Can one scoring system fit all? Comparative validation of CAR-HEMATOTOX, ALL-HEMATOTOX, and eIPM for predicting immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity following CAR-T therapy in hematologic malignancies.
{"title":"Can one scoring system fit all? Comparative validation of CAR-HEMATOTOX, ALL-HEMATOTOX, and eIPM for predicting immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity following CAR-T therapy in hematologic malignancies.","authors":"Aoran Zhang, Hao Zheng, Qiannan Shang, Xianying Yin, Yihan Yang, Ya Luo, Tong Su, Xuelin Dou, Ting Zhao, Xuying Pei, Zhuojun Liu, Jin Lu, Xiaohui Zhang, Xiaojun Huang, Xiaodong Mo, Meng Lv, Xiangyu Zhao","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2025.05.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), characterized by prolonged cytopenia and delayed hematopoietic recovery, is a common complication following chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. However, the applicability of existing predictive models, CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) for lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia-HEMATOTOX (ALL-HT) for B-ALL, and the early ICAHT prediction model (eIPM), remains uncertain across different hematologic malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively analyzed 119 patients who received CAR-T therapy between January 2022 and June 2025, including B-ALL (n=62), T-ALL/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (n=25), and multiple myeloma (MM, n=32). The CAR-HT, ALL-HT, and eIPM models were evaluated for their ability to predict ICAHT severity and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grade 3 ICAHT occurred in 32.3% of B-ALL, 40.0% of T-ALL/NHL, and 25.0% of MM patients, while grade 4 rates were 33.9%, 20.0%, and 6.3%, respectively. CAR-HT classified 67.2% of patients as high-risk, and ALL-HT identified 56.3% of ALL/NHL patients as high-risk. In both models, high-risk groups experienced significantly more prolonged neutropenia than low-risk groups (CAR-HT: 17.7 <i>vs</i>. 5.3 d, P<0.001; ALL-HT: 21.3 <i>vs</i>. 7.7 d, P<0.001). Both eIPMpre and eIPMpost strongly correlated with grade 3-4 ICAHT (P<0.001). Importantly, survival analysis showed that eIPMpre stratification distinguished outcomes: 1-year overall survival (OS) was 65% in medium+high-risk <i>vs</i>. 84% in low-risk patients (P=0.006), and 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 44% <i>vs</i>. 73% (P<0.001). Similar predictive accuracy was observed with eIPMpost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAR-HT, ALL-HT, and eIPM models consistently identify patients at high risk for severe ICAHT across B-ALL, T-ALL/NHL, and MM. Among these, the eIPM stands out as a promising universal tool for survival prediction. These models provide valuable prognostic insights that can guide supportive care and inform treatment planning in CAR-T therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"37 5","pages":"705-717"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12603628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2025.05.04","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), characterized by prolonged cytopenia and delayed hematopoietic recovery, is a common complication following chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. However, the applicability of existing predictive models, CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) for lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia-HEMATOTOX (ALL-HT) for B-ALL, and the early ICAHT prediction model (eIPM), remains uncertain across different hematologic malignancies.
Methods: We prospectively analyzed 119 patients who received CAR-T therapy between January 2022 and June 2025, including B-ALL (n=62), T-ALL/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (n=25), and multiple myeloma (MM, n=32). The CAR-HT, ALL-HT, and eIPM models were evaluated for their ability to predict ICAHT severity and survival outcomes.
Results: Grade 3 ICAHT occurred in 32.3% of B-ALL, 40.0% of T-ALL/NHL, and 25.0% of MM patients, while grade 4 rates were 33.9%, 20.0%, and 6.3%, respectively. CAR-HT classified 67.2% of patients as high-risk, and ALL-HT identified 56.3% of ALL/NHL patients as high-risk. In both models, high-risk groups experienced significantly more prolonged neutropenia than low-risk groups (CAR-HT: 17.7 vs. 5.3 d, P<0.001; ALL-HT: 21.3 vs. 7.7 d, P<0.001). Both eIPMpre and eIPMpost strongly correlated with grade 3-4 ICAHT (P<0.001). Importantly, survival analysis showed that eIPMpre stratification distinguished outcomes: 1-year overall survival (OS) was 65% in medium+high-risk vs. 84% in low-risk patients (P=0.006), and 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 44% vs. 73% (P<0.001). Similar predictive accuracy was observed with eIPMpost.
Conclusions: The CAR-HT, ALL-HT, and eIPM models consistently identify patients at high risk for severe ICAHT across B-ALL, T-ALL/NHL, and MM. Among these, the eIPM stands out as a promising universal tool for survival prediction. These models provide valuable prognostic insights that can guide supportive care and inform treatment planning in CAR-T therapy.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013.
CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.