Serge A Steenen, Roos van Westrhenen, Camilo C Steenen, L Thomas Klausch, Ad De Jongh
{"title":"Concomitant Psychotropic Medication Is Associated with Reduced Outcomes of Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.","authors":"Serge A Steenen, Roos van Westrhenen, Camilo C Steenen, L Thomas Klausch, Ad De Jongh","doi":"10.1159/000549259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychotropic medications are frequently prescribed alongside trauma-focused psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet their impact on treatment response remains uncertain. This study emulated target trials to examine the association between psychotropic co-medication at treatment onset and psychotherapy outcomes in a real-world PTSD cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 6,125 adults with chronic or delayed-onset PTSD received a standardized 2-8 day trauma-focused psychotherapy program, including daily prolonged exposure and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy, at a Dutch psychotrauma center (2021-2024). Target trial emulation with double machine learning with inverse probability of treatment weighting estimated the effects of specific psychotropic co-medications versus non-use on changes in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) scores (range, 0-80) from pre-to post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean CAPS-5 scores improved by 25.7 points (Cohen's d = -2.30). Psychotropic co-medication (n = 1,382) was associated with reduced symptom improvement compared with non-use (model-estimated difference = -2.52 points; relative reduction = -9.4%, 95% CI = -10.0 to -8.9; d = -1.11, E = 10.0). This effect persisted at 6-month follow-up (d = -0.42). Antidepressants overall (d = -0.28; follow-up d = -0.56), amitriptyline (d = -0.51), and mirtazapine (d = -0.29) were consistently associated with poorer outcomes across sensitivity analyses. Similar patterns were observed for anticonvulsants, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, fluoxetine, zolpidem, and zopiclone. Sensitivity analyses and E-values indicated robustness to unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several psychotropic co-medications were associated with reduced outcomes of evidence-based trauma-focused psychotherapy for PTSD. By identifying this as a potentially modifiable factor, psychotherapy outcomes may be optimized. Trials are warranted to evaluate whether tapering or substituting these agents improves outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549259","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Psychotropic medications are frequently prescribed alongside trauma-focused psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet their impact on treatment response remains uncertain. This study emulated target trials to examine the association between psychotropic co-medication at treatment onset and psychotherapy outcomes in a real-world PTSD cohort.
Methods: A prospective cohort of 6,125 adults with chronic or delayed-onset PTSD received a standardized 2-8 day trauma-focused psychotherapy program, including daily prolonged exposure and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy, at a Dutch psychotrauma center (2021-2024). Target trial emulation with double machine learning with inverse probability of treatment weighting estimated the effects of specific psychotropic co-medications versus non-use on changes in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) scores (range, 0-80) from pre-to post-treatment.
Results: Mean CAPS-5 scores improved by 25.7 points (Cohen's d = -2.30). Psychotropic co-medication (n = 1,382) was associated with reduced symptom improvement compared with non-use (model-estimated difference = -2.52 points; relative reduction = -9.4%, 95% CI = -10.0 to -8.9; d = -1.11, E = 10.0). This effect persisted at 6-month follow-up (d = -0.42). Antidepressants overall (d = -0.28; follow-up d = -0.56), amitriptyline (d = -0.51), and mirtazapine (d = -0.29) were consistently associated with poorer outcomes across sensitivity analyses. Similar patterns were observed for anticonvulsants, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, fluoxetine, zolpidem, and zopiclone. Sensitivity analyses and E-values indicated robustness to unmeasured confounding.
Conclusion: Several psychotropic co-medications were associated with reduced outcomes of evidence-based trauma-focused psychotherapy for PTSD. By identifying this as a potentially modifiable factor, psychotherapy outcomes may be optimized. Trials are warranted to evaluate whether tapering or substituting these agents improves outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field.
As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers.
The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.