A randomized study comparing outcomes of intravesical Gemcitabine, Mitomycin C (as hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy-HIVEC) and Bacillus-Calmette Guerin in intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI:10.1177/03915603251388204
Shreyas Nellamkuziyil Michael, Arun Makkar, Supreeth Nagaraju, Rajeev Sood, Hemant Kumar Goel, Umesh Sharma, Anurag Singla, Shivaprasad Sahoo
{"title":"A randomized study comparing outcomes of intravesical Gemcitabine, Mitomycin C (as hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy-HIVEC) and Bacillus-Calmette Guerin in intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Shreyas Nellamkuziyil Michael, Arun Makkar, Supreeth Nagaraju, Rajeev Sood, Hemant Kumar Goel, Umesh Sharma, Anurag Singla, Shivaprasad Sahoo","doi":"10.1177/03915603251388204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravesical therapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the standard of care for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, the global shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and its notable side effect profile have driven interest in alternative agents such as gemcitabine and hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC), both of which have shown promising results.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 consenting patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, as per EAU 2020 risk stratification, were enrolled at a single institution between January 2021 and July 2022. Patients were electronically randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio into three groups: gemcitabine (<i>n</i> = 50), HIVEC (<i>n</i> = 25), and BCG (<i>n</i> = 25). Follow-up included cystoscopy and urine cytology every 3 months. Adverse events were assessed and graded using the Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 94% in the gemcitabine group, 84% in the HIVEC group, and 92% in the BCG group (<i>p</i> = 0.675, intention-to-treat analysis). No cases of grade or stage progression were observed. Most recurrences (88.9%) occurred in the high-risk subgroup. Treatment-related side effects were significantly more frequent in the BCG group, while gemcitabine was the most well-tolerated during both induction and maintenance phases. The most common adverse events included lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), dysuria, and urinary tract infections (UTIs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary findings indicate that intravesical gemcitabine is non-inferior to BCG and HIVEC in terms of short-term efficacy, with a significantly better safety and tolerability profile. These results position gemcitabine as a viable alternative in the management of NMIBC. However, the study's limited sample size and short follow-up period necessitate larger, long-term studies to validate these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"170-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603251388204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intravesical therapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the standard of care for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, the global shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and its notable side effect profile have driven interest in alternative agents such as gemcitabine and hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC), both of which have shown promising results.

Materials and methods: A total of 100 consenting patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, as per EAU 2020 risk stratification, were enrolled at a single institution between January 2021 and July 2022. Patients were electronically randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio into three groups: gemcitabine (n = 50), HIVEC (n = 25), and BCG (n = 25). Follow-up included cystoscopy and urine cytology every 3 months. Adverse events were assessed and graded using the Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification System.

Results: At 12 months, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 94% in the gemcitabine group, 84% in the HIVEC group, and 92% in the BCG group (p = 0.675, intention-to-treat analysis). No cases of grade or stage progression were observed. Most recurrences (88.9%) occurred in the high-risk subgroup. Treatment-related side effects were significantly more frequent in the BCG group, while gemcitabine was the most well-tolerated during both induction and maintenance phases. The most common adverse events included lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), dysuria, and urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Conclusion: Preliminary findings indicate that intravesical gemcitabine is non-inferior to BCG and HIVEC in terms of short-term efficacy, with a significantly better safety and tolerability profile. These results position gemcitabine as a viable alternative in the management of NMIBC. However, the study's limited sample size and short follow-up period necessitate larger, long-term studies to validate these outcomes.

一项比较膀胱内注射吉西他滨、丝裂霉素C(作为膀胱内热化疗- hivec)和卡介苗治疗中高风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌疗效的随机研究。
经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)后膀胱内治疗仍然是非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的标准治疗方法。然而,卡介苗(BCG)的全球短缺及其显著的副作用促使人们对吉西他滨和膀胱内热化疗(HIVEC)等替代药物产生了兴趣,这两种药物都显示出有希望的结果。材料和方法:在2021年1月至2022年7月期间,根据EAU 2020风险分层,共有100名同意的中高风险NMIBC患者在单一机构入组。患者按2:1:1的比例电子随机分为三组:吉西他滨(n = 50), HIVEC (n = 25)和BCG (n = 25)。随访包括每3个月一次膀胱镜检查和尿细胞学检查。使用改良的Clavien-Dindo分类系统对不良事件进行评估和分级。结果:12个月时,吉西他滨组的无复发生存率(RFS)为94%,HIVEC组为84%,BCG组为92% (p = 0.675,意向治疗分析)。没有观察到分级或分期进展的病例。大多数复发(88.9%)发生在高危亚组。治疗相关的副作用在卡介苗组明显更频繁,而吉西他滨在诱导和维持阶段都是耐受性最好的。最常见的不良事件包括下尿路症状(LUTS)、排尿困难和尿路感染(uti)。结论:初步结果表明,膀胱内注射吉西他滨的短期疗效不逊于卡介苗和HIVEC,且安全性和耐受性明显更好。这些结果表明吉西他滨是治疗NMIBC的可行选择。然而,该研究样本量有限,随访时间短,需要更大规模的长期研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书