Feike J Loots, Lonneke A van Vught, Minou van den Brande, Sophie Jepma, Bryce Renkema, Arthur R H van Zanten, Karin Kaasjager, Ann Van den Bruel, Johannes B Reitsma, Kevin Jenniskens, Abeer Ahmad, Sibyl Anthierens, Roderick P Venekamp
{"title":"Implementing a sepsis prediction score in out-of-hours primary care: Feasibility and acceptability study.","authors":"Feike J Loots, Lonneke A van Vught, Minou van den Brande, Sophie Jepma, Bryce Renkema, Arthur R H van Zanten, Karin Kaasjager, Ann Van den Bruel, Johannes B Reitsma, Kevin Jenniskens, Abeer Ahmad, Sibyl Anthierens, Roderick P Venekamp","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2025.2574869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical scoring systems can help predict sepsis and guide treatment. We developed and validated a new sepsis prediction score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home by a general practitioner (GP) of an out-of-hours (OOH) cooperative.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing this score during OOH home visits.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Theory-informed mixed-methods study at two OOH GP cooperatives in the Netherlands between January and June 2024.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GPs calculated the sepsis score in adult patients during home visits and completed a questionnaire about uptake and usability. Perspectives and experiences were explored through focus groups and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>106 GPs visited 271 patients at home, of whom 105 were judged acutely ill by the GP. The score's uptake was 77% in all patients and 85% in those acutely ill. 91% of GPs rated the score as convenient to use, and 66% considered the score reliable and accurate. GPs reported that the score influenced their decision to refer the patient to the hospital in 6% (15/271; 11 referred, four not referred) of all cases and 10% (10/105, all referred) in acutely ill. GPs expressed that they did not solely rely on the score but found it helpful to raise sepsis awareness and as an adjunct to clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a new score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home during OOH primary care is feasible, and deemed acceptable and useful by GPs, however future research focusing on clinical validation and cost-effectiveness is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"2574869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12604108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2025.2574869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Clinical scoring systems can help predict sepsis and guide treatment. We developed and validated a new sepsis prediction score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home by a general practitioner (GP) of an out-of-hours (OOH) cooperative.
Aim: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing this score during OOH home visits.
Design and setting: Theory-informed mixed-methods study at two OOH GP cooperatives in the Netherlands between January and June 2024.
Method: GPs calculated the sepsis score in adult patients during home visits and completed a questionnaire about uptake and usability. Perspectives and experiences were explored through focus groups and semi-structured interviews.
Results: 106 GPs visited 271 patients at home, of whom 105 were judged acutely ill by the GP. The score's uptake was 77% in all patients and 85% in those acutely ill. 91% of GPs rated the score as convenient to use, and 66% considered the score reliable and accurate. GPs reported that the score influenced their decision to refer the patient to the hospital in 6% (15/271; 11 referred, four not referred) of all cases and 10% (10/105, all referred) in acutely ill. GPs expressed that they did not solely rely on the score but found it helpful to raise sepsis awareness and as an adjunct to clinical decision-making.
Conclusion: Implementing a new score for acutely ill adult patients visited at home during OOH primary care is feasible, and deemed acceptable and useful by GPs, however future research focusing on clinical validation and cost-effectiveness is needed.
期刊介绍:
The EJGP aims to:
foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe
stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe.
Scope
The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology.
Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.