The Belgian 'Impossible Scenario' of 1980: Reinventing planning in times of 'crisis'.

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Zoé Evrard
{"title":"The Belgian 'Impossible Scenario' of 1980: Reinventing planning in times of 'crisis'.","authors":"Zoé Evrard","doi":"10.1017/S0269889725100768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1980, Belgian Plan Commissioner Robert Maldague clandestinely circulated a document called <i>The Impossible Scenario,</i> thereby reshaping planning practices in Belgium amidst a widely perceived moment of crisis. Using archival records and oral histories, this article traces how reformers within the (now federal) Belgian Planning Bureau combined foresight scenarios and macroeconomic modeling in <i>The Impossible Scenario</i>. It explains the use of foresight scenarios through the Planning Bureau's aim of restoring its capacity to intervene in Belgian policymaking. The article then highlights the broader political meaning of this epistemic transformation: the reconfiguration of planning infrastructures in Belgium-and, more broadly, in Europe-from instruments of democratic economic coordination to tools of market governance. Examining this previously underexplored Belgian case thereby reveals the neoliberaliz<i>ed</i> and neoliberaliz<i>ing</i> character of Western planning infrastructures in the early 1980s.</p>","PeriodicalId":49562,"journal":{"name":"Science in Context","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in Context","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889725100768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1980, Belgian Plan Commissioner Robert Maldague clandestinely circulated a document called The Impossible Scenario, thereby reshaping planning practices in Belgium amidst a widely perceived moment of crisis. Using archival records and oral histories, this article traces how reformers within the (now federal) Belgian Planning Bureau combined foresight scenarios and macroeconomic modeling in The Impossible Scenario. It explains the use of foresight scenarios through the Planning Bureau's aim of restoring its capacity to intervene in Belgian policymaking. The article then highlights the broader political meaning of this epistemic transformation: the reconfiguration of planning infrastructures in Belgium-and, more broadly, in Europe-from instruments of democratic economic coordination to tools of market governance. Examining this previously underexplored Belgian case thereby reveals the neoliberalized and neoliberalizing character of Western planning infrastructures in the early 1980s.

1980年比利时的“不可能情景”:在“危机”时期重新制定规划。
1980年,比利时计划专员罗伯特·马尔达格(Robert Maldague)秘密散发了一份名为《不可能的情景》(The Impossible Scenario)的文件,从而在人们普遍认为的危机时刻重塑了比利时的规划实践。本文利用档案记录和口述历史,追溯了比利时规划局(现为联邦)内部的改革者如何在《不可能的情景》中结合远见情景和宏观经济模型。它通过规划局恢复其干预比利时决策能力的目标,解释了使用预见情景的原因。文章接着强调了这种认知转变的更广泛的政治意义:比利时规划基础设施的重新配置——更广泛地说,在欧洲——从民主经济协调的工具到市场治理的工具。研究这个以前未被充分探讨的比利时案例,从而揭示了20世纪80年代初西方规划基础设施的新自由主义化和新自由主义化特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science in Context
Science in Context 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science in Context is an international journal edited at The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, with the support of the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. It is devoted to the study of the sciences from the points of view of comparative epistemology and historical sociology of scientific knowledge. The journal is committed to an interdisciplinary approach to the study of science and its cultural development - it does not segregate considerations drawn from history, philosophy and sociology. Controversies within scientific knowledge and debates about methodology are presented in their contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书