Double brooding in house wrens is repeatable but constrained by time-of-season.

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI:10.1093/beheco/araf101
Lauren Leischner, Scott K Sakaluk, Charles F Thompson, Pirmin Nietlisbach
{"title":"Double brooding in house wrens is repeatable but constrained by time-of-season.","authors":"Lauren Leischner, Scott K Sakaluk, Charles F Thompson, Pirmin Nietlisbach","doi":"10.1093/beheco/araf101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Birds in some species produce 2 broods in a season to maximize reproductive success, but in species such as the northern house wren (<i>Troglodytes aedon</i>), not all individuals produce a second brood even if they have enough time to do so. We investigated whether variation in individual quality, in addition to time-of-season, explains some of the variation in the likelihood of producing a second brood. We examined the effects of individual age, body condition, and territory quality, and estimated the repeatability of producing a second brood using breeding records from a long-term dataset. We also cross-fostered eggs between earlier-nesting females (presumed high quality) and later-nesting females (presumed low quality) to delay or advance the natural nesting date, exposing an effect of quality if present. There was little evidence that the individual traits measured affected the production of a second brood. Cross-fostered, delayed females did not differ from the control in their likelihood of producing a second brood, but advanced females were more likely to produce a second brood compared with the control. However, the production of a second brood was significantly repeatable, and this repeatability was substantially higher after accounting for variation in the timing of the first brood. This suggests that individual characteristics, in addition to time-of-season, have a substantial effect on the likelihood of producing a second brood, but that further studies are needed to identify the specific traits responsible for this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"36 6","pages":"araf101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12596418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Birds in some species produce 2 broods in a season to maximize reproductive success, but in species such as the northern house wren (Troglodytes aedon), not all individuals produce a second brood even if they have enough time to do so. We investigated whether variation in individual quality, in addition to time-of-season, explains some of the variation in the likelihood of producing a second brood. We examined the effects of individual age, body condition, and territory quality, and estimated the repeatability of producing a second brood using breeding records from a long-term dataset. We also cross-fostered eggs between earlier-nesting females (presumed high quality) and later-nesting females (presumed low quality) to delay or advance the natural nesting date, exposing an effect of quality if present. There was little evidence that the individual traits measured affected the production of a second brood. Cross-fostered, delayed females did not differ from the control in their likelihood of producing a second brood, but advanced females were more likely to produce a second brood compared with the control. However, the production of a second brood was significantly repeatable, and this repeatability was substantially higher after accounting for variation in the timing of the first brood. This suggests that individual characteristics, in addition to time-of-season, have a substantial effect on the likelihood of producing a second brood, but that further studies are needed to identify the specific traits responsible for this effect.

鹪鹩的双重繁殖是可重复的,但受季节的限制。
为了最大限度地提高繁殖成功率,一些物种的鸟类在一个季节里会产下两窝,但在像北方鹪鹩(穴居人)这样的物种中,即使有足够的时间,也不是所有的个体都能产下第二窝。我们调查了个体素质的变化,以及季节的变化,是否解释了产生第二窝的可能性的一些变化。我们研究了个体年龄、身体状况和领地质量的影响,并利用长期数据集的繁殖记录估计了产生第二窝的可重复性。我们还在早产卵的雌性(假设质量高)和晚产卵的雌性(假设质量低)之间交叉培育卵子,以推迟或提前自然产卵日期,暴露质量的影响。几乎没有证据表明所测量的个体特征会影响第二窝的产生。交叉培养的,延迟的雌性在产生第二窝的可能性上与对照组没有区别,但与对照组相比,先进的雌性更有可能产生第二窝。然而,第二窝的生产具有显著的可重复性,并且在考虑到第一窝时间的变化后,这种可重复性大大提高。这表明,除了季节因素外,个体特征对产生第二窝的可能性也有重大影响,但需要进一步的研究来确定造成这种影响的具体特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书