From Harmful Acts to Helping Hands: When and How Employee Deceptive Knowledge Hiding Promotes Workplace Helping Behavior

IF 9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Peixu He, Hanhui Zhou, Qiongyao Zhou, Xiayi Liu, Zhixing Xu
{"title":"From Harmful Acts to Helping Hands: When and How Employee Deceptive Knowledge Hiding Promotes Workplace Helping Behavior","authors":"Peixu He,&nbsp;Hanhui Zhou,&nbsp;Qiongyao Zhou,&nbsp;Xiayi Liu,&nbsp;Zhixing Xu","doi":"10.1002/job.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This research examines the morally compensatory behavioral consequence, wherein employees engage in subsequent helping behavior to repair prior deceptive knowledge hiding. Grounded in moral cleansing theory, we propose and validate a parallel path mediation model that accounts for emotional (self-conscious moral emotions) and cognitive (moral self-regulation) processes. Through a multimethod design combining a vignette experiment (Study 1) with a two-wave field survey involving 181 employee-coworker dyads (Study 2), we find that, first, deceptive knowledge hiding triggers morally compensatory helping behavior, demonstrating the behavioral transformation of this implicitly immoral behavior; second, guilt experience (an emotional mechanism) and perceived loss of moral credits (a cognitive mechanism) mediate the deceptive knowledge hiding–helping behavior relationship; and third, reflective moral attentiveness amplifies the effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on both those mediators and the indirect effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on helping behavior through those mediators, establishing this individual moral trait as a boundary condition. Our research enriches the knowledge management literature by uncovering the moral compensation processes that follow deceptive knowledge hiding. It also highlights implications for managing posttransgression behaviors in organizations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"46 9","pages":"1247-1264"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the morally compensatory behavioral consequence, wherein employees engage in subsequent helping behavior to repair prior deceptive knowledge hiding. Grounded in moral cleansing theory, we propose and validate a parallel path mediation model that accounts for emotional (self-conscious moral emotions) and cognitive (moral self-regulation) processes. Through a multimethod design combining a vignette experiment (Study 1) with a two-wave field survey involving 181 employee-coworker dyads (Study 2), we find that, first, deceptive knowledge hiding triggers morally compensatory helping behavior, demonstrating the behavioral transformation of this implicitly immoral behavior; second, guilt experience (an emotional mechanism) and perceived loss of moral credits (a cognitive mechanism) mediate the deceptive knowledge hiding–helping behavior relationship; and third, reflective moral attentiveness amplifies the effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on both those mediators and the indirect effects of deceptive knowledge hiding on helping behavior through those mediators, establishing this individual moral trait as a boundary condition. Our research enriches the knowledge management literature by uncovering the moral compensation processes that follow deceptive knowledge hiding. It also highlights implications for managing posttransgression behaviors in organizations.

从有害行为到援助之手:员工的欺骗性知识隐藏何时以及如何促进工作场所的帮助行为
本研究考察了道德补偿行为的后果,即员工采取后续帮助行为来修复先前的欺骗性知识隐藏。在道德净化理论的基础上,我们提出并验证了一个平行路径中介模型,该模型考虑了情绪(自我意识的道德情绪)和认知(道德自我调节)过程。通过多方法设计,结合小插图实验(研究1)和两波现场调查(研究2),我们发现,首先,欺骗性知识隐藏触发道德补偿性帮助行为,展示了这种隐性不道德行为的行为转化;第二,内疚体验(情感机制)和道德信用知觉丧失(认知机制)在欺骗性知识隐藏-帮助行为关系中起中介作用;第三,反思性道德注意放大了欺骗性知识隐藏对这些中介的影响,也放大了欺骗性知识隐藏通过这些中介对帮助行为的间接影响,从而将这种个人道德特质作为一个边界条件。我们的研究通过揭示欺骗性知识隐藏之后的道德补偿过程,丰富了知识管理的文献。它还强调了在组织中管理犯罪后行为的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书