT ratios were calculated as 0.91 ± 0.10 in EH and 1.20 ± 0.35 in HNCM (P< 0.0001). No significant difference was found in the LV mass index between the two groups. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the maximum depth of precordial NT and the maximum depth of precordial NT/SV1 + RV5 ratio were 0.967 and 0.952, respectively.LVH was similar between EH and HNCM; however, myocardial ischemia was more severe in HNCM than in EH. The distribution pattern of LVH differed markedly between these two conditions.

高血压与肥厚性非梗阻性心肌病左室肥厚的比较。
原发性高血压(EH)和肥厚性非阻塞性心肌病(HNCM)是与左心室肥厚(LVH)相关的代表性疾病。我们比较了两种情况下LVH的严重程度和分布。本研究包括44例EH患者和79例HNCM患者,均表现为心前负t波(nt),无左室心力衰竭。心电图评估包括测量SV1 + RV5和NTs最大深度,并测量常规超声心动图指标。HNCM组SV1 + RV5及最大nt深度均大于EH组。两组均存在相关性,其中HNCM组的相关斜率为其4.8倍。相关斜率的差异可以反映心肌缺血的程度。脑出血患者的最大NTs深度主要记录在V6导联,脑出血患者的V4和V5导联。HNCM的室间隔厚度(IVST)更大,而EH的左室后壁厚度(PWT)更高。EH组IVST/PWT比值为0.91±0.10,HNCM组IVST/PWT比值为1.20±0.35 (P< 0.0001)。两组间左室质量指数无明显差异。心前NT最大深度和心前NT最大深度/SV1 + RV5比值的受者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.967和0.952。EH与HNCM之间LVH相似;HNCM组心肌缺血较EH组严重。两种情况下LVH的分布模式有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书