The Twinkle-Goes illusion impacts motor planning, and is likely perceptual in origin

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Vision Research Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2025.108714
Blake W. Saurels , Benjamin R. Jilek , Derek H. Arnold
{"title":"The Twinkle-Goes illusion impacts motor planning, and is likely perceptual in origin","authors":"Blake W. Saurels ,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Jilek ,&nbsp;Derek H. Arnold","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Twinkle-Goes illusion is an apparent perceptual extrapolation of moving objects that suddenly disappear. Object disappearance must occur against a white noise background that is dynamically updating, or against an initially static white noise background that becomes dynamic within a brief time window after disappearance. Here, we have refined the critical time window for dynamic noise onset to just ∼ 20 ms after moving object disappearance. We have also successfully measured the illusion using a sensory reproduction task, that minimizes decisional biases that could have influenced the binary forced choice tasks that have previously been used to measure the illusion. This suggests that the Twinkle-Goes illusion is likely perceptual in origin. We also measured the illusion using a task where people made a saccade to the perceived moving object disappearance position, showing the illusion impacts motor planning. The magnitude of the effect in our data was ∼ 22 ms, at most. This is too slight to reflect on full compensation for delayed sensory processing in early visual brain regions (∼67 ms). However, it is possible that our measures have only partially captured the activity of an extrapolation process that is involved in a full compensation for information processing delays, in order to facilitate motor planning – but this possibility remains speculative, and we review counter arguments and evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 108714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698925001750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Twinkle-Goes illusion is an apparent perceptual extrapolation of moving objects that suddenly disappear. Object disappearance must occur against a white noise background that is dynamically updating, or against an initially static white noise background that becomes dynamic within a brief time window after disappearance. Here, we have refined the critical time window for dynamic noise onset to just ∼ 20 ms after moving object disappearance. We have also successfully measured the illusion using a sensory reproduction task, that minimizes decisional biases that could have influenced the binary forced choice tasks that have previously been used to measure the illusion. This suggests that the Twinkle-Goes illusion is likely perceptual in origin. We also measured the illusion using a task where people made a saccade to the perceived moving object disappearance position, showing the illusion impacts motor planning. The magnitude of the effect in our data was ∼ 22 ms, at most. This is too slight to reflect on full compensation for delayed sensory processing in early visual brain regions (∼67 ms). However, it is possible that our measures have only partially captured the activity of an extrapolation process that is involved in a full compensation for information processing delays, in order to facilitate motor planning – but this possibility remains speculative, and we review counter arguments and evidence.
闪烁错觉影响运动计划,可能是感性的起源。
闪烁错觉是一种明显的感知外推,即移动的物体突然消失。对象消失必须在动态更新的白噪声背景下发生,或者在消失后的短时间内变为动态的初始静态白噪声背景下发生。在这里,我们将动态噪声发生的临界时间窗口细化到运动物体消失后仅20毫秒。我们还成功地使用感官再现任务测量了错觉,这将可能影响二元强迫选择任务的决策偏差降至最低,而二元强迫选择任务之前曾被用来测量错觉。这表明,“闪烁”错觉可能源于感知。我们还通过一项任务测量了这种错觉,在这项任务中,人们扫视到感知到的移动物体消失的位置,表明这种错觉影响了运动计划。在我们的数据中,影响的幅度最多为~ 22 ms。这太轻微了,无法反映早期视觉脑区域(~ 67 ms)对延迟感觉处理的完全补偿。然而,为了促进运动规划,我们的措施可能只是部分地捕获了外推过程的活动,这一过程涉及对信息处理延迟的完全补偿,但这种可能性仍然是推测性的,我们回顾了相反的论点和证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书