Multidimensional assessment and precision restoration strategies for soil erosion in karst areas: Based on multi-scenario simulation

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Longhui Pan , Rui Li , Benjin Yu , Wanquan Zhang , Chaoyang Xue , Zhenhong Yi
{"title":"Multidimensional assessment and precision restoration strategies for soil erosion in karst areas: Based on multi-scenario simulation","authors":"Longhui Pan ,&nbsp;Rui Li ,&nbsp;Benjin Yu ,&nbsp;Wanquan Zhang ,&nbsp;Chaoyang Xue ,&nbsp;Zhenhong Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsrc.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Karst landscapes are plagued by severe soil erosion due to their fractured lithology and complex hydrology, posing persistent challenges to erosion assessment and ecological restoration. However, current approaches often fail to account for the spatial heterogeneity and hydrological complexity typical of karst terrains. This study developed and compared four vegetation restoration scenarios—the status quo scenario, linear scenario, patch scenario, and combined scenario—using an integrated modeling framework based on the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and the sediment connectivity index (IC). The combined scenario, which integrates linear buffers with patch-based vegetation, showed superior performance in reducing both soil erosion and sediment connectivity. The patch scenario also shows strong adaptability in steep-slope areas because it effectively mitigates sediment transport potential. To improve restoration precision further, a slope- and karst desertification-sensitive vegetation configuration strategy was proposed. This study also introduced the use of bivariate Moran's <em>I</em> analysis to identify spatial hotspots of erosion and connectivity overlap. These results provide a novel methodology for evaluating multiscenario ecological restoration in karst regions. The findings offer practical guidance for implementing targeted soil and water conservation interventions and contribute to the broader goal of sustainable land management in ecologically fragile environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50290,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sediment Research","volume":"40 6","pages":"Pages 972-989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sediment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627925000903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Karst landscapes are plagued by severe soil erosion due to their fractured lithology and complex hydrology, posing persistent challenges to erosion assessment and ecological restoration. However, current approaches often fail to account for the spatial heterogeneity and hydrological complexity typical of karst terrains. This study developed and compared four vegetation restoration scenarios—the status quo scenario, linear scenario, patch scenario, and combined scenario—using an integrated modeling framework based on the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and the sediment connectivity index (IC). The combined scenario, which integrates linear buffers with patch-based vegetation, showed superior performance in reducing both soil erosion and sediment connectivity. The patch scenario also shows strong adaptability in steep-slope areas because it effectively mitigates sediment transport potential. To improve restoration precision further, a slope- and karst desertification-sensitive vegetation configuration strategy was proposed. This study also introduced the use of bivariate Moran's I analysis to identify spatial hotspots of erosion and connectivity overlap. These results provide a novel methodology for evaluating multiscenario ecological restoration in karst regions. The findings offer practical guidance for implementing targeted soil and water conservation interventions and contribute to the broader goal of sustainable land management in ecologically fragile environments.
基于多情景模拟的喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀多维评估与精准修复策略
喀斯特景观因其破碎的岩性和复杂的水文环境,受到严重的水土流失的困扰,给水土流失评价和生态修复带来了持续的挑战。然而,目前的方法往往不能解释喀斯特地形的空间异质性和水文复杂性。采用基于修正通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)和泥沙连通性指数(IC)的综合建模框架,建立并比较了现状情景、线性情景、斑块情景和组合情景4种植被恢复情景。将线性缓冲带与斑块型植被相结合的组合方案在减少土壤侵蚀和沉积物连通性方面表现优异。斑块情景在陡坡地区也表现出较强的适应性,因为它有效地减轻了输沙潜力。为了进一步提高恢复精度,提出了坡度和喀斯特荒漠化敏感型植被配置策略。本研究还引入了双变量Moran’s I分析来识别侵蚀和连通性重叠的空间热点。这些结果为喀斯特地区多情景生态恢复评价提供了一种新的方法。这些发现为实施有针对性的水土保持干预措施提供了实践指导,并有助于实现生态脆弱环境中可持续土地管理的更广泛目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Sediment Research
International Journal of Sediment Research 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
88
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Sediment Research, the Official Journal of The International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation and The World Association for Sedimentation and Erosion Research, publishes scientific and technical papers on all aspects of erosion and sedimentation interpreted in its widest sense. The subject matter is to include not only the mechanics of sediment transport and fluvial processes, but also what is related to geography, geomorphology, soil erosion, watershed management, sedimentology, environmental and ecological impacts of sedimentation, social and economical effects of sedimentation and its assessment, etc. Special attention is paid to engineering problems related to sedimentation and erosion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书