Veränderung der Inanspruchnahme in einem flexiblen und integrierten Modellvorhaben einer Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie nach § 64b SGB V.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Anne Neumann, Martin Seifert, Roman Kliemt, Franziska Claus, Jochen Schmitt, Enno Swart, Fabian Baum
{"title":"Veränderung der Inanspruchnahme in einem flexiblen und integrierten Modellvorhaben einer Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie nach § 64b SGB V.","authors":"Anne Neumann, Martin Seifert, Roman Kliemt, Franziska Claus, Jochen Schmitt, Enno Swart, Fabian Baum","doi":"10.1024/1422-4917/a001054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Changes in the Utilization in a Flexible and Integrated Model Project for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Germany<b>Abstract:</b> <i>Objectives:</i> We tested hypotheses regarding patients in a flexible and integrative care model of a Child and Adolescent Psychiatry unit offering intensive treatment in an outpatient setting (TIBAS) (intervention group, IG) compared to a control group (CG): reduction in inpatient/daycare treatment and length of stay, increase in outpatient care in hospital, lower readmission and emergency admission rates. <i>Method:</i> We included patients treated between 2018 and 2021 based on routine data from the statutory health insurance system. We formed matched comparison groups from structurally similar control clinics using propensity score matching. The comparison of the IG and the CG referred to the year before and after study inclusion. <i>Results:</i> We analyzed data from a total of 1,806 children and adolescents. The evaluation points towards a strengthening of outpatient care in the IG. However, we found no reduction in the duration of inpatient or daycare treatment nor in the length of stay in the IG compared to the CG across all diagnoses, nor did we determine a decrease in readmission or emergency admission rates. <i>Conclusions:</i> The results indicate an intensification of outpatient care in the model hospital, without evidence of its effects on inpatient utilization. Evaluations of patient-related outcomes of the model project with a comparison group will follow.</p>","PeriodicalId":54189,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Kinder-Und Jugendpsychiatrie Und Psychotherapie","volume":" ","pages":"35-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Kinder-Und Jugendpsychiatrie Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a001054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in the Utilization in a Flexible and Integrated Model Project for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in GermanyAbstract: Objectives: We tested hypotheses regarding patients in a flexible and integrative care model of a Child and Adolescent Psychiatry unit offering intensive treatment in an outpatient setting (TIBAS) (intervention group, IG) compared to a control group (CG): reduction in inpatient/daycare treatment and length of stay, increase in outpatient care in hospital, lower readmission and emergency admission rates. Method: We included patients treated between 2018 and 2021 based on routine data from the statutory health insurance system. We formed matched comparison groups from structurally similar control clinics using propensity score matching. The comparison of the IG and the CG referred to the year before and after study inclusion. Results: We analyzed data from a total of 1,806 children and adolescents. The evaluation points towards a strengthening of outpatient care in the IG. However, we found no reduction in the duration of inpatient or daycare treatment nor in the length of stay in the IG compared to the CG across all diagnoses, nor did we determine a decrease in readmission or emergency admission rates. Conclusions: The results indicate an intensification of outpatient care in the model hospital, without evidence of its effects on inpatient utilization. Evaluations of patient-related outcomes of the model project with a comparison group will follow.

根据§64b SGB V改变儿童和青少年精神病学的灵活和综合模型项目的使用。
摘要:目的:与对照组(CG)相比,我们检验了儿童和青少年精神科在门诊提供强化治疗的灵活综合护理模式(TIBAS)(干预组,IG)中的患者的假设。减少住院/日托治疗和住院时间,增加医院门诊治疗,降低再入院率和急诊入院率。方法:基于法定医疗保险系统的常规数据,我们纳入了2018年至2021年期间治疗的患者。我们使用倾向评分匹配从结构相似的对照诊所形成匹配的对照组。IG和CG的比较是指研究纳入前后一年的比较。结果:我们分析了来自1806名儿童和青少年的数据。评估指出,在IG加强门诊护理。然而,我们发现在所有诊断中,与CG相比,IG的住院时间或日托治疗时间或住院时间均未减少,我们也未确定再入院率或急诊入院率的减少。结论:结果表明,该示范医院加强了门诊服务,但没有证据表明其对住院病人的利用有影响。随后将与对照组对模型项目的患者相关结果进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsreferate, Fallberichte, aktuelle Mitteilungen und Buchbesprechungen und informiert laufend über die Arbeit anderer internationaler Fachzeitschriften. Sie ist offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书