Junior doctor medical conferences in the post-Covid era: A mixed-methods study.

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marilena Giannoudi, Paul Crampton, Amaya Ellawala
{"title":"Junior doctor medical conferences in the post-Covid era: A mixed-methods study.","authors":"Marilena Giannoudi, Paul Crampton, Amaya Ellawala","doi":"10.1177/14782715251389277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resident doctors require professional development through conference attendance yet there are major challenges to the ways in which attendance is impacted. The COVID-19 pandemic created a shift in education delivery, including medical conferences moving towards online setting. The aim of the study was to explore the factors influencing conference attendance and the post-COVID-19 implications for the future of conference delivery and professional development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach comprising of an online questionnaire and semi-structured interviews was used. Theoretical sampling was performed to invite UK-based resident doctors to complete the questionnaire. Individuals were then invited to a semi-structured interview to explore their experiences further. Content analysis was performed for questionnaire data and thematic analysis for interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four doctors completed the questionnaire, of these 15 participated in semi-structured interviews. During the COVID-19 pandemic most trainees attended online events, but with the abolition of travel restrictions all were keen to return to the face-to-face format. Motivational learning promoted the drive for conference attendance. Other factors included networking and the attainment of continuous professional development points.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings demonstrate how professional development can be successfully enacted through changes to the delivery of conferences. Virtual conferences promote inclusivity and accessibility for doctors in training. However, the lack of opportunities to network is their main drawback. Whilst face-to-face conferences are considered the most attractive; concerns regarding cost, leave, sustainability and work-life balance affect motivation to attend. The findings have implications for educators, resident doctors and conference organisers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","volume":" ","pages":"262-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715251389277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resident doctors require professional development through conference attendance yet there are major challenges to the ways in which attendance is impacted. The COVID-19 pandemic created a shift in education delivery, including medical conferences moving towards online setting. The aim of the study was to explore the factors influencing conference attendance and the post-COVID-19 implications for the future of conference delivery and professional development.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach comprising of an online questionnaire and semi-structured interviews was used. Theoretical sampling was performed to invite UK-based resident doctors to complete the questionnaire. Individuals were then invited to a semi-structured interview to explore their experiences further. Content analysis was performed for questionnaire data and thematic analysis for interview data.

Results: Seventy-four doctors completed the questionnaire, of these 15 participated in semi-structured interviews. During the COVID-19 pandemic most trainees attended online events, but with the abolition of travel restrictions all were keen to return to the face-to-face format. Motivational learning promoted the drive for conference attendance. Other factors included networking and the attainment of continuous professional development points.

Discussion: The findings demonstrate how professional development can be successfully enacted through changes to the delivery of conferences. Virtual conferences promote inclusivity and accessibility for doctors in training. However, the lack of opportunities to network is their main drawback. Whilst face-to-face conferences are considered the most attractive; concerns regarding cost, leave, sustainability and work-life balance affect motivation to attend. The findings have implications for educators, resident doctors and conference organisers.

后covid时代的初级医生医学会议:一项混合方法研究
导读:住院医生需要通过参加会议来进行专业发展,但在参加会议的方式上存在重大挑战。2019冠状病毒病大流行导致了教育提供方式的转变,包括医学会议转向在线环境。本研究的目的是探讨影响会议出席率的因素以及后covid -19对未来会议交付和专业发展的影响。方法:采用在线问卷和半结构化访谈的混合方法。进行理论抽样,邀请英国住院医生完成问卷调查。然后,参与者被邀请参加一个半结构化的面试,以进一步探索他们的经历。对问卷数据进行内容分析,对访谈数据进行专题分析。结果:74名医生完成了问卷调查,其中15名医生参加了半结构化访谈。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,大多数学员都参加了在线活动,但随着旅行限制的取消,所有学员都渴望回到面对面的形式。动机学习促进了出席会议的动力。其他因素包括网络和获得持续的专业发展点。讨论:研究结果展示了如何通过改变会议的方式来成功实施专业发展。虚拟会议促进了培训医生的包容性和可及性。然而,缺乏社交机会是他们的主要缺点。面对面的会议被认为是最有吸引力的;对成本、休假、可持续性和工作与生活平衡的担忧会影响参加会议的动机。这些发现对教育工作者、住院医生和会议组织者都有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (JRCPE) is the College’s quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, with an international circulation of 8,000. It has three main emphases – clinical medicine, education and medical history. The online JRCPE provides full access to the contents of the print journal and has a number of additional features including advance online publication of recently accepted papers, an online archive, online-only papers, online symposia abstracts, and a series of topic-specific supplements, primarily based on the College’s consensus conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书