The unique impacts of attentional control and experiential avoidance on PTSD symptomatology: Moderation of nonlinear effects

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2025.104908
Lucas Marinack, Alexandria F. Sowers, Robert A. Kaya, Alicia R. Bachtel, Jenna L. Mohr, Joshua D. Clapp
{"title":"The unique impacts of attentional control and experiential avoidance on PTSD symptomatology: Moderation of nonlinear effects","authors":"Lucas Marinack,&nbsp;Alexandria F. Sowers,&nbsp;Robert A. Kaya,&nbsp;Alicia R. Bachtel,&nbsp;Jenna L. Mohr,&nbsp;Joshua D. Clapp","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whereas attentional control has been proposed as a broad-based protective factor for PTSD, data suggest that elevated control may be paradoxically associated with increased symptoms, particularly in the presence of other risk factors. The current study examined the unique and interactive effects of attentional shifting (i.e., the transfer of attention across stimuli) and attentional focusing (i.e., the maintenance of attention on relevant targets) with experiential avoidance on posttrauma symptom clusters, accounting for potential nonlinearities in the influence of shifting and focusing dimensions. Shifting models in survivors of heterogeneous trauma (<em>N</em> = 252; 75 % female; 85.7 % White/Non-Hispanic) identified shifting as a moderator of the linear effect of experiential avoidance on CAPS-5 arousal-reactivity (β = −.16, <em>p</em> = .008), with experiential avoidance holding positive associations with arousal-reactivity through shifting scores reaching 2/3<em>SD</em> above the mean. Focusing models, by contrast, identified experiential avoidance as a moderator of the quadratic effect (x<sup>2</sup>) of focusing on CAPS-5 intrusions (β = .13, <em>p</em> = .010). Data failed to support effects of focusing at low levels of experiential avoidance (-1<em>SD</em>). A curvilinear effect of focusing emerged at average experiential avoidance, however, suggesting reductions in traumatic intrusions with increased focusing to mean values in the sample. At high experiential avoidance (+1<em>SD</em>), intrusions decreased with increases in focusing through average levels, but rebounded in response to focusing capabilities extending beyond the sample mean. Results are consistent with previous research suggesting nonlinearities in the effects of attentional control on posttrauma functioning and point to the importance of specific attentional processes in understanding avenues of risk and resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104908"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000579672500230X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whereas attentional control has been proposed as a broad-based protective factor for PTSD, data suggest that elevated control may be paradoxically associated with increased symptoms, particularly in the presence of other risk factors. The current study examined the unique and interactive effects of attentional shifting (i.e., the transfer of attention across stimuli) and attentional focusing (i.e., the maintenance of attention on relevant targets) with experiential avoidance on posttrauma symptom clusters, accounting for potential nonlinearities in the influence of shifting and focusing dimensions. Shifting models in survivors of heterogeneous trauma (N = 252; 75 % female; 85.7 % White/Non-Hispanic) identified shifting as a moderator of the linear effect of experiential avoidance on CAPS-5 arousal-reactivity (β = −.16, p = .008), with experiential avoidance holding positive associations with arousal-reactivity through shifting scores reaching 2/3SD above the mean. Focusing models, by contrast, identified experiential avoidance as a moderator of the quadratic effect (x2) of focusing on CAPS-5 intrusions (β = .13, p = .010). Data failed to support effects of focusing at low levels of experiential avoidance (-1SD). A curvilinear effect of focusing emerged at average experiential avoidance, however, suggesting reductions in traumatic intrusions with increased focusing to mean values in the sample. At high experiential avoidance (+1SD), intrusions decreased with increases in focusing through average levels, but rebounded in response to focusing capabilities extending beyond the sample mean. Results are consistent with previous research suggesting nonlinearities in the effects of attentional control on posttrauma functioning and point to the importance of specific attentional processes in understanding avenues of risk and resilience.
注意控制和经验回避对PTSD症状的独特影响:非线性效应的调节。
虽然注意力控制被认为是创伤后应激障碍的一个广泛的保护因素,但数据表明,控制水平的提高可能与症状的增加相矛盾,特别是在存在其他风险因素的情况下。目前的研究考察了注意转移(即跨刺激的注意转移)和注意聚焦(即对相关目标的注意维持)与经验回避对创伤后症状集群的独特和相互作用,说明了转移和聚焦维度影响的潜在非线性。异质性创伤幸存者的移位模型(N = 252; 75%为女性;85.7%为白人/非西班牙裔)发现移位是经验回避对cap -5唤醒反应性线性效应的调节因子(β = - 0.16, p = 0.008),通过移位得分高于平均值2/3SD,经验回避与唤醒反应性保持正相关。相比之下,聚焦模型发现,经验回避是聚焦于cap -5入侵的二次效应(x2)的调节因子(β = 0.13, p = 0.010)。数据无法支持低水平的经验回避(-1SD)下的聚焦效应。然而,在平均经验回避中出现了聚焦的曲线效应,这表明随着样本中聚焦的增加,创伤性侵入的减少达到了平均值。在高经验回避(+1SD)水平下,干扰随着聚焦能力的增加而减少,但当聚焦能力超出样本平均值时,干扰会反弹。结果与先前的研究一致,表明注意控制对创伤后功能的影响呈非线性,并指出了特定注意过程在理解风险和恢复途径中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书