Clinical and Radiological Efficacy of Short-Segment In Situ Fixation vs. Long-Segment Fixation and Corpectomy in Young Patients With Traumatic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures.

IF 1.9 Q3 Medicine
Korean Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2025-10-29 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e37
Yoseb Oh, SungHwan Hwang, Shin Won Kwon, Hyung Jin Shin, Sunho Kim
{"title":"Clinical and Radiological Efficacy of Short-Segment <i>In Situ</i> Fixation vs. Long-Segment Fixation and Corpectomy in Young Patients With Traumatic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures.","authors":"Yoseb Oh, SungHwan Hwang, Shin Won Kwon, Hyung Jin Shin, Sunho Kim","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the outcomes of short-segment <i>in situ</i> fixation (SSF), long-segment fixation (LSF), and corpectomy for thoracolumbar burst fractures to identify the optimal fixation method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 67 patients grouped into SSF (n=24), LSF (n=22), and corpectomy (n=21). Clinical and radiological parameters were assessed, including pre- and postoperative hemoglobin, numeric rating scale scores, American Spinal Injury Association scale grades, anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), spinal canal encroachment, Cobb angle, local kyphotic angle, operative time, and blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, the corpectomy group demonstrated significantly lower AVBH (49.7%) and greater spinal canal encroachment (64.9%) compared with the SSF (62.6% and 39.9%) and LSF (58.4% and 43.0%) groups (<i>p</i>=0.006 and <i>p</i><0.001, respectively). Postoperative outcomes were comparable among the three groups. Postoperative AVBH was 19.7 mm, 20.0 mm, and 20.5 mm in the SSF, LSF, and corpectomy groups, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.801). Likewise, postoperative local kyphotic angles were 9.4°, 10.8°, and 7.8°, respectively, showing no statistically significant differences (<i>p</i>=0.499). Effective spinal canal decompression was achieved in all groups. However, the corpectomy group required significantly longer operative times (mean, 343.1 minutes; <i>p</i><0.001) and experienced greater intraoperative blood loss (mean, 1,634.2 cc; <i>p</i>=0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Severe preoperative AVBH loss (≤54.93%) and spinal canal encroachment (≥54.39%) may serve as practical thresholds for selecting corpectomy to achieve adequate decompression. In contrast, when these parameters are within acceptable ranges, SSF may be preferred in younger patients as it is less invasive, requires shorter operative time, and provides outcomes comparable to LSF.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"21 4","pages":"303-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12599459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the outcomes of short-segment in situ fixation (SSF), long-segment fixation (LSF), and corpectomy for thoracolumbar burst fractures to identify the optimal fixation method.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 67 patients grouped into SSF (n=24), LSF (n=22), and corpectomy (n=21). Clinical and radiological parameters were assessed, including pre- and postoperative hemoglobin, numeric rating scale scores, American Spinal Injury Association scale grades, anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), spinal canal encroachment, Cobb angle, local kyphotic angle, operative time, and blood loss.

Results: Preoperatively, the corpectomy group demonstrated significantly lower AVBH (49.7%) and greater spinal canal encroachment (64.9%) compared with the SSF (62.6% and 39.9%) and LSF (58.4% and 43.0%) groups (p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively). Postoperative outcomes were comparable among the three groups. Postoperative AVBH was 19.7 mm, 20.0 mm, and 20.5 mm in the SSF, LSF, and corpectomy groups, respectively (p=0.801). Likewise, postoperative local kyphotic angles were 9.4°, 10.8°, and 7.8°, respectively, showing no statistically significant differences (p=0.499). Effective spinal canal decompression was achieved in all groups. However, the corpectomy group required significantly longer operative times (mean, 343.1 minutes; p<0.001) and experienced greater intraoperative blood loss (mean, 1,634.2 cc; p=0.054).

Conclusion: Severe preoperative AVBH loss (≤54.93%) and spinal canal encroachment (≥54.39%) may serve as practical thresholds for selecting corpectomy to achieve adequate decompression. In contrast, when these parameters are within acceptable ranges, SSF may be preferred in younger patients as it is less invasive, requires shorter operative time, and provides outcomes comparable to LSF.

短节段原位内固定与长节段内固定加椎体切除术治疗青年创伤性胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床及影像学疗效。
目的:本研究比较短节段原位固定(SSF)、长节段固定(LSF)和椎体切除术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的效果,以确定最佳固定方法。方法:回顾性分析67例SSF (n=24)、LSF (n=22)和椎体切除术(n=21)患者。评估临床和放射学参数,包括术前和术后血红蛋白、数值评定量表评分、美国脊髓损伤协会评分、前椎体高度(AVBH)、椎管侵入、Cobb角、局部后凸角、手术时间和出血量。结果:与SSF组(62.6%、39.9%)和LSF组(58.4%、43.0%)相比,椎体切除术组术前AVBH(49.7%)和椎管侵犯(64.9%)明显降低(p=0.006、pp=0.801)。术后局部后凸角分别为9.4°、10.8°和7.8°,差异无统计学意义(p=0.499)。所有组均获得有效的椎管减压。然而,椎体切除术组需要更长的手术时间(平均343.1分钟,pp=0.054)。结论:术前AVBH严重损失(≤54.93%)和椎管侵犯(≥54.39%)可作为选择椎体切除术以实现充分减压的实用阈值。相反,当这些参数在可接受范围内时,SSF可能更适合年轻患者,因为它侵入性较小,需要更短的手术时间,并且提供与LSF相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书