A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of work-focused interventions for employees with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Samineh Sanatkar, Rosie Lipscomb, Katherine Petrie, Daniel Collins, Andrew Arena, Mei Xu, Isabelle Counson, Vita Ligaya Dalgaard, Arnstein Mykletun, Anthony D LaMontagne, Samuel B Harvey, Mark Deady
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of work-focused interventions for employees with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress.","authors":"Samineh Sanatkar, Rosie Lipscomb, Katherine Petrie, Daniel Collins, Andrew Arena, Mei Xu, Isabelle Counson, Vita Ligaya Dalgaard, Arnstein Mykletun, Anthony D LaMontagne, Samuel B Harvey, Mark Deady","doi":"10.1007/s00420-025-02181-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It is estimated that, every year, one fifth of the working population is affected by common mental disorders. Common mental disorders are associated with functional impairments, including those that affect work performance, such as exhaustion and cognitive problems. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the mental health impacts of work-focused interventions involving organisational-level strategies through work modifications and manager cooperation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were eligible for inclusion if interventions incorporated organisational strategies to improve work functioning outcomes for employees with symptoms of common mental disorders and compared the effectiveness of the intervention with a control group. The types of organisational strategies and therapeutic approaches utilised in interventions were also compared. In March 2024, a search was completed across Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Data from 10 studies (n = 2281) was available post intervention to examine work functioning outcomes and from 22 studies (n = 3963) to examine mental health outcomes. Overall pooled effect sizes of work functioning (Standardised Mean Difference = 0.41, Standard Error = 0.08, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.25, 0.57]) and mental health (Standardised Mean Difference = 0.18, Standard Error = 0.05, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.08, 0.27]) outcomes post intervention were small but significant in favour of interventions. These effects were not sustained 12 to 24 months later. Organisational strategies with a focus on work modifications had superior benefits compared to those with a focus on manager cooperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggests that employees completing work-focused interventions were better supported in the short term than those who received usual care or no intervention. More research needs to be undertaken to assess essential components of organisational strategies, under which circumstances and for whom the implementation of these strategies would be indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":13761,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":"859-882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-025-02181-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: It is estimated that, every year, one fifth of the working population is affected by common mental disorders. Common mental disorders are associated with functional impairments, including those that affect work performance, such as exhaustion and cognitive problems. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the mental health impacts of work-focused interventions involving organisational-level strategies through work modifications and manager cooperation.

Methods: Studies were eligible for inclusion if interventions incorporated organisational strategies to improve work functioning outcomes for employees with symptoms of common mental disorders and compared the effectiveness of the intervention with a control group. The types of organisational strategies and therapeutic approaches utilised in interventions were also compared. In March 2024, a search was completed across Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases.

Results: A total of 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Data from 10 studies (n = 2281) was available post intervention to examine work functioning outcomes and from 22 studies (n = 3963) to examine mental health outcomes. Overall pooled effect sizes of work functioning (Standardised Mean Difference = 0.41, Standard Error = 0.08, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.25, 0.57]) and mental health (Standardised Mean Difference = 0.18, Standard Error = 0.05, 95% Confidence Interval = [0.08, 0.27]) outcomes post intervention were small but significant in favour of interventions. These effects were not sustained 12 to 24 months later. Organisational strategies with a focus on work modifications had superior benefits compared to those with a focus on manager cooperation.

Conclusion: Findings suggests that employees completing work-focused interventions were better supported in the short term than those who received usual care or no intervention. More research needs to be undertaken to assess essential components of organisational strategies, under which circumstances and for whom the implementation of these strategies would be indicated.

以工作为中心的干预措施对有抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰症状的员工的有效性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:据估计,每年有五分之一的工作人口受到常见精神障碍的影响。常见的精神障碍与功能障碍有关,包括那些影响工作表现的障碍,如疲劳和认知问题。本研究采用系统回顾和荟萃分析的方法,通过工作调整和管理者合作,探讨以工作为中心的干预措施对员工心理健康的影响。方法:如果干预措施纳入了组织策略,以改善有常见精神障碍症状的员工的工作功能结果,并将干预措施的有效性与对照组进行比较,则研究符合纳入条件。还比较了干预措施中使用的组织策略和治疗方法的类型。2024年3月,在Embase、PubMed、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库中完成了搜索。结果:共有30项研究符合纳入标准。干预后可获得10项研究(n = 2281)的数据以检查工作功能结果,并可获得22项研究(n = 3963)的数据以检查心理健康结果。干预后工作功能(标准化平均差= 0.41,标准误差= 0.08,95%置信区间=[0.25,0.57])和心理健康(标准化平均差= 0.18,标准误差= 0.05,95%置信区间=[0.08,0.27])结局的总体合并效应量虽小,但有利于干预。这些影响在12至24个月后没有持续。与注重管理者合作的组织战略相比,注重工作修改的组织战略具有更高的效益。结论:研究结果表明,完成以工作为中心的干预的员工在短期内比接受常规护理或不接受干预的员工得到更好的支持。需要进行更多的研究,以评估组织战略的基本组成部分,在何种情况下以及为谁执行这些战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health publishes Editorials, Review Articles, Original Articles, and Letters to the Editor. It welcomes any manuscripts dealing with occupational or ambient environmental problems, with a special interest in research at the interface of occupational health and clinical medicine. The scope ranges from Biological Monitoring to Dermatology, from Fibers and Dust to Human Toxicology, from Nanomaterials and Ultra-fine Dust to Night- and Shift Work, from Psycho-mental Distress and Burnout to Vibrations. A complete list of topics can be found on the right-hand side under For authors and editors. In addition, all papers should be based on present-day standards and relate to: -Clinical and epidemiological studies on morbidity and mortality -Clinical epidemiological studies on the parameters relevant to the estimation of health risks -Human experimental studies on environmental health effects. Animal experiments are only acceptable if relevant to pathogenic aspects. -Methods for studying the topics mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书