[Self-determined handling of data in medicine: implications for psychosomatics].

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sabine Sayegh-Jodehl, Johanna Noemi Kues, Matthias Rose, Andreas Stengel
{"title":"[Self-determined handling of data in medicine: implications for psychosomatics].","authors":"Sabine Sayegh-Jodehl, Johanna Noemi Kues, Matthias Rose, Andreas Stengel","doi":"10.1055/a-2686-8301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the challenges and opportunities arising from the increasing digitization of data in medical research and care, focusing on psychosomatics. The aim is to shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of collecting, standardizing, evaluating, and using extensive health data, for example, for Artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The article highlights patient consent using \"broad consent\" as a central aspect. In the context of digital sovereignty, it is crucial to focus on and empower both patients and practitioners. This is the only way to ensure that the future of psychosomatic medicine is shaped by all involved in a value-based and responsible manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":"75 11","pages":"440-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2686-8301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the challenges and opportunities arising from the increasing digitization of data in medical research and care, focusing on psychosomatics. The aim is to shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of collecting, standardizing, evaluating, and using extensive health data, for example, for Artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The article highlights patient consent using "broad consent" as a central aspect. In the context of digital sovereignty, it is crucial to focus on and empower both patients and practitioners. This is the only way to ensure that the future of psychosomatic medicine is shaped by all involved in a value-based and responsible manner.

[医学数据的自主处理:对身心学的影响]。
本文探讨了医学研究和护理数据日益数字化所带来的挑战和机遇,重点是心身学。其目的是阐明收集、标准化、评估和使用广泛健康数据(例如用于人工智能应用)的利弊。文章强调患者同意使用“广泛同意”作为中心方面。在数字主权的背景下,关注患者和从业者并赋予他们权力至关重要。这是确保身心医学的未来由所有参与者以基于价值和负责任的方式塑造的唯一途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书