Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid nebulization to control bleeding of hemoptysis: The TXA-NEB randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Indian Journal of Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-12 DOI:10.4103/ijp.ijp_824_25
Aman Agrawal, Deba Prasad Dhibar, Ajay Prakash, B C Sreedhara, Valliappan Muthu, Ashok Kumar Pannu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid nebulization to control bleeding of hemoptysis: The TXA-NEB randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Aman Agrawal, Deba Prasad Dhibar, Ajay Prakash, B C Sreedhara, Valliappan Muthu, Ashok Kumar Pannu","doi":"10.4103/ijp.ijp_824_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) nebulization to control bleeding in hemoptysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 27 participants with hemoptysis received nebulization with TXA (500 mg/5 mL, q 8 hourly for 2 days), and 29 participants with hemoptysis received nebulization with 0.9% normal saline (5 mL, q 8 hourly for 2 days) along with the standard therapy and followed up for 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean percentage decrease in the frequency (63.9% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.012) and quantity (73.4% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.024) of hemoptysis was significantly higher in the TXA group compared to the control group at day 1 but was insignificant at day 2. However, after excluding participants who underwent intervention (N = 11), the improvement in frequency (76.2% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.049) and quantity (85.2% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.021) of hemoptysis was significantly better in the TXA group even at day 2. Out of 56 participants, 24 participants achieved resolution of hemoptysis, which was also significantly (P = 0.003) better in the TXA group (63.0%) compared to the control group (24.1%). No serious adverse drug reaction was observed. Minor cough (37.5%) and throat irritation (33.9%) were observed, which were comparable (P = 0.432) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TXA nebulization, an alternative route of administration, was found to be safe. Prompt nebulization with TXA was effective as bridging therapy in hemoptysis to achieve the immediate goal of bleeding control before definitive intervention planned or performed. Further studies are encouraged to evaluate this novel approach of TXA nebulization. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov PRS ID: NCT05648656.</p>","PeriodicalId":13490,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","volume":"57 6","pages":"392-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12662606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_824_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) nebulization to control bleeding in hemoptysis.

Materials and methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 27 participants with hemoptysis received nebulization with TXA (500 mg/5 mL, q 8 hourly for 2 days), and 29 participants with hemoptysis received nebulization with 0.9% normal saline (5 mL, q 8 hourly for 2 days) along with the standard therapy and followed up for 8 weeks.

Results: The mean percentage decrease in the frequency (63.9% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.012) and quantity (73.4% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.024) of hemoptysis was significantly higher in the TXA group compared to the control group at day 1 but was insignificant at day 2. However, after excluding participants who underwent intervention (N = 11), the improvement in frequency (76.2% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.049) and quantity (85.2% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.021) of hemoptysis was significantly better in the TXA group even at day 2. Out of 56 participants, 24 participants achieved resolution of hemoptysis, which was also significantly (P = 0.003) better in the TXA group (63.0%) compared to the control group (24.1%). No serious adverse drug reaction was observed. Minor cough (37.5%) and throat irritation (33.9%) were observed, which were comparable (P = 0.432) between the groups.

Conclusion: TXA nebulization, an alternative route of administration, was found to be safe. Prompt nebulization with TXA was effective as bridging therapy in hemoptysis to achieve the immediate goal of bleeding control before definitive intervention planned or performed. Further studies are encouraged to evaluate this novel approach of TXA nebulization. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov PRS ID: NCT05648656.

Abstract Image

氨甲环酸雾化控制咯血出血的有效性和安全性:TXA-NEB随机对照临床试验。
目的:评价氨甲环酸(TXA)雾化控制咯血出血的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:在本随机对照临床试验中,27例咯血患者接受TXA雾化治疗(500mg / 5ml, q 8小时,连续2天),29例咯血患者在标准治疗的同时接受0.9%生理盐水雾化治疗(5ml, q 8小时,连续2天),随访8周。结果:在第1天,TXA组咯血频率(63.9% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.012)和咯血量(73.4% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.024)的平均下降百分比显著高于对照组,但在第2天无显著差异。然而,在排除接受干预的参与者(N = 11)后,即使在第2天,TXA组咯血频率(76.2%对50.3%,P = 0.049)和咯血数量(85.2%对58.6%,P = 0.021)的改善也明显更好。在56名参与者中,24名参与者实现了咯血的解决,TXA组(63.0%)与对照组(24.1%)相比也显著(P = 0.003)更好。未见严重药物不良反应。轻度咳嗽(37.5%)和咽喉刺激(33.9%),两组间比较具有可比性(P = 0.432)。结论:TXA雾化是一种安全的给药途径。在明确的干预计划或实施之前,及时雾化TXA作为咯血的桥接治疗是有效的,可以实现出血控制的直接目标。我们鼓励进一步的研究来评估这种新型的TXA雾化方法。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov PRS ID: NCT05648656。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Pharmacology accepts, in English, review articles, articles for educational forum, original research articles (full length and short communications), letter to editor, case reports and interesting fillers. Articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology will be considered. Articles of general interest (e.g. methods, therapeutics, medical education, interesting websites, new drug information and commentary on a recent topic) are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书