Potato peel-based PBS/PBAT biocomposites: influence of composition and filler content on injection molded properties

IF 9
Susanna Miescher, Florine Schleiffer, Eliane Wegenstein and Selçuk Yildirim
{"title":"Potato peel-based PBS/PBAT biocomposites: influence of composition and filler content on injection molded properties","authors":"Susanna Miescher, Florine Schleiffer, Eliane Wegenstein and Selçuk Yildirim","doi":"10.1039/D5FB00333D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The growing demand for sustainable materials has intensified interest in bio-based and biodegradable polymers as alternatives to fossil-based plastics. This study investigated the development of injection-molded biocomposites based on poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene adipate-<em>co</em>-terephthalate) (PBAT), and their blends, reinforced with 30–70 wt% potato peels (PP), an abundant by-product of food processing. The effects of filler content and polymer composition on thermal, mechanical, and moisture-related properties were systematically evaluated. All composites remained thermally stable below 228 °C, confirming the suitability of PP for melt processing. FTIR spectroscopy showed no evidence of chemical bonding between filler and polymer matrices, although weak physical interactions were observed, particularly in PBS-rich systems. In contrast, blending PBS with PBAT indicated polymer–polymer interactions, suggesting partial compatibilization, as reflected in a 1.8-fold increase in elongation at break. PP addition consistently altered composite structure and significantly enhanced stiffness, with the elastic modulus increasing from 698 to 1825 MPa for PBS (+162%) and from 77 to 1161 MPa for PBAT (+1418%) at 70 wt% PP. Conversely, tensile strength decreased from 35.0 to 10.6 MPa (PBS) and from 17.1 to 6.5 MPa (PBAT), and elongation at break dropped below 3% for all composites containing ≥40 wt% PP. Overall, PBS/PBAT-potato peel composites exhibited more balanced mechanical performance compared to neat PBS or PBAT composites. DSC analysis revealed that PP acted as a nucleating agent in PBS and PBS-rich blends, increasing crystallization temperature with only minor impact on overall crystallinity. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of producing high-filler-content biocomposites for sustainable packaging and agricultural materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":101198,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Food Technology","volume":" 6","pages":" 2308-2320"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/fb/d5fb00333d?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fb/d5fb00333d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable materials has intensified interest in bio-based and biodegradable polymers as alternatives to fossil-based plastics. This study investigated the development of injection-molded biocomposites based on poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), and their blends, reinforced with 30–70 wt% potato peels (PP), an abundant by-product of food processing. The effects of filler content and polymer composition on thermal, mechanical, and moisture-related properties were systematically evaluated. All composites remained thermally stable below 228 °C, confirming the suitability of PP for melt processing. FTIR spectroscopy showed no evidence of chemical bonding between filler and polymer matrices, although weak physical interactions were observed, particularly in PBS-rich systems. In contrast, blending PBS with PBAT indicated polymer–polymer interactions, suggesting partial compatibilization, as reflected in a 1.8-fold increase in elongation at break. PP addition consistently altered composite structure and significantly enhanced stiffness, with the elastic modulus increasing from 698 to 1825 MPa for PBS (+162%) and from 77 to 1161 MPa for PBAT (+1418%) at 70 wt% PP. Conversely, tensile strength decreased from 35.0 to 10.6 MPa (PBS) and from 17.1 to 6.5 MPa (PBAT), and elongation at break dropped below 3% for all composites containing ≥40 wt% PP. Overall, PBS/PBAT-potato peel composites exhibited more balanced mechanical performance compared to neat PBS or PBAT composites. DSC analysis revealed that PP acted as a nucleating agent in PBS and PBS-rich blends, increasing crystallization temperature with only minor impact on overall crystallinity. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of producing high-filler-content biocomposites for sustainable packaging and agricultural materials.

Abstract Image

马铃薯皮基PBS/PBAT生物复合材料:成分和填料含量对注塑成型性能的影响
对可持续材料的需求日益增长,增强了人们对生物基和可生物降解聚合物作为化石基塑料替代品的兴趣。本研究研究了以聚丁二酸丁二酯(PBS)、聚己二酸丁二酯-对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PBAT)及其共混物为基础的注射成型生物复合材料的开发,并以30 - 70%重量%的马铃薯皮(PP)作为增强材料。系统地评价了填料含量和聚合物组成对热学、力学和水分相关性能的影响。所有复合材料在228℃以下保持热稳定,证实了PP适合熔融加工。FTIR光谱显示填料和聚合物基体之间没有化学键,尽管观察到弱的物理相互作用,特别是在富含pbs的体系中。相比之下,PBS与PBAT共混表明聚合物-聚合物相互作用,表明部分相容,断裂伸长率增加1.8倍。PP的加入改变了复合材料的结构,显著提高了复合材料的刚度,当PP含量为70 wt%时,PBS的弹性模量从698增加到1825 MPa (+162%), PBAT的弹性模量从77增加到1161 MPa(+1418%)。相反,拉伸强度从35.0下降到10.6 MPa (PBS),从17.1下降到6.5 MPa (PBAT),所有含PP≥40 wt%的复合材料的断裂伸长率都下降到3%以下。与纯PBS或PBAT复合材料相比,PBS/PBAT-马铃薯皮复合材料表现出更平衡的力学性能。DSC分析显示,PP在PBS和富PBS共混物中起到成核剂的作用,提高结晶温度,但对整体结晶度影响较小。总的来说,这些发现证明了为可持续包装和农业材料生产高填充物含量生物复合材料的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书