The impact of repetitive exposure to low-level blast on neurocognitive function in Canadian Armed Forces' breachers, snipers, and military controls.

IF 3 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alex P Di Battista, Shawn G Rhind, Catherine Tenn, Ann Nakashima, Timothy K Lam, Maria Y Shiu, Kristen King, Simon Ouellet, Oshin Vartanian
{"title":"The impact of repetitive exposure to low-level blast on neurocognitive function in Canadian Armed Forces' breachers, snipers, and military controls.","authors":"Alex P Di Battista, Shawn G Rhind, Catherine Tenn, Ann Nakashima, Timothy K Lam, Maria Y Shiu, Kristen King, Simon Ouellet, Oshin Vartanian","doi":"10.1017/S1355617725101495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether military occupations with repetitive exposure to low-level blast (i.e., breachers and snipers) display poorer neurocognitive status compared to military controls without prior occupational engagement as breachers and/or snipers, and whether that effect is mediated by self-reported mental health symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>With data collected from Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) breachers and snipers and sex- and age-matched CAF controls (<i>n</i> = 112), mental health was assessed using the <i>PCL-5</i> (PTSD) and the <i>Brief Symptoms Inventory</i>, and neurocognitive function based on a set of computerized tasks (i.e., four-choice reaction time task, delayed matching-to-sample, n-back, Stroop). Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) were created to establish a causal framework describing the potential effect of occupation on neurocognitive function while considering mental health. Factor analysis modeling was used to establish the latent construct of neurocognitive function, which was then incorporated into student-<i>t</i> models for effect estimation, following assumptions derived from causal inference principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results demonstrated that it is snipers specifically who displayed lower neurocognitive performance compared to breachers and controls. Critically, this effect was not mediated by mental health status. In fact, mental health was generally better in both breachers and snipers when compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When the focus is on occupations with repetitive exposure to low-level blast, the snipers in particular are impacted most in terms of neurocognitive function. We speculate that this might be due to additional impact of recoil forces exacerbating the effect of blast overpressure on the nervous system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725101495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether military occupations with repetitive exposure to low-level blast (i.e., breachers and snipers) display poorer neurocognitive status compared to military controls without prior occupational engagement as breachers and/or snipers, and whether that effect is mediated by self-reported mental health symptoms.

Method: With data collected from Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) breachers and snipers and sex- and age-matched CAF controls (n = 112), mental health was assessed using the PCL-5 (PTSD) and the Brief Symptoms Inventory, and neurocognitive function based on a set of computerized tasks (i.e., four-choice reaction time task, delayed matching-to-sample, n-back, Stroop). Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) were created to establish a causal framework describing the potential effect of occupation on neurocognitive function while considering mental health. Factor analysis modeling was used to establish the latent construct of neurocognitive function, which was then incorporated into student-t models for effect estimation, following assumptions derived from causal inference principles.

Results: Our results demonstrated that it is snipers specifically who displayed lower neurocognitive performance compared to breachers and controls. Critically, this effect was not mediated by mental health status. In fact, mental health was generally better in both breachers and snipers when compared to controls.

Conclusions: When the focus is on occupations with repetitive exposure to low-level blast, the snipers in particular are impacted most in terms of neurocognitive function. We speculate that this might be due to additional impact of recoil forces exacerbating the effect of blast overpressure on the nervous system.

重复暴露于低水平爆炸对加拿大武装部队破坏者、狙击手和军事控制者神经认知功能的影响。
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估重复性暴露于低水平爆炸(即破坏者和狙击手)的军事职业与没有先前职业接触的军事对照组相比,是否表现出较差的神经认知状态,以及这种影响是否由自我报告的心理健康症状介导。方法:收集来自加拿大武装部队(CAF)破坏者和狙击手以及性别和年龄匹配的CAF对照组(n = 112)的数据,使用PCL-5 (PTSD)和简短症状量表评估心理健康状况,并基于一组计算机化任务(即四选择反应时间任务,延迟匹配样本,n-back, Stroop)评估神经认知功能。有向无环图(dag)的创建是为了建立一个因果框架,描述职业对神经认知功能的潜在影响,同时考虑到心理健康。因子分析模型用于建立神经认知功能的潜在构念,然后将其纳入学生-t模型进行效果估计,并根据因果推理原则得出假设。结果:我们的研究结果表明,与破坏者和对照组相比,狙击手表现出更低的神经认知表现。关键的是,这种影响并不是由心理健康状况介导的。事实上,与对照组相比,破坏者和狙击手的心理健康状况普遍更好。结论:当焦点集中在重复性暴露于低水平爆炸的职业时,狙击手在神经认知功能方面受到的影响最大。我们推测这可能是由于后坐力的额外影响加剧了爆炸超压对神经系统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书