Inequalities in the utilisation of curative-intent treatments for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer across urban and rural areas: A population-based study in England
Eva Kagenaar , David G. Lugo-Palacios , Ajay Aggarwal , Andrew Hutchings , Lu Han , Stephen O’Neill , Bernard Rachet , John Edwards , Corinne Faivre-Finn , Richard Grieve
{"title":"Inequalities in the utilisation of curative-intent treatments for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer across urban and rural areas: A population-based study in England","authors":"Eva Kagenaar , David G. Lugo-Palacios , Ajay Aggarwal , Andrew Hutchings , Lu Han , Stephen O’Neill , Bernard Rachet , John Edwards , Corinne Faivre-Finn , Richard Grieve","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aims to assess sociodemographic inequalities in anticancer treatments including curative-intent surgery and curative-intent radiotherapy for people with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), across urban and rural areas.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 38,229 eligible patients with early-stage NSCLC were identified from the English cancer registry and information on anti-cancer treatment (curative-intent surgery, curative-intent radiotherapy, palliative treatment, no anticancer treatment) was extracted from linked data. Multinomial logistic regression models estimated the association of sociodemographic measures with receipt of anticancer treatments, adjusting for case-mix and travel time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Those living in more deprived areas were less likely to receive curative-intent surgery with a mean change in the estimated probability of −11.1 %age points (95 % CI −12.5;-9.6), but more likely to receive curative radiotherapy with a mean change of + 4.3 %age points (95 % CI 3.0;5.6), than those living in the least deprived areas. Compared to those living in the five largest cities, the estimated probability of receiving curative-intent surgery was lower for those living in other urban areas with a mean change of −2.7 %age points (95 % CI −3.7;-0.2), and those living in rural areas, with a mean change of −2.2 %age points (95 % CI −3.7;-0.6). The probability of receiving curative-intent radiotherapy was lower by on average −2.3 %age points (95 % CI −3.2;-1.3) for those living in other urban areas versus the largest cities, but the corresponding reduction for those living in rural areas was small (-0.5 %age points, 95 % CI −1.9;0.1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There are major inequalities in receipt of curative-intent surgery for early-stage NSCLC according to deprivation, and urban versus rural residence with smaller inequalities for receipt of curative-intent radiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Policy Implications</h3><div>The further expansion of radiotherapy services could reduce inequalities in uptake of curative-intent treatment for NSCLC, but the impact on patient outcomes must be assessed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538325001067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aims to assess sociodemographic inequalities in anticancer treatments including curative-intent surgery and curative-intent radiotherapy for people with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), across urban and rural areas.
Methods
A total of 38,229 eligible patients with early-stage NSCLC were identified from the English cancer registry and information on anti-cancer treatment (curative-intent surgery, curative-intent radiotherapy, palliative treatment, no anticancer treatment) was extracted from linked data. Multinomial logistic regression models estimated the association of sociodemographic measures with receipt of anticancer treatments, adjusting for case-mix and travel time.
Results
Those living in more deprived areas were less likely to receive curative-intent surgery with a mean change in the estimated probability of −11.1 %age points (95 % CI −12.5;-9.6), but more likely to receive curative radiotherapy with a mean change of + 4.3 %age points (95 % CI 3.0;5.6), than those living in the least deprived areas. Compared to those living in the five largest cities, the estimated probability of receiving curative-intent surgery was lower for those living in other urban areas with a mean change of −2.7 %age points (95 % CI −3.7;-0.2), and those living in rural areas, with a mean change of −2.2 %age points (95 % CI −3.7;-0.6). The probability of receiving curative-intent radiotherapy was lower by on average −2.3 %age points (95 % CI −3.2;-1.3) for those living in other urban areas versus the largest cities, but the corresponding reduction for those living in rural areas was small (-0.5 %age points, 95 % CI −1.9;0.1).
Conclusion
There are major inequalities in receipt of curative-intent surgery for early-stage NSCLC according to deprivation, and urban versus rural residence with smaller inequalities for receipt of curative-intent radiotherapy.
Policy Implications
The further expansion of radiotherapy services could reduce inequalities in uptake of curative-intent treatment for NSCLC, but the impact on patient outcomes must be assessed.
背景:本研究旨在评估城市和农村地区早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在抗癌治疗方面的社会人口不平等,包括治愈性手术和治愈性放疗。方法:从英国癌症登记处共确定38229例符合条件的早期NSCLC患者,并从相关数据中提取抗癌治疗信息(治愈意图手术,治愈意图放疗,姑息治疗,无抗癌治疗)。多项逻辑回归模型估计了社会人口统计指标与接受抗癌治疗的关系,调整了病例组合和旅行时间。结果:与生活在最贫困地区的患者相比,生活在更贫困地区的患者接受治愈性手术的可能性更小,估计概率平均变化为-11.1个百分点(95% CI -12.5;-9.6),但接受治愈性放疗的可能性更大,平均变化为+4.3个百分点(95% CI 3.0;5.6)。与生活在五个最大城市的患者相比,生活在其他城市地区的患者接受治疗目的手术的估计概率较低,平均变化为-2.7个百分点(95% CI -3.7;-0.2),生活在农村地区的患者平均变化为-2.2个百分点(95% CI -3.7;-0.6)。与大城市相比,生活在其他城市地区的患者接受治疗意图放疗的概率平均降低了-2.3个百分点(95% CI -3.2;-1.3),但生活在农村地区的患者的相应降低幅度很小(-0.5个百分点,95% CI -1.9;0.1)。结论:根据剥夺程度,早期NSCLC在接受治愈性手术方面存在较大的不平等,城市居民与农村居民在接受治愈性放疗方面存在较小的不平等。政策意义:放疗服务的进一步扩大可以减少非小细胞肺癌治疗的不平等,但对患者预后的影响必须进行评估。