Potential Pharmacologic Treatments in Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.9 Q3 Medicine
Korean Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2025-10-24 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e35
Kyeong Deuk An, Chan Yang Noh, Junsoo Jang, Woon Tak Yuh, Il Choi
{"title":"Potential Pharmacologic Treatments in Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Kyeong Deuk An, Chan Yang Noh, Junsoo Jang, Woon Tak Yuh, Il Choi","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains one of the most devastating neurological conditions with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Early surgical decompression has been established as the cornerstone of acute management, yet multiple pharmacologic strategies have been extensively investigated to improve neurological outcomes. High-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate, once widely adopted, ultimately failed to demonstrate consistent efficacy, underscoring the challenges of translating preclinical promise into clinical benefit. Advances in understanding the sequential pathophysiology of SCI, including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, glial scarring, and chronic inhibitory signaling, have broadened therapeutic targets across temporal phases of injury. In this narrative review, we revisit historical pharmacologic therapies such as corticosteroids, and highlight current and emerging candidates including riluzole, minocycline, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and biologics targeting the Rho/ROCK pathway (Cethrin, anti-Nogo-A, and anti-repulsive guidance molecule A antibodies). Although compelling preclinical evidence exists, most clinical trials have been limited by patient heterogeneity, narrow therapeutic time windows, and outcome assessment challenges, preventing any drug from achieving guideline-level endorsement. Future success will likely depend on tailored multimodal regimens according to patient stratification, optimized therapeutic timing and delivery, and integration with surgical decompression, hemodynamic management, rehabilitative interventions, and novel bioengineered strategies. Continued efforts in these directions remain essential to establish pharmacologic therapy as a critical component of multimodal SCI care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"21 4","pages":"237-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12599439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains one of the most devastating neurological conditions with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Early surgical decompression has been established as the cornerstone of acute management, yet multiple pharmacologic strategies have been extensively investigated to improve neurological outcomes. High-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate, once widely adopted, ultimately failed to demonstrate consistent efficacy, underscoring the challenges of translating preclinical promise into clinical benefit. Advances in understanding the sequential pathophysiology of SCI, including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, glial scarring, and chronic inhibitory signaling, have broadened therapeutic targets across temporal phases of injury. In this narrative review, we revisit historical pharmacologic therapies such as corticosteroids, and highlight current and emerging candidates including riluzole, minocycline, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and biologics targeting the Rho/ROCK pathway (Cethrin, anti-Nogo-A, and anti-repulsive guidance molecule A antibodies). Although compelling preclinical evidence exists, most clinical trials have been limited by patient heterogeneity, narrow therapeutic time windows, and outcome assessment challenges, preventing any drug from achieving guideline-level endorsement. Future success will likely depend on tailored multimodal regimens according to patient stratification, optimized therapeutic timing and delivery, and integration with surgical decompression, hemodynamic management, rehabilitative interventions, and novel bioengineered strategies. Continued efforts in these directions remain essential to establish pharmacologic therapy as a critical component of multimodal SCI care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脊髓损伤的潜在药物治疗:叙述性回顾。
脊髓损伤(SCI)仍然是最具破坏性的神经系统疾病之一,预后差,治疗选择有限。早期手术减压已被确立为急性治疗的基石,然而多种药物策略已被广泛研究以改善神经预后。大剂量甲基强的松龙琥珀酸钠,一旦被广泛采用,最终未能表现出一致的疗效,强调了将临床前承诺转化为临床益处的挑战。在了解脊髓损伤的顺序病理生理学,包括兴奋性毒性、氧化应激、炎症、细胞凋亡、神经胶质瘢痕和慢性抑制信号方面的进展,拓宽了跨损伤时间阶段的治疗靶点。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们回顾了历史上的药物治疗方法,如皮质类固醇,并重点介绍了当前和新兴的候选药物,包括利鲁唑、米诺环素、粒细胞集落刺激因子和靶向Rho/ROCK途径的生物制剂(Cethrin、抗nogo -A和抗排斥引导分子A抗体)。尽管存在令人信服的临床前证据,但大多数临床试验受到患者异质性、狭窄的治疗时间窗口和结果评估挑战的限制,使任何药物都无法达到指南级别的认可。未来的成功可能取决于根据患者分层量身定制的多模式方案,优化治疗时间和递送,并与手术减压、血流动力学管理、康复干预和新型生物工程策略相结合。在这些方向上的持续努力对于建立药物治疗作为多模式SCI护理的关键组成部分仍然是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书