Evolutionary insights into provirus-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems in halophilic archaea.

microLife Pub Date : 2025-10-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/femsml/uqaf033
Doron Naki, Uri Gophna
{"title":"Evolutionary insights into provirus-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems in halophilic archaea.","authors":"Doron Naki, Uri Gophna","doi":"10.1093/femsml/uqaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prokaryotic microorganisms coexist with mobile genetic elements (MGEs), which can be both genetic threats and evolutionary catalysts. In <i>Haloferax lucentense</i>, a halophilic archaeon, we have recently identified an unusual genomic arrangement: a complete type I-B CRISPR-Cas system encoded on a megaplasmid and an incomplete type I-B system within an integrated provirus in the main chromosome. The provirus-encoded system lacks the adaptation genes (<i>cas1, cas2</i>, and <i>cas4</i>), suggesting its potential reliance on the megaplasmid-encoded CRISPR-Cas module for the acquisition of new spacers. This arrangement suggests a potential instance of \"adaptive outsourcing,\" where a provirus might leverage a co-resident MGE for a key function. Through comparative genomics, we show that similar proviral CRISPR-Cas systems are found in distantly related haloarchaea (e.g. <i>Natrinema</i> and <i>Halobacterium</i>), indicating probable virus-mediated horizontal transfer and suggesting they may function as mobile defense modules. Phylogenetic analysis highlights distinct evolutionary origins of the two systems: the plasmid system clusters with other <i>Haloferax</i> CRISPR-Cas systems, while the proviral system clusters with those from other genera, consistent with horizontal acquisition. Interestingly, spacer analysis reveals that the proviral systems predominantly target viral sequences, while the plasmid system appears to target both plasmids and viral sequences, a distribution mirroring broader trends observed in other plasmid- and chromosome-encoded CRISPR systems. This observed targeting preference suggests a potential for complementarity that could support a model of cooperative immunity, where each system may protect its genetic \"owner\" from competition and, indirectly, the host.</p>","PeriodicalId":74189,"journal":{"name":"microLife","volume":"6 ","pages":"uqaf033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12596717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"microLife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsml/uqaf033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prokaryotic microorganisms coexist with mobile genetic elements (MGEs), which can be both genetic threats and evolutionary catalysts. In Haloferax lucentense, a halophilic archaeon, we have recently identified an unusual genomic arrangement: a complete type I-B CRISPR-Cas system encoded on a megaplasmid and an incomplete type I-B system within an integrated provirus in the main chromosome. The provirus-encoded system lacks the adaptation genes (cas1, cas2, and cas4), suggesting its potential reliance on the megaplasmid-encoded CRISPR-Cas module for the acquisition of new spacers. This arrangement suggests a potential instance of "adaptive outsourcing," where a provirus might leverage a co-resident MGE for a key function. Through comparative genomics, we show that similar proviral CRISPR-Cas systems are found in distantly related haloarchaea (e.g. Natrinema and Halobacterium), indicating probable virus-mediated horizontal transfer and suggesting they may function as mobile defense modules. Phylogenetic analysis highlights distinct evolutionary origins of the two systems: the plasmid system clusters with other Haloferax CRISPR-Cas systems, while the proviral system clusters with those from other genera, consistent with horizontal acquisition. Interestingly, spacer analysis reveals that the proviral systems predominantly target viral sequences, while the plasmid system appears to target both plasmids and viral sequences, a distribution mirroring broader trends observed in other plasmid- and chromosome-encoded CRISPR systems. This observed targeting preference suggests a potential for complementarity that could support a model of cooperative immunity, where each system may protect its genetic "owner" from competition and, indirectly, the host.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

嗜盐古菌中原病毒编码的CRISPR-Cas系统的进化见解。
原核微生物与可移动遗传因子共存,它们既是遗传威胁,也是进化催化剂。在嗜盐古菌Haloferax lucentense中,我们最近发现了一种不寻常的基因组排列:一个完整的I-B型CRISPR-Cas系统编码在一个巨型质粒上,一个不完整的I-B型系统编码在主染色体上的一个整合的原病毒中。原病毒编码的系统缺乏适应基因(cas1、cas2和cas4),这表明它可能依赖于巨质粒编码的CRISPR-Cas模块来获取新的间隔物。这种安排暗示了一种潜在的“适应性外包”实例,在这种情况下,原病毒可能会利用共同驻留的MGE来实现关键功能。通过比较基因组学,我们发现类似的原病毒CRISPR-Cas系统在远亲的盐古菌(如钠菌和盐杆菌)中发现,这表明可能是病毒介导的水平转移,并表明它们可能起到移动防御模块的作用。系统发育分析强调了这两个系统的不同进化起源:质粒系统与其他Haloferax CRISPR-Cas系统聚集在一起,而原病毒系统与其他属的系统聚集在一起,与水平获取一致。有趣的是,间隔分析显示原病毒系统主要靶向病毒序列,而质粒系统似乎同时靶向质粒和病毒序列,这种分布反映了在其他质粒和染色体编码的CRISPR系统中观察到的更广泛的趋势。这种观察到的靶向偏好表明,存在潜在的互补性,可以支持一种合作免疫模型,其中每个系统都可以保护其遗传“所有者”免受竞争,并间接保护宿主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书