Eficacia y seguridad de la combinación cinarizina/dimenhidrinato frente a betahistina en el tratamiento del vértigo: revisión sistemática de la literatura

Abstract

Vertigo is a frequent reason for medical consultation and may result from a wide range of etiologies. Betahistine and the fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine 20 mg and dimenhydrinate 40 mg are commonly used therapeutic options, each with distinct antivertigo profiles. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two treatments in patients with vertigo of various origins. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Eligible studies included clinical trials and meta-analyses comparing the fixed low-dose combination (20 mg/40 mg) versus betahistine (12 or 16 mg), assessing efficacy through the Mean Vertigo Score (MVS) and safety based on the incidence of adverse events (AEs). The RoB 2 and ROBIS tools were used to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of nine studies were identified (six clinical trials and three meta-analyses). In five of the six clinical trials, the fixed low-dose combination significantly reduced MVS compared with betahistine at weeks 1 and/or 4 (p < 0.05); these findings were corroborated by the three meta-analyses. Regarding safety, both treatments were well tolerated, with no serious AEs reported and a generally lower incidence observed in the fixed low-dose combination group. Overall, the fixed low-dose combination demonstrated superior clinical efficacy from the first week of treatment, along with a more favorable tolerability and safety profile. These results support its preferential use in the management of acute vestibular syndrome.