Blake W. Saurels , Benjamin R. Jilek , Derek H. Arnold
{"title":"The Twinkle-Goes illusion impacts motor planning, and is likely perceptual in origin","authors":"Blake W. Saurels , Benjamin R. Jilek , Derek H. Arnold","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Twinkle-Goes illusion is an apparent perceptual extrapolation of moving objects that suddenly disappear. Object disappearance must occur against a white noise background that is dynamically updating, or against an initially static white noise background that becomes dynamic within a brief time window after disappearance. Here, we have refined the critical time window for dynamic noise onset to just ∼ 20 ms after moving object disappearance. We have also successfully measured the illusion using a sensory reproduction task, that minimizes decisional biases that could have influenced the binary forced choice tasks that have previously been used to measure the illusion. This suggests that the Twinkle-Goes illusion is likely perceptual in origin. We also measured the illusion using a task where people made a saccade to the perceived moving object disappearance position, showing the illusion impacts motor planning. The magnitude of the effect in our data was ∼ 22 ms, at most. This is too slight to reflect on full compensation for delayed sensory processing in early visual brain regions (∼67 ms). However, it is possible that our measures have only partially captured the activity of an extrapolation process that is involved in a full compensation for information processing delays, in order to facilitate motor planning – but this possibility remains speculative, and we review counter arguments and evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 108714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698925001750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Twinkle-Goes illusion is an apparent perceptual extrapolation of moving objects that suddenly disappear. Object disappearance must occur against a white noise background that is dynamically updating, or against an initially static white noise background that becomes dynamic within a brief time window after disappearance. Here, we have refined the critical time window for dynamic noise onset to just ∼ 20 ms after moving object disappearance. We have also successfully measured the illusion using a sensory reproduction task, that minimizes decisional biases that could have influenced the binary forced choice tasks that have previously been used to measure the illusion. This suggests that the Twinkle-Goes illusion is likely perceptual in origin. We also measured the illusion using a task where people made a saccade to the perceived moving object disappearance position, showing the illusion impacts motor planning. The magnitude of the effect in our data was ∼ 22 ms, at most. This is too slight to reflect on full compensation for delayed sensory processing in early visual brain regions (∼67 ms). However, it is possible that our measures have only partially captured the activity of an extrapolation process that is involved in a full compensation for information processing delays, in order to facilitate motor planning – but this possibility remains speculative, and we review counter arguments and evidence.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.