Differential Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha by Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
International Journal of Toxicology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI:10.1177/10915818251393212
Mary Helen Kanitz, Cynthia Striley
{"title":"Differential Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha by Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.","authors":"Mary Helen Kanitz, Cynthia Striley","doi":"10.1177/10915818251393212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances (PFAS) are persistent anthropogenic chemicals widely distributed in the environment that are known to have toxic effects in animals and humans following exposure. Some PFAS have been shown to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), a transcription factor involved in lipid metabolism, leading to dyslipidemia or liver toxicity. PFAS comprise a wide range of compounds, and variations in their structural characteristics could reveal important details regarding the level of PPARα activation. In this work, using a Chemically Activated LUciferase eXpression (CALUX) assay, we experimentally tested the PPARα activation efficiency of several PFAS compounds of varying chain lengths and functional groups. Activation and potency were compared across and within PFAS class based on chemical differences. When compounds with the same number of carbons or perfluorinated carbons were compared across class, the rank from high to low activator class remained the same. Perfluorocarboxylated ether was found to be the strongest class, while polyfluorotelomer was the weakest, suggesting the importance of structural features in PPARa activation. Perfluorocarboxylates were consistently better PPARα activators than perfluorosulfonates. Comparing within these 2 classes, the number of perfluorinated carbon atoms better predicted activation than the number of carbon atoms. In the perfluorocarboxylated ether, perfluorocarboxylate, and perfluorosulfonate classes, a direct correlation existed between potency and the percentage of PPARα activation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.702), a novel observation. These findings provide new insights regarding distinct chemical characteristics of PFAS compounds which may be predictive of PPARα activation level.</p>","PeriodicalId":14432,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"258-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818251393212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances (PFAS) are persistent anthropogenic chemicals widely distributed in the environment that are known to have toxic effects in animals and humans following exposure. Some PFAS have been shown to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), a transcription factor involved in lipid metabolism, leading to dyslipidemia or liver toxicity. PFAS comprise a wide range of compounds, and variations in their structural characteristics could reveal important details regarding the level of PPARα activation. In this work, using a Chemically Activated LUciferase eXpression (CALUX) assay, we experimentally tested the PPARα activation efficiency of several PFAS compounds of varying chain lengths and functional groups. Activation and potency were compared across and within PFAS class based on chemical differences. When compounds with the same number of carbons or perfluorinated carbons were compared across class, the rank from high to low activator class remained the same. Perfluorocarboxylated ether was found to be the strongest class, while polyfluorotelomer was the weakest, suggesting the importance of structural features in PPARa activation. Perfluorocarboxylates were consistently better PPARα activators than perfluorosulfonates. Comparing within these 2 classes, the number of perfluorinated carbon atoms better predicted activation than the number of carbon atoms. In the perfluorocarboxylated ether, perfluorocarboxylate, and perfluorosulfonate classes, a direct correlation existed between potency and the percentage of PPARα activation (R2 = 0.702), a novel observation. These findings provide new insights regarding distinct chemical characteristics of PFAS compounds which may be predictive of PPARα activation level.

过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α在全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质中的差异活化。
全氟和多氟烷基化物质(PFAS)是广泛分布于环境中的持久性人为化学品,已知在接触后对动物和人类具有毒性作用。一些PFAS已被证明可以激活过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α (PPARα),这是一种参与脂质代谢的转录因子,导致血脂异常或肝毒性。PFAS包含多种化合物,其结构特征的变化可以揭示有关PPARα激活水平的重要细节。在这项工作中,我们使用化学激活荧光素酶表达(CALUX)实验,实验测试了几种不同链长和官能团的PFAS化合物的PPARα激活效率。基于化学差异,比较了PFAS类间和类内的活化和效力。当对具有相同碳数或全氟化碳的化合物进行跨类比较时,从高到低的激活剂类别的排名保持不变。发现全氟化醚是最强的一类,而多氟端聚体是最弱的一类,这表明结构特征在PPARa活化中的重要性。与全氟磺酸盐相比,全氟羧酸盐始终是更好的PPARα活化剂。比较这两个类别,全氟化碳原子的数量比碳原子的数量更能预测活化。在全氟化醚、全氟化羧酸盐和全氟磺酸类中,效价与PPARα活化百分比之间存在直接相关性(R2 = 0.702),这是一个新的观察结果。这些发现为PFAS化合物的不同化学特性提供了新的见解,这些特性可能预测PPARα的激活水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Toxicology publishes timely, peer-reviewed papers on current topics important to toxicologists. Six bi-monthly issues cover a wide range of topics, including contemporary issues in toxicology, safety assessments, novel approaches to toxicological testing, mechanisms of toxicity, biomarkers, and risk assessment. The Journal also publishes invited reviews on contemporary topics, and features articles based on symposia. In addition, supplemental issues are routinely published on various special topics, including three supplements devoted to contributions from the Cosmetic Review Expert Panel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书