Effect of cone-opponent modulation on visual discomfort from chromatic flicker

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Vision Research Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2025.108715
Junna Matsumoto , Aiko Morita , Arnold J. Wilkins , Sanae Yoshimoto
{"title":"Effect of cone-opponent modulation on visual discomfort from chromatic flicker","authors":"Junna Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Aiko Morita ,&nbsp;Arnold J. Wilkins ,&nbsp;Sanae Yoshimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Visual patterns with large shifts in chromaticity can be perceived as uncomfortable and may even trigger photosensitive epilepsy. In the temporal domain, not only does large chromatic contrast tend to increase discomfort, but red flicker also appears to evoke strong aversion. The mechanisms underlying this red-specific discomfort, however, remain unclear. To address this issue, the present study measured discomfort ratings for two-color alternating stimuli defined in the MB-DKL cone-opponent space, in which the magnitudes of modulation along the L/(L + M) and S/(L + M) axes were systematically manipulated. We found that modulation along the L/(L + M) axis showed a positive correlation with discomfort ratings, whereas modulation along the S/(L + M) axis also predicted discomfort but with a comparatively weaker effect. We also replicated previous findings that greater temporal chromatic contrast, quantified in a uniform color space, was associated with increased discomfort. Importantly, the relationship between L/(L + M) modulation and discomfort remained robust even when chromatic contrast was controlled. These results suggest that visual discomfort from temporal chromatic variation involves multiple stages of color processing. Specifically, the aversion to red flicker may originate at early stages of cone-opponent processing, prior to the formation of categorical red perception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 108715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698925001762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual patterns with large shifts in chromaticity can be perceived as uncomfortable and may even trigger photosensitive epilepsy. In the temporal domain, not only does large chromatic contrast tend to increase discomfort, but red flicker also appears to evoke strong aversion. The mechanisms underlying this red-specific discomfort, however, remain unclear. To address this issue, the present study measured discomfort ratings for two-color alternating stimuli defined in the MB-DKL cone-opponent space, in which the magnitudes of modulation along the L/(L + M) and S/(L + M) axes were systematically manipulated. We found that modulation along the L/(L + M) axis showed a positive correlation with discomfort ratings, whereas modulation along the S/(L + M) axis also predicted discomfort but with a comparatively weaker effect. We also replicated previous findings that greater temporal chromatic contrast, quantified in a uniform color space, was associated with increased discomfort. Importantly, the relationship between L/(L + M) modulation and discomfort remained robust even when chromatic contrast was controlled. These results suggest that visual discomfort from temporal chromatic variation involves multiple stages of color processing. Specifically, the aversion to red flicker may originate at early stages of cone-opponent processing, prior to the formation of categorical red perception.
视锥对抗调制对色光闪烁视觉不适的影响。
色度变化大的视觉模式可以被认为是不舒服的,甚至可能引发光敏性癫痫。在时间域,不仅大的色差倾向于增加不适,而且红色闪烁也似乎引起强烈的厌恶。然而,这种特定红色的不适背后的机制尚不清楚。为了解决这一问题,本研究测量了在MB-DKL锥体对抗空间中定义的双色交替刺激的不适等级,其中沿L/(L + M)和S/(L + M)轴的调制幅度被系统地操纵。我们发现沿L/(L + M)轴的调制与不适等级呈正相关,而沿S/(L + M)轴的调制也预测不适,但影响相对较弱。我们还重复了先前的研究结果,即在统一的色彩空间中量化的更大的时间色差与增加的不适有关。重要的是,L/(L + M)调制和不适感之间的关系即使在色差控制下也保持稳定。这些结果表明,由时间颜色变化引起的视觉不适涉及多个颜色处理阶段。具体而言,对红色闪烁的厌恶可能起源于锥体对手加工的早期阶段,在明确红色感知形成之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书