A comprehensive analysis of female participation in cardiovascular trials involving the WCN investigator network.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Netherlands Heart Journal Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s12471-025-01999-4
Marte F van der Bijl, Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep, Astrid Schut, Iris C D Westendorp, Yolande Appelman, Hester M den Ruijter, Eric Boersma
{"title":"A comprehensive analysis of female participation in cardiovascular trials involving the WCN investigator network.","authors":"Marte F van der Bijl, Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep, Astrid Schut, Iris C D Westendorp, Yolande Appelman, Hester M den Ruijter, Eric Boersma","doi":"10.1007/s12471-025-01999-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies showed underrepresentation of females in cardiovascular disease (CVD) clinical trials, potentially hindering accurate treatment effect estimates. We assessed the female contribution to treatment effect estimates in selected CVD trials and explored sex differences in efficacy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed completed (1997-2024) randomized controlled CVD trials performed via the Dutch WCN Investigator Network. Female participation was quantified using the Participation to Prevalence (in the population) Ratio (PPR<sub>F</sub>). In trials with a cardiovascular event as the primary efficacy endpoint, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in treatment effect on the study-specific primary endpoint between females and males using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 115 trials investigating various treatments across different cardiovascular domains (801 k participants, 29.1% females), the median PPR<sub>F</sub> was 0.75 (interquartile range: 0.64-0.83), while 58% of trials had a PPR<sub>F</sub> below 0.8 (underrepresentation). Based on 46 trials, female contribution to primary endpoints was lower than their sample size contribution (mean 26.2% versus 28.5%). Similarly, based on 66 trials, female contribution to sex-stratified efficacy estimates was lower than their sample size contribution (27.4% versus 29.2%). Regarding the primary endpoint, the relative treatment effect was similar in females and males: pooled difference of the relative effect measure on the natural log scale of -0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.01, p = 0.23, I<sup>2</sup> = 11%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite underrepresentation, female participation in the selected WCN-CVD trials was sufficient to exclude major sex differences in efficacy. Given the limited and heterogeneous trial sample, further disease-specific studies are needed, and greater female inclusion remains essential for equity and safety insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"404-411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12638513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-025-01999-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior studies showed underrepresentation of females in cardiovascular disease (CVD) clinical trials, potentially hindering accurate treatment effect estimates. We assessed the female contribution to treatment effect estimates in selected CVD trials and explored sex differences in efficacy outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed completed (1997-2024) randomized controlled CVD trials performed via the Dutch WCN Investigator Network. Female participation was quantified using the Participation to Prevalence (in the population) Ratio (PPRF). In trials with a cardiovascular event as the primary efficacy endpoint, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in treatment effect on the study-specific primary endpoint between females and males using a random-effects model.

Results: In 115 trials investigating various treatments across different cardiovascular domains (801 k participants, 29.1% females), the median PPRF was 0.75 (interquartile range: 0.64-0.83), while 58% of trials had a PPRF below 0.8 (underrepresentation). Based on 46 trials, female contribution to primary endpoints was lower than their sample size contribution (mean 26.2% versus 28.5%). Similarly, based on 66 trials, female contribution to sex-stratified efficacy estimates was lower than their sample size contribution (27.4% versus 29.2%). Regarding the primary endpoint, the relative treatment effect was similar in females and males: pooled difference of the relative effect measure on the natural log scale of -0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.01, p = 0.23, I2 = 11%.

Conclusion: Despite underrepresentation, female participation in the selected WCN-CVD trials was sufficient to exclude major sex differences in efficacy. Given the limited and heterogeneous trial sample, further disease-specific studies are needed, and greater female inclusion remains essential for equity and safety insights.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

涉及WCN研究者网络的女性参与心血管试验的综合分析。
背景:先前的研究表明,女性在心血管疾病(CVD)临床试验中的代表性不足,可能阻碍准确的治疗效果估计。我们在选定的心血管疾病试验中评估了女性对治疗效果估计的贡献,并探讨了疗效结果的性别差异。方法:我们分析了通过荷兰WCN调查员网络完成的(1997-2024)随机对照心血管疾病试验。使用参与率与患病率(人口)比率(PPRF)对女性参与率进行量化。在以心血管事件为主要疗效终点的试验中,使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,以评估女性和男性在研究特异性主要终点的治疗效果差异。结果:在115项研究不同心血管领域的各种治疗方法的试验中(801 k参与者,29.1%女性),中位PPRF为0.75(四分位数范围:0.64-0.83),而58%的试验的PPRF低于0.8(代表性不足)。基于46项试验,女性对主要终点的贡献低于其样本量的贡献(平均26.2%对28.5%)。同样,基于66项试验,女性对性别分层疗效估计的贡献低于其样本量的贡献(27.4%对29.2%)。关于主要终点,女性和男性的相对治疗效果相似:相对效果测量在自然对数尺度上的合并差异为-0.02,95% CI为-0.05至0.01,p = 0.23,I2 = 11%。结论:尽管代表性不足,女性参与WCN-CVD试验足以排除疗效上的主要性别差异。鉴于有限且异质性的试验样本,需要进一步的疾病特异性研究,并且更多的女性纳入对于公平和安全性见解仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Netherlands Heart Journal
Netherlands Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Netherlands Heart Journal is to contribute to the national and international literature by publishing scientific papers in the field of cardiovascular medicine. It also provides a platform for Continuing Medical Education for cardiologists and those in training for the speciality of cardiology in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Heart Journal is made available to cardiologists, cardiologists in training, cardiopulmonary surgeons, cardiopulmonary surgeons in training, internists and paediatric cardiologists. The journal is the official journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书