RELICT-NI: Replica Detection in Synthetic Neuroimaging-A Study on Noncontrast CT and Time-of-Flight MRA.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Orhun Utku Aydin, Alexander Koch, Adam Hilbert, Jana Rieger, Felix Lohrke, Fujimaro Ishida, Satoru Tanioka, Dietmar Frey
{"title":"RELICT-NI: Replica Detection in Synthetic Neuroimaging-A Study on Noncontrast CT and Time-of-Flight MRA.","authors":"Orhun Utku Aydin, Alexander Koch, Adam Hilbert, Jana Rieger, Felix Lohrke, Fujimaro Ishida, Satoru Tanioka, Dietmar Frey","doi":"10.1007/s12021-025-09745-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Synthetic neuroimaging data has the potential to augment and improve the generalizability of deep learning models. However, memorization in generative models can lead to unintended leakage of sensitive patient information, limiting model utility and jeopardizing patient privacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose RELICT-NI (REpLIca deteCTion-NeuroImaging), a framework for detecting replicas in synthetic neuroimaging datasets. RELICT-NI evaluates image similarity using three complementary approaches: (1) image-level analysis, (2) feature-level analysis via a pretrained medical foundation model, and (3) segmentation-level analysis. RELICT-NI was validated on two clinically relevant neuroimaging use cases: non-contrast head CT with intracerebral hemorrhage (N = 774) and time-of-flight MR angiography of the Circle of Willis (N = 1,782). Expert visual scoring was used as the reference for identifying replicas. Balanced accuracy at the optimal threshold was reported to assess replica classification performance of each method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reference visual rating identified 45 of 50 and 5 of 50 generated images as replicas for the NCCT and TOF-MRA use cases, respectively. For the NCCT use case, both image-level and feature-level analyses achieved perfect replica detection (balanced accuracy = 1) at optimal thresholds. A perfect classification of replicas for the TOF-MRA case was not possible at any threshold, with the segmentation-level analysis achieving the highest balanced accuracy (0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Replica detection is a crucial but often neglected validation step in developing deep generative models in neuroimaging. The proposed RELICT-NI framework provides a standardized, easy-to-use tool for replica detection and aims to facilitate responsible and ethical synthesis of neuroimaging data.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Our developed replica detection framework provides an important step towards standardized and rigorous validation practices of generative models in neuroimaging. Our method promotes the secure sharing of neuroimaging data and facilitates the development of robust deep learning models.</p>","PeriodicalId":49761,"journal":{"name":"Neuroinformatics","volume":"23 4","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-025-09745-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Synthetic neuroimaging data has the potential to augment and improve the generalizability of deep learning models. However, memorization in generative models can lead to unintended leakage of sensitive patient information, limiting model utility and jeopardizing patient privacy.

Methods: We propose RELICT-NI (REpLIca deteCTion-NeuroImaging), a framework for detecting replicas in synthetic neuroimaging datasets. RELICT-NI evaluates image similarity using three complementary approaches: (1) image-level analysis, (2) feature-level analysis via a pretrained medical foundation model, and (3) segmentation-level analysis. RELICT-NI was validated on two clinically relevant neuroimaging use cases: non-contrast head CT with intracerebral hemorrhage (N = 774) and time-of-flight MR angiography of the Circle of Willis (N = 1,782). Expert visual scoring was used as the reference for identifying replicas. Balanced accuracy at the optimal threshold was reported to assess replica classification performance of each method.

Results: The reference visual rating identified 45 of 50 and 5 of 50 generated images as replicas for the NCCT and TOF-MRA use cases, respectively. For the NCCT use case, both image-level and feature-level analyses achieved perfect replica detection (balanced accuracy = 1) at optimal thresholds. A perfect classification of replicas for the TOF-MRA case was not possible at any threshold, with the segmentation-level analysis achieving the highest balanced accuracy (0.79).

Conclusions: Replica detection is a crucial but often neglected validation step in developing deep generative models in neuroimaging. The proposed RELICT-NI framework provides a standardized, easy-to-use tool for replica detection and aims to facilitate responsible and ethical synthesis of neuroimaging data.

Relevance statement: Our developed replica detection framework provides an important step towards standardized and rigorous validation practices of generative models in neuroimaging. Our method promotes the secure sharing of neuroimaging data and facilitates the development of robust deep learning models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

RELICT-NI:合成神经成像中的复制检测——非对比CT和飞行时间MRA的研究。
背景:合成神经成像数据具有增强和提高深度学习模型的可泛化性的潜力。然而,生成模型中的记忆可能导致患者敏感信息的意外泄露,限制了模型的实用性并危及患者隐私。方法:我们提出了RELICT-NI (REpLIca deteCTion-NeuroImaging),这是一个用于检测合成神经成像数据集中的副本的框架。RELICT-NI使用三种互补的方法来评估图像相似性:(1)图像级分析,(2)通过预训练的医学基础模型进行特征级分析,以及(3)分割级分析。RELICT-NI在两个临床相关的神经影像学用例中得到验证:脑出血的非对比头部CT (N = 774)和威利斯圈的飞行时间MR血管造影(N = 1782)。使用专家视觉评分作为识别复制品的参考。在最优阈值下的平衡精度被报道来评估每种方法的副本分类性能。结果:参考视觉评级分别确定了50张生成图像中的45张和50张生成图像中的5张作为NCCT和TOF-MRA用例的复制品。对于NCCT用例,图像级和特征级分析都在最佳阈值下实现了完美的副本检测(平衡精度= 1)。在任何阈值下都不可能对TOF-MRA病例的副本进行完美分类,分割水平分析获得了最高的平衡精度(0.79)。结论:复制检测是神经成像中开发深度生成模型的关键但经常被忽视的验证步骤。拟议的RELICT-NI框架提供了一个标准化的,易于使用的复制检测工具,旨在促进负责任和道德的神经成像数据合成。相关声明:我们开发的副本检测框架为神经成像生成模型的标准化和严格验证实践提供了重要的一步。我们的方法促进了神经成像数据的安全共享,并促进了鲁棒深度学习模型的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroinformatics
Neuroinformatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Neuroinformatics publishes original articles and reviews with an emphasis on data structure and software tools related to analysis, modeling, integration, and sharing in all areas of neuroscience research. The editors particularly invite contributions on: (1) Theory and methodology, including discussions on ontologies, modeling approaches, database design, and meta-analyses; (2) Descriptions of developed databases and software tools, and of the methods for their distribution; (3) Relevant experimental results, such as reports accompanie by the release of massive data sets; (4) Computational simulations of models integrating and organizing complex data; and (5) Neuroengineering approaches, including hardware, robotics, and information theory studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书