Experiences of supporting primary and community healthcare workers affected by domestic abuse in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2025.2571600
Sandi Dheensa, Gene Feder, Christian Mallen, Alison Gregory
{"title":"Experiences of supporting primary and community healthcare workers affected by domestic abuse in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Sandi Dheensa, Gene Feder, Christian Mallen, Alison Gregory","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2571600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare workers are expected to identify and respond to domestic abuse among patients. However, research has neglected healthcare workers' own experiences of domestic abuse.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Focusing on UK primary and community healthcare workers with formal support roles (e.g. line managers, human resources, employee assistance professionals), this exploratory study aimed to illustrate workplace support offered to healthcare colleagues affected by domestic abuse.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used an online cross-sectional survey with closed and qualitative free-text questions, advertised via mailing lists and social media, targeting healthcare workers. Our mixed methods embedded design involved quantitative descriptive analysis with content analysis of qualitative free text to explain and interrogate results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two people in healthcare roles supporting colleagues responded, mostly from community hospitals, dentistry, and general practice. Few workplaces had staff domestic abuse policies. Support measures were limited. Emotional support, signposting, and adjusted working hours were the most common types of support available. Training on supporting affected colleagues was rare. Few environments had specialist domestic abuse advocates who supported staff. Along with needing policies, training, and in-house support, respondents indicated a need for a cultural shift to address myths about domestic abuse and hierarchical power, particularly regarding healthcare workers who perpetrate abuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite several limitations, including substantial missing data, our work highlights that primary and community healthcare workplaces should explore the implementation of practical and emotional support measures; healthcare-based domestic abuse advocates with staff support; and training on supporting colleagues. Further pan-European comparative research should surface good practice and foster cross-learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2571600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2571600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers are expected to identify and respond to domestic abuse among patients. However, research has neglected healthcare workers' own experiences of domestic abuse.

Objectives: Focusing on UK primary and community healthcare workers with formal support roles (e.g. line managers, human resources, employee assistance professionals), this exploratory study aimed to illustrate workplace support offered to healthcare colleagues affected by domestic abuse.

Method: We used an online cross-sectional survey with closed and qualitative free-text questions, advertised via mailing lists and social media, targeting healthcare workers. Our mixed methods embedded design involved quantitative descriptive analysis with content analysis of qualitative free text to explain and interrogate results.

Results: Sixty-two people in healthcare roles supporting colleagues responded, mostly from community hospitals, dentistry, and general practice. Few workplaces had staff domestic abuse policies. Support measures were limited. Emotional support, signposting, and adjusted working hours were the most common types of support available. Training on supporting affected colleagues was rare. Few environments had specialist domestic abuse advocates who supported staff. Along with needing policies, training, and in-house support, respondents indicated a need for a cultural shift to address myths about domestic abuse and hierarchical power, particularly regarding healthcare workers who perpetrate abuse.

Conclusion: Despite several limitations, including substantial missing data, our work highlights that primary and community healthcare workplaces should explore the implementation of practical and emotional support measures; healthcare-based domestic abuse advocates with staff support; and training on supporting colleagues. Further pan-European comparative research should surface good practice and foster cross-learning.

支持英国受家庭虐待影响的初级和社区卫生保健工作者的经验:一项横断面调查。
背景:卫生保健工作者被期望识别和应对家庭虐待患者。然而,研究忽视了医护人员自己的家庭虐待经历。目的:本探索性研究以具有正式支持角色的英国初级和社区卫生保健工作者(例如部门经理、人力资源、员工援助专业人员)为重点,旨在说明为受家庭暴力影响的卫生保健同事提供的工作场所支持。方法:我们采用了一项在线横断面调查,其中包含封闭的定性自由文本问题,并通过邮件列表和社交媒体进行广告宣传,目标是卫生保健工作者。我们的混合方法嵌入式设计包括定量描述性分析和定性自由文本的内容分析,以解释和询问结果。结果:62名从事医疗保健工作的同事做出了回应,他们大多来自社区医院、牙科和全科诊所。很少有工作场所有员工家暴政策。支持措施有限。情感支持、路标和调整工作时间是最常见的支持类型。关于支持受影响同事的培训很少。很少有环境有支持工作人员的家庭虐待问题专家提倡者。除了需要政策、培训和内部支持外,受访者还表示需要进行文化转变,以解决关于家庭虐待和等级权力的神话,特别是关于实施虐待的卫生保健工作者。结论:尽管存在一些局限性,包括大量缺失数据,但我们的工作强调,初级和社区卫生保健工作场所应探索实施实际和情感支持措施;在工作人员的支持下,以保健为基础的家庭虐待倡导者;培训支持同事。进一步的泛欧比较研究应揭示良好的实践并促进交叉学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书