{"title":"From Harmful Acts to Helping Hands: When and How Employee Deceptive Knowledge Hiding Promotes Workplace Helping Behavior","authors":"Peixu He, Hanhui Zhou, Qiongyao Zhou, Xiayi Liu, Zhixing Xu","doi":"10.1002/job.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This research examines the morally compensatory behavioral consequence, wherein employees engage in subsequent helping behavior to repair prior deceptive knowledge hiding. Grounded in moral cleansing theory, we propose and validate a parallel path mediation model that accounts for emotional (self-conscious moral emotions) and cognitive (moral self-regulation) processes. Through a multimethod design combining a vignette experiment (Study 1) with a two-wave field survey involving 181 employee-coworker dyads (Study 2), we find that, first, deceptive knowledge hiding triggers morally compensatory helping behavior, demonstrating the behavioral transformation of this implicitly immoral behavior; second, guilt experience (an emotional mechanism) and perceived loss of moral credits (a cognitive mechanism) mediate the deceptive knowledge hiding–helping behavior relationship; and third, reflective moral attentiveness amplifies the effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on both those mediators and the indirect effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on helping behavior through those mediators, establishing this individual moral trait as a boundary condition. Our research enriches the knowledge management literature by uncovering the moral compensation processes that follow deceptive knowledge hiding. It also highlights implications for managing posttransgression behaviors in organizations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"46 9","pages":"1247-1264"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research examines the morally compensatory behavioral consequence, wherein employees engage in subsequent helping behavior to repair prior deceptive knowledge hiding. Grounded in moral cleansing theory, we propose and validate a parallel path mediation model that accounts for emotional (self-conscious moral emotions) and cognitive (moral self-regulation) processes. Through a multimethod design combining a vignette experiment (Study 1) with a two-wave field survey involving 181 employee-coworker dyads (Study 2), we find that, first, deceptive knowledge hiding triggers morally compensatory helping behavior, demonstrating the behavioral transformation of this implicitly immoral behavior; second, guilt experience (an emotional mechanism) and perceived loss of moral credits (a cognitive mechanism) mediate the deceptive knowledge hiding–helping behavior relationship; and third, reflective moral attentiveness amplifies the effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on both those mediators and the indirect effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on helping behavior through those mediators, establishing this individual moral trait as a boundary condition. Our research enriches the knowledge management literature by uncovering the moral compensation processes that follow deceptive knowledge hiding. It also highlights implications for managing posttransgression behaviors in organizations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.