Implementing a sepsis prediction score in out-of-hours primary care: Feasibility and acceptability study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2025.2574869
Feike J Loots, Lonneke A van Vught, Minou van den Brande, Sophie Jepma, Bryce Renkema, Arthur R H van Zanten, Karin Kaasjager, Ann Van den Bruel, Johannes B Reitsma, Kevin Jenniskens, Abeer Ahmad, Sibyl Anthierens, Roderick P Venekamp
{"title":"Implementing a sepsis prediction score in out-of-hours primary care: Feasibility and acceptability study.","authors":"Feike J Loots, Lonneke A van Vught, Minou van den Brande, Sophie Jepma, Bryce Renkema, Arthur R H van Zanten, Karin Kaasjager, Ann Van den Bruel, Johannes B Reitsma, Kevin Jenniskens, Abeer Ahmad, Sibyl Anthierens, Roderick P Venekamp","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2574869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical scoring systems can help predict sepsis and guide treatment. We developed and validated a new sepsis prediction score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home by a general practitioner (GP) of an out-of-hours (OOH) cooperative.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing this score during OOH home visits.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Theory-informed mixed-methods study at two OOH GP cooperatives in the Netherlands between January and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GPs calculated the sepsis score in adult patients during home visits and completed a questionnaire about uptake and usability. Perspectives and experiences were explored through focus groups and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>106 GPs visited 271 patients at home, of whom 105 were judged acutely ill by the GP. The score's uptake was 77% in all patients and 85% in those acutely ill. 91% of GPs rated the score as convenient to use, and 66% considered the score reliable and accurate. GPs reported that the score influenced their decision to refer the patient to the hospital in 6% (15/271; 11 referred, four not referred) of all cases and 10% (10/105, all referred) in acutely ill. GPs expressed that they did not solely rely on the score but found it helpful to raise sepsis awareness and as an adjunct to clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a new score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home during OOH primary care is feasible, and deemed acceptable and useful by GPs, however future research focusing on clinical validation and cost-effectiveness is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2574869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2574869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical scoring systems can help predict sepsis and guide treatment. We developed and validated a new sepsis prediction score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home by a general practitioner (GP) of an out-of-hours (OOH) cooperative.

Aim: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing this score during OOH home visits.

Design and setting: Theory-informed mixed-methods study at two OOH GP cooperatives in the Netherlands between January and June 2024.

Method: GPs calculated the sepsis score in adult patients during home visits and completed a questionnaire about uptake and usability. Perspectives and experiences were explored through focus groups and semi-structured interviews.

Results: 106 GPs visited 271 patients at home, of whom 105 were judged acutely ill by the GP. The score's uptake was 77% in all patients and 85% in those acutely ill. 91% of GPs rated the score as convenient to use, and 66% considered the score reliable and accurate. GPs reported that the score influenced their decision to refer the patient to the hospital in 6% (15/271; 11 referred, four not referred) of all cases and 10% (10/105, all referred) in acutely ill. GPs expressed that they did not solely rely on the score but found it helpful to raise sepsis awareness and as an adjunct to clinical decision-making.

Conclusion: Implementing a new score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home during OOH primary care is feasible, and deemed acceptable and useful by GPs, however future research focusing on clinical validation and cost-effectiveness is needed.

在非工作时间初级保健中实施脓毒症预测评分:可行性和可接受性研究。
背景:临床评分系统可以帮助预测败血症并指导治疗。我们开发并验证了一种新的脓毒症预测评分,用于由非工作时间(OOH)合作社的全科医生(GP)在家访问的急性成年患者。目的:评估在户外家访中实施该评分的可行性和可接受性。设计和设置:2024年1月至6月期间,在荷兰的两个户外GP合作社进行了理论信息混合方法研究。方法:全科医生在家访时计算成年患者脓毒症评分,并填写一份关于吸收性和可用性的问卷。通过焦点小组和半结构化访谈探讨观点和经验。结果:106名全科医生上门拜访了271名患者,其中105名患者被全科医生诊断为急性疾病。所有患者的评分接受率为77%,急性患者的评分接受率为85%。91%的全科医生认为该评分使用方便,66%的全科医生认为该评分可靠准确。全科医生报告说,在所有病例中,6%(15/271;11例转诊,4例未转诊)和10%(10/105,所有转诊)的患者中,评分影响了他们转诊患者的决定。全科医生表示,他们并不完全依赖评分,但发现它有助于提高败血症意识,并作为临床决策的辅助手段。结论:在户外初级保健期间,对在家就诊的急性成年患者实施新的评分是可行的,并且被全科医生认为是可接受的和有用的,但需要进一步研究临床验证和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书