Yang Kuo-Shu and the Indigenous Movements of Psychology in China From the Perspective of History

IF 0.7 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Shu Yueyu, Li Jiaming, Wang Zeyu
{"title":"Yang Kuo-Shu and the Indigenous Movements of Psychology in China From the Perspective of History","authors":"Shu Yueyu,&nbsp;Li Jiaming,&nbsp;Wang Zeyu","doi":"10.1002/jhbs.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Yang Kuo-Shu—widely regarded as the <i>Father of Chinese Indigenous Psychology</i>—was the central figure in a four-decade movement that sought to reorient psychological research within Chinese societies toward culturally grounded foundations. The movement succeeded in establishing institutional infrastructures, cultivating successive generations of scholars, and producing a substantial corpus of studies attentive to local meanings and practices. Yet, this article argues that its ultimate aspiration—to construct an autonomous Chinese psychological system—remained unfulfilled. Drawing on extensive archival and historical materials, the study traces the intertwined trajectories of Yang's intellectual career and the indigenization project he led. It contends that the movement's fundamental limitation resided in an unresolved epistemological dependence on Western scientific metaphysics. Despite its anticolonial impetus, it inadvertently reproduced a form of academic self-colonization, remaining confined within the very ontological assumptions it sought to transcend. By situating this paradox within broader debates on decolonization and knowledge production, the article reexamines both the achievements and the enduring dilemmas of psychological indigenization in the Chinese context.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.70044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yang Kuo-Shu—widely regarded as the Father of Chinese Indigenous Psychology—was the central figure in a four-decade movement that sought to reorient psychological research within Chinese societies toward culturally grounded foundations. The movement succeeded in establishing institutional infrastructures, cultivating successive generations of scholars, and producing a substantial corpus of studies attentive to local meanings and practices. Yet, this article argues that its ultimate aspiration—to construct an autonomous Chinese psychological system—remained unfulfilled. Drawing on extensive archival and historical materials, the study traces the intertwined trajectories of Yang's intellectual career and the indigenization project he led. It contends that the movement's fundamental limitation resided in an unresolved epistemological dependence on Western scientific metaphysics. Despite its anticolonial impetus, it inadvertently reproduced a form of academic self-colonization, remaining confined within the very ontological assumptions it sought to transcend. By situating this paradox within broader debates on decolonization and knowledge production, the article reexamines both the achievements and the enduring dilemmas of psychological indigenization in the Chinese context.

从历史的角度看杨国枢与中国本土的心理学运动。
杨国书被广泛认为是中国本土心理学之父,他是一场持续了40年的运动的核心人物,这场运动试图将中国社会的心理学研究重新定位于文化基础。这场运动成功地建立了制度基础,培养了一代又一代的学者,并产生了大量关注当地意义和实践的研究。然而,本文认为其最终目标——构建一个自主的中国心理系统——仍未实现。借助大量的档案和历史材料,该研究追溯了杨的学术生涯和他领导的本土化项目交织在一起的轨迹。它认为,该运动的根本局限在于对西方科学形而上学的认识论依赖。尽管它有反殖民的动力,但它无意中复制了一种学术上的自我殖民形式,仍然局限在它试图超越的本体论假设中。本文将这一悖论置于关于非殖民化和知识生产的广泛辩论中,重新审视中国语境下心理本土化的成就和持久困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to the scientific, technical, institutional, and cultural history of the social and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes research articles, book reviews, and news and notes that cover the development of the core disciplines of psychology, anthropology, sociology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis, economics, linguistics, communications, political science, and the neurosciences. The journal also welcomes papers and book reviews in related fields, particularly the history of science and medicine, historical theory, and historiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书